Advertisement

Introduction

  • Tracy-Ann Johnson-MyersEmail author
Chapter
  • 627 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Political Science book series (BRIEFSPOLITICAL)

Abstract

Set in a politics of presence framework, this introductory chapter of the book highlights the importance of having women proportionally represented in politics. It develops the concepts of representation, in both its descriptive and substantive forms and highlights aspects of the extant literature which argue that it is important to have democratic legislatures that are reflective of the wider society. Arguments for the increased political representation of women are often based on the assumption that achieving a ‘politics of presence’ is essential for democracies, because ‘minority’ groups need people from within the group to speak on their behalf. Women’s descriptive representation in parliament is important, but it becomes purely symbolic if it does not bring about outcomes that reflect the interests of conventionally underrepresented groups. Thus efforts to attain a more proportional representation of women should ensure both quantity and quality—a linking of numerical representation to actions and outcomes.

Keywords

Electoral System Policy Outcome Proportional Representation Descriptive Representation Political Representation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bird, K. (2003, November 11). The political representation of women and ethnic minorities in established democracies: A framework for comparative research. Working Paper presented for the Academy of Migration Studies in Denmark (AMID), Aalborg University, Denmark.Google Scholar
  2. Bobo, L., & Gilliam, F. D. (1990). Race, sociopolitical participation, and black empowerment. American Political Science Review, 84, 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bratton, K. A. (2005). Critical mass theory revisited: The behavior and success of token women in state legislatures. Politics and Gender, 1(1), 97–125.Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, S. J. (Ed.). (2001). The Impact of women in public office. Bloomington and Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Celis, K. (2009). Substantive representation of women (and improving it). What is and should it be about? Comparative European Politics, 6(4), 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Childs, S. (2004). New Labour’s women MPs: Women representing women. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Childs, S., & Krook, M. L. (2009). Analysing women’s substantive representation: From critical mass to critical actors. Government and Opposition, 44(2), 125–145.Google Scholar
  8. Crowley, J. E. (2004). When tokens matter. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 29(1), 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowley, P., & Childs, S. (2003). Too spineless to rebel? New Labour’s women MPs. British Journal of Political Science, 33(3), 345–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dahlerup, D. (1988). From a small to a large minority: Women in Scandinavian politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 11(4), 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Darcy, R., Welch, S., & Clark, J. (1994). Women, elections, and representation. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  12. Ghai, Y. (2003). Public participation and minorities. London, England: MRG.Google Scholar
  13. Grey, S. (2002). Does size matter? Critical mass and New Zealand’s women MPs. Parliamentary Affairs, 55(1), 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(1), 965–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lijphart, A. (1994). Electoral systems and party systems: A study of twenty-seven democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lijphart, A., & Grofman, B. (Eds.). (1984). Choosing an electoral system: Issues and alternatives. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
  17. Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’. Journal of Politics, 61, 628–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Norris, P. (2006). The impact of electoral reform on women’s political representation. Acta Politica, 41(2), 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Norris, P. (2004). Increasing women’s representation in Iraq: What strategies would work best?. John F. Kennedy School of Government: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  20. Phillips, A. (1995). The politics of presence. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pitkin, A. (1967). Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  22. Reynolds, A. (2006). Electoral systems and the protection and participation of minorities. Minority Rights Group International. Retrieved from http://www.agora-parl.org/sites/default/files/MRG%20-%20Electoral%20Systems%20-%202006%20-%20EN%20-%20PDP.pdf
  23. Reynolds, A., Reilly, B., & Ellis, A. (2005). Electoral system design: The new international IDEA handbook. Stockholm, Sweden: International IDEA.Google Scholar
  24. Rule, W. (1987). Electoral systems, contextual factors, and women’s opportunity for election to parliament in twenty-three democracies. Western Political Quarterly, 33, 477–498.Google Scholar
  25. Sawer, M. (2004). When women support women…EMILY’s list and the substantive representation of women in Australia. Refereed paper presented to the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference University of Adelaide. Retrieved from http://www.adelaide.edu.au/apsa/docs_papers/Aust%20Pol/Sawer.pdf
  26. Scheiner, E. (2008). Does electoral system reform work? Electoral system lessons from reforms of the 1990s. The Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schwindt-Bayer, L. A., & Mishler, W. (2005). An integrated model of women’s representation. Journal of Politics, 67(2), 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Swain, C. M. (1993). Black faces, black interests. The representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Tremblay, M. (2003). Women’s representational role in Australia and Canada: The impact of political context. Australian Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 215–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tremblay, M. (2007). Electoral systems and substantive representation of women: A comparison of Australia, Canada and New Zealand. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 45(3), 278–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wängnerud, L. (2009). Women in parliaments: Descriptive and substantive representation. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the West IndiesKingstonJamaica

Personalised recommendations