Children, Elders, and Multimodal Arts Curricula: Semiotic Possibilities and the Imperative of Relationship
This chapter explores the affordances of multimodal curricula and pedagogy within intergenerational learning programs. The aim is to provide an understanding of how semiotic possibilities can be promoted within children’s meaning making and the reciprocity of intergenerational relationships. Drawing on findings from our intergenerational multimodal arts research, we discuss how intergenerational learning programs can provide skipped generations (e.g., young children and elders) with collaborative, systematic, and shared learning opportunities through multimodal arts practice. These opportunities are co-constitutive of multimodal literacies and communal agency, which are of fundamental significance for fostering intergenerational relationships and children’s expansive literacy options (i.e., the ways they have for making meaning of and representing the world) and identity options (i.e., the ways they have for seeing themselves in the world). We present new tools for thinking about and planning multimodal arts and literacy curricula in early childhood education that are responsive to the fast-paced changes in communication technology and capable of promoting literacy practices across the life span in mono- and intergenerational settings.
KeywordsIntergenerational learning Literacy options Identity options Multimodal arts Technology Communal agency Semiotics Digital art iPad
- Albers, P. (2007). Finding the artist within: Creating and reading visual texts in the English language arts classroom. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
- Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanič (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7–15). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Beynon, C. A., & Alfano, C. (2013). Intergenerational music learning in community and schools. In D. Elliott, K. Veblen, S. Messenger, & M. Silverman (Eds.), Community music today (pp. 121–132). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2011). Listening to young children: The mosaic approach. London: National Children’s Bureau and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
- Crisp, B. R. (2010). Belonging, connectedness and social exclusion. Journal of Social Inclusion, 1(2), 123–132.Google Scholar
- Cummins, J. (2001). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: California Association for Bilingual Education.Google Scholar
- Cummins, J., & Early, M. (Eds.). (2011). Identity texts: The collaborative creation of power in multilingual schools. Sterling, VA: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
- Fraser, S., & Gestwicki, C. (2002). Authentic childhood: Exploring Reggio Emilia in the classroom. Albany, NY: Delmar Thomson.Google Scholar
- Friedman, B. (1997). The integration of proactive aging education into exciting educational curricula. In K. Brabazon & R. Disch (Eds.), Intergenerational approaches in aging: Implications for education, policy and practice (pp. 103–110). Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press.Google Scholar
- Gregory, E., Long, S., & Volk, D. (Eds.). (2004). Many pathways to literacy: Young children learning with siblings, grandparents, peers, and communities. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
- Guerra, N. G., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2008). Linking the prevention of problem behaviors and positive youth development: Core competencies for positive youth development and risk prevention. In N. G. Guerra & C. P. Bradshaw (Eds.), Core competencies to prevent problem behaviors and promote positive youth development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 122, 1–17. doi:10.1002/cd.Google Scholar
- Hamilton, M., Heydon, R., Hibbert, K., & Stooke, R. (2015). Introduction. In M. Hamilton, R. Heydon, K. Hibbert, & R. Stooke (Eds.), Negotiating spaces for literacy learning: Multimodality and governmentality (pp. 1–14). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Heydon, R. (2013). Learning at the ends of life: Children, elders, and literacies in intergenerational curriculum. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- Heydon, R. (2013–2014). Paint brushes and ipads: A study of multimodal literacy and pedagogy in an intergenerational art program. Unpublished grant proposal for the Faculty of Education, Western University, London.Google Scholar
- Heydon, R., & O’Neill, S. (2014). Songs in our hearts: The affordances and constraints of an intergenerational multimodal arts curriculum. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 15(16). Retrieved November 20, 2014 from http://www.ijea.org/v15n16/.
- Heydon, R., & Rowsell, J. (2015). Phenomenology and literacy studies. In K. Pahl & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 454–471). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hibbert, K. (2013). Developing a wisdom of practice with multiliteracies-in-use. In J. Bainbridge & R. Heydon (Eds.), Constructing meaning: Teaching the language arts K-8 (5th ed., pp. 491–527). Toronto, Canada: ThomsonNelson.Google Scholar
- Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- i2i Intergenerational Society. (2014). Goals of IG immersion. Retrieved from http://www.intergenerational.ca/.
- Izuhara, M. (2010). Introduction. In M. Izuhara (Ed.), Ageing and intergenerational relations: Family reciprocity from a global perspective (pp. 1–12). Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Jarrott, S. E., Kaplan, M. S., & Steinig, S. Y. (Eds.). (2011). Shared site intergenerational programs. Common space, common ground [special double issue], 9(4). Retrieved from http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/spissue/wjir-si1.asp.
- Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (2001). Multimodal learning and teaching: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kress, G., & Jewitt, C. (2003). Introduction. In C. Jewitt & G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 1–18). New York: P. Lang.Google Scholar
- Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
- Kuehne, V., & Kaplan, M. (2001). Evaluation and research on intergenerational shared site facilities and programs: What we know and what we need to learn. Project SHARE Background Paper#1. Washington, DC: Generations United.Google Scholar
- LaPorte, A. M. (2004). Community connections: Intergenerational links in art education. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.Google Scholar
- Marriage & Family Encyclopedia. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://family.jrank.org/pages/903/Intergenerational-Programming-Program-Models.html.
- McAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York: William Morrow & Company.Google Scholar
- Mead, G. H. (1938). The philosophy of the act. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- O’Donnell, D., & McTiernan, K. (2013). Storied lives: Connecting life course narrative identities and eudaimonic happiness in later life. In A. Nicolas & I. Flaherty (Eds.), Growing up, growing old: Trajectories of times and lives (pp. 151–176). Oxford, UK: Interdisciplinary Press.Google Scholar
- O’Neill, S. A. (2016). Young people’s musical lives: Learning ecologies, identities and connectedness. In R. A. R. MacDonald, D. J. Hargreaves, & D. Meill (Eds.), Oxford handbook of musical identities. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2005). Literacy and education: Understanding the new literacy studies in the classroom. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences. (2003). Developing an intergenerational program in your early childhood care and education center: A guidebook for early childhood practitioners. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
- Prinsloo, M. (2005). The new literacies as placed resources. Perspectives in Education, 23(4), 87–98.Google Scholar
- Red Jumper. (2014). Book Creator for iPad (Version number 3.2) [Mobile application software]. Retrieved from http://www.apple.com/itunes/.
- Stein, P. (2000). Rethinking resources in the ESL classroom: Rethinking resources: Multimodal pedagogies in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 333–336. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.proxy1.lib.uwo.ca/stable/3587958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stein, P. (2008). Multimodal pedagogies in diverse classrooms: Representations, rights and resources. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- United Nations General Assembly. (1990). Convention on the rights of the child. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf.Google Scholar
- van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. [electronic version]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Walsh, M. (2011). Multimodal literacy: Researching classroom practice. Newtown, Canada: Primary English Teaching Association (e:lit).Google Scholar
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Williams, B. (2008/1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Wohlwend, K. E. (2013). Literacy playshop: New literacies, popular media, and play in the early childhood classroom. New York: Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar