Quantification in Warlpiri
In this chapter, I provide a descriptive overview of quantification in Warlpiri, a Pama-Nyungan language spoken by approximately 3,000 people in central Australia. Warlpiri’s quantificational system is of particular interest due to the fact that a number of Warlpiri A-quantifiers are interpreted as taking nominal scope; that is, as D-quantifiers. Conversely, a number of Warlpiri D-quantifiers are interpreted as modifying the VP or event; that is, as A-quantifiers. I show that Warlpiri has a relatively large inventory of D-quantifiers, many of which are morphologically complex. This challenges standard assumptions of quantifiers as a typically monomorphemic lexical category, and sheds light on the relevant compositional properties of Warlpiri quantifiers.
I would like to thank Mary Laughren for her very thorough and insightful comments on an early draft of this chapter, as well as Ed Keenan and David Nash. I would also like to thank Cecilia Alfonso, Gloria Morales, and Wendy Baarda in Yuendumu. Finally, my deepest thanks go to my Warlpiri consultants Nancy Napurrurla Oldfield, Alma Nungarrayi Granites, Otto Jungarrayi Sims, Erica Napurrurla Ross, and Tess Napaljarri Ross. This research was funded in part by NSF GRFP grant DGE-1144087. All remaining errors are my own.
- Bavin, E. & Shopen, T. (1985). Warlpiri and English: Languages in contact. In M. Clyne (Ed.), Australia, meeting place of languages, Pacific linguistics (pp. 81–94). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
- Bittner, M. & Hale, K.(1995). Remarks on definiteness in Warlpiri. In E. Bach et al. (Ed.), Quantification in natural languages (pp. 81–107). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Bowler, M. (2014). Conjunction and disjunction in a language without ‘and’. Master’s thesis, UCLA.Google Scholar
- Bowler, M. (2015). Warlpiri evaluative morphology. In N. Grandi & L. Körtvélyessy (Eds.), Edinburgh handbook of evaluative morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Bowler, M. (2016). The status of degrees in Warlpiri. In M. Grubic & A. Mucha (Eds.), Proceedings of the Semantics of African, Asian, and Austronesian Languages 2. Potsdam: Universität Potsdam.Google Scholar
- Evans, N. (1995). A-quantifiers and scope in Mayali. In E. Bach et al. (Ed.), Quantification in natural languages. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Hale, K. (1973). Person marking in Walbiri. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
- Hale, K. (1975). Gaps in grammar and culture. In K. L. Hale, O. Werner, & M. D. Kinkade (Ed.), Linguistics and anthropology: In Honor of C.F. Voegelin (pp. 295–315). Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
- Laughren, M. (2002). Syntactic constraints in a “free word order” language (pp. 83–130). Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
- Laughren, M., & Eisenchlas, S. (2006). The role of animacy and definiteness in the clitic-DP nexus. In K. Allan (Ed.), Selected Papers from the 2005 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society (pp. 1–11).Google Scholar
- Legate, J. (2002). Warlpiri: Theoretical implications. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
- Nash, D. (1982). Warlpiri verb roots and preverbs. In S. Swartz (Ed.), Papers in Warlpiri grammar: In memory of Lothar Jagst (pp. 165–216). Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
- Nash, D. (1986). Topics in Warlpiri grammar. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar