Advertisement

The Impact of Electoral Systems on Women’s Political Representation

  • Tracy-Ann Johnson-MyersEmail author
Chapter
  • 816 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Political Science book series (BRIEFSPOLITICAL)

Abstract

This chapter raises and answers several important questions about the effects of electoral systems on women. There is a general consensus in the literature on political representation that countries applying a proportional representation (PR) system have a higher number of women in their national parliaments than those with single-member, first-past-the-post systems. This is primarily because parties can be encouraged to craft a balanced party list, reflecting the wide range of interests, social and demographical make-up of the wider society. While it is evident in the literature on electoral systems and representation that women are better represented numerically under ‘pure’ PR systems, more recently, countries seeking electoral reform have turned to mixed or hybrid electoral systems. Mixed electoral systems which have become popular over the past few decades are similar to other forms of PR systems in that the overall total of party members in the elected body is intended to mirror the overall proportion of votes received. The difference lies in the way by which they include a set of members elected by geographic constituency and who are deducted from the party totals so as to maintain an overall proportionality. As a proportional representation system, the Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) ensures that voters’ party preferences are proportionally reflected in the party composition of parliament.

Keywords

Electoral System Proportional Representation Female Candidate National Parliament African National Congress 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bird, K. (2003, November 11). The political representation of women and ethnic minorities in established democracies: A framework for comparative research. Working Paper presented for the Academy of Migration Studies in Denmark (AMID), Aalborg University, Denmark.Google Scholar
  2. Bogdanor, V. (1984). What is proportional representation? A guide to the issues. Oxford, GB: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
  3. Britton, H. (2008). South Africa: Challenging traditional thinking on electoral systems. In M. Tremblay (Ed.), Women and legislative representation (pp. 117–128). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Ellis, A. (2005, May). Principles of electoral system choice. Presented at Workshop VI: Representative democracy, participatory methods and capacity development for responsible politics sixth global forum on reinventing government Seoul, Republic of Korea.Google Scholar
  5. IDEA. (2015). Gender quotas around the World. Global database of quotas for women. Retrieved from http://www.quotaproject.org/country.cfm
  6. Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2016). Women in national parliaments. Retrieved from http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm
  7. Kenworthy, L., & Malami, M. (2005). Gender inequality in political representation: A worldwide comparative analysis. Social Forces, 78(1), 235–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lijphart, A. (1994). Electoral systems and party systems: A study of twenty-seven democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lijphart, A. (2008). Thinking about democracy: Power sharing and majority rule in theory and practice. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Malone, R. (2009). “Who’s the Boss?”: Executive-legislature relations in New Zealand under MMP. New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law, 7, 1.Google Scholar
  12. Matland, R. (1991). Institutional variables affecting female representation in national legislatures: The Case of Norway. Paper presented at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  13. Matland, R. (1998). Women’s representation in national legislatures: Developed and developing countries. Legislative Studies Quarterly, XXIII, 1, 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Matland, R. (2005). Enhancing women’s political participation: Legislative recruitment and electoral systems. In International IDEA, Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers (Revised Edition). http://www.idea.int/publications/wip2/upload/WiP_inlay.pdf
  15. Matland, R., & Brown, D. (1992). District magnitude’s effect on female representation in U.S. State legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17(4), 469–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Matland, R., & Studlar, D. T. (1996). The contagion of women candidates in single and multimember district systems: Canada and Norway. Journal of Politics, 58(3), 707–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moser, R. G. (2001). The effects of electoral systems on women’s representation in post-communist states. Electoral Studies, 20, 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Norris, P. (2004). Increasing women’s representation in Iraq: What strategies would work best?. John F. Kennedy School of Government: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  19. Norris, P. (2006). The impact of electoral reform on women’s political representation. Acta Politica, 41(2), 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reynolds, A. (1999). Women in the legislatures and executives of the world: knocking at the highest glass ceiling. World Politics, 51(4), 547–572.Google Scholar
  21. Reynolds, A. (2006). Electoral systems and the protection and participation of minorities. Minority Rights Group International. Retrieved from http://www.agora-parl.org/sites/default/files/MRG%20-%20Electoral%20Systems%20-%202006%20-%20EN%20-%20PDP.pdf
  22. Reynolds, A., Reilly, B., & Ellis, A. (2005). Electoral system design: The new international IDEA handbook. Stockholm, Sweden: International IDEA.Google Scholar
  23. Rule, W. (1987). Electoral systems, contextual factors, and women’s opportunity for election to parliament in twenty-three democracies. Western Political Quarterly, 33, 477–498.Google Scholar
  24. Shugart, M., & Wattenberg, M. P. (2001). Mixed member electoral systems: The best of both worlds. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Siaroff, A. (2000). Women’s representation in legislatures and cabinets in industrial democracies. International Political Science Review, 21(2), 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the West IndiesKingstonJamaica

Personalised recommendations