Advertisement

Young Children’s Drawings and Storytelling: Multimodal Transformations That Help to Mediate Complex Sociocultural Worlds

  • Rosemary D. RichardsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Educating the Young Child book series (EDYC, volume 12)

Abstract

While making sense of their social, cultural and linguistic worlds can be especially challenging for multilingual and immigrant children, child-initiated drawings and graphic stories can assist them to navigate these complex spaces. This chapter describes some of the ways a 5-year-old Chinese-Australian boy, for whom English is a second language, used his drawings and storytelling to facilitate fuller participation with others and to explore and communicate interests and concerns. A narrative and graphic representation of several of his artworks is followed by a consideration of how his drawings functioned as cultural tools and mediating devices through which he explored complex ideas, emotions and experiences. Critically employing Vygotskian sociocultural lenses and Dewey’s notions on art as experience highlights how, through graphic symbols, English and Mandarin, interpersonal and intrapersonal dialogues, and dramatic rendition, a child’s multimodal drawing and storytelling generate shared cultural understandings. Interacting with children as they share their graphic narratives can also reveal valuable insights into the complex worlds of children in immigrant families and their cultural, social and linguistic practices. Such understandings can provide important foundations for bridging children’s personal, home, community and educational lives and thus promoting their educational and socioemotional growth and sense of well-being and belonging.

Keywords

Children’s drawing Narrative research Social worlds Vygotsky Immigrant children Multiliteracies Second language (L2) Transformation Art as experience Children’s storytelling Graphic narrative Belonging 

References

  1. Anning, A., & Ring, K. A. (2004). Making sense of children’s drawings. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Astorga, M. C. (1999). The text-image interaction and second language learning. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 22(3), 212–233.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Government DEEWR. (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from http://docs.education.gov.au
  4. Baghban, M. (2007). Immigration in childhood: Using picture books to cope. The Social Studies, March/April, 2007, 71–76.Google Scholar
  5. Barone, T. (2007). A return to the gold standard? Questioning the future of narrative construction as educational research. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(4), 454–470. doi: 10.1177/1077800406297667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Brooks, M. (2005). Drawing as a unique mental development tool for young children: Interpersonal and intrapersonal dialogues. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(1), 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Crafton, L. K., Silvers, P., & Brennan, M. (2009). Creating a critical multiliteracies curriculum: Repositioning art in the early childhood classroom. In M. Narey (Ed.), Making meaning: Constructing multimodal perspectives of language, literacy, and learning through arts-based early childhood education (pp. 31–51). New York/London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1934/2005). Art as experience. New York: Penguin Group (USA) Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Dyson, A. H. (1993). From prop to mediator: The changing role of written language in children’s symbolic repertoires. In B. Spodek & O. N. Saracho (Eds.), Yearbook in early childhood education: Language and literacy in early childhood education (Vol. 4, pp. 21–41). New York: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
  12. Einarsdottir, J., Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Making meaning: Children’s perspectives expressed though drawings. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Griebling, S. J. U. (2009). Designs for making a tree: An ethnographic study of young children’s work in the visual arts. (Doctor of Education Ed.D. dissertation), University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati.Google Scholar
  15. Griebling, S. J. U. (2011). Discoveries from a Reggio-inspired classroom: Meeting developmental needs through the visual Aats. Art Education, 64(2), 6–11.Google Scholar
  16. Hedges, H. D. (2007). Funds of knowledge in early childhood communities of inquiry. Unpublished thesis. Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  17. Joerdens, S. H. (2014). ‘Belonging means you can go in’: Children’s perspectives and experiences of membership of Kindergarten [Article]. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(1), 12–21.Google Scholar
  18. Konishi, C. (2007). Learning English as a second language: A case study of a Chinese girl in an American preschool. Childhood Education, 83, 267–272. Annual Theme 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kraus, W. (2006). The narrative negotiation of identity and belonging. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, C. D., & Smagorinsky, P. (2000). Introduction: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 1–15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Li, G. (2007). Home environment and second-language acquisition: The importance of family capital. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(3), 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lui, K. C., & Blila, S. (1995). Ethnic awareness and attitudes in young children. Contemporary Education, 66(3), 146–149.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, P. J., Wiley, A. R., Fung, H., & Liang, C.-H. (1997). Personal storytelling as a medium of socialization in Chinese and American families. Child Development, 68(3), 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2002). Creativity in the meaning: Vygotsky’s contemporary contribution to the dialectic of creativity and development. Retrieved from http://www.unm.edu/~vygotsky/c_make.pdf
  26. Peng, H., Fitzgerald, G., & Park, M. K. (2006). Producing multimedia stories with ESL children: A partnership approach. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(3), 261–284.Google Scholar
  27. Pink, S. (2001). Doing visual ethnography: Image, media and representation in research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Qian, G., & Pan, J. (2006). Susanna’s way of becoming literate: A case study of literacy acquisition by a young girl from a Chinese immigrant family. Reading Horizons, 47(1), 75–96.Google Scholar
  29. Richards, R. D. (2009). Jake just does scribbles but I do pictures: Drawing self-efficacy and the messages four- to nine-year-old children give and receive about their drawing. Koln, Germany: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Richards, R. D. (2012). Young children’s art experiences: A visual ethnographic study with four children in their homes, early childhood centre and schools. (Doctor of Philosophy Ph.D. thesis), University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
  31. Richards, R. D. (2014). The private and public worlds of children’s spontaneous art [Article]. Studies in Art Education, 55(2), 143–156.Google Scholar
  32. Ring, K. (2006). What mothers do: Everyday routines and rituals and their impact upon young children’s use of drawing for meaning making. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14(1), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tannenbaum, M., & Howie, P. (2002). The association between language maintenance and family relations: Chinese immigrant children in Australia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 23(5), 408–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962/1934). Thought and language (trans: Hanfmann, E. & Vakar, G.). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 94–119). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. (1934). Tool and symbol in child development. Retrieved 09 April 2010 http://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/1934/tool-symbol.htm
  37. Wink, J., & Putney, L. (2002). A vision of Vygotsky. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  38. Wright, S. K. (2005). Children’s multimodal meaning-making through drawing and storytelling. Teachers College Record ID Number 12175. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org
  39. Wright, S. K. (2011). Meaning, mediation and mythology. In D. Faulkner & E. Coates (Eds.), Exploring children’s creative narratives (pp. 157–176). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Waiariki Institute of TechnologyRotoruaNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations