Extending Modal Vision

  • Joshua RasmussenEmail author
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 378)


I offer a new technique for extending our knowledge of what is possible. The surest way to know that something is possible is to know that it is actually so. Yet it is notoriously more difficult to tell whether a state of affairs that has never obtained could obtain. To help us deal with such cases, I offer “continuity” principles that can extend our modal vision beyond the clear cases. These principles, if true, imply that certain “neighbors” of possible states of affairs are probably also possible. I then showcase some intriguing applications of these extension principles: I show how the principles can help us with ancient questions about the foundations of reality and with recent questions about parts and wholes.


Modal Continuity Causal Power Unify Class Modal Vision Independent Reason 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aristotle. Physics (trans: Hardie R.P., & Gaye R.K.), The Internet Classics Archive.Google Scholar
  2. Markosian, N. (Forthcoming). A spatial approach to mereology. In S. Kleinschmidt (Ed.), Mereology and location. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Merricks, T. (2005). Composition and vagueness. Mind, 114(455), 615–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Rasmussen, J. (2013). Continuity as a guide to possibility. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 214(92), 525–38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Azusa Pacific UniversityAzusaUSA

Personalised recommendations