Advertisement

Drawing as a Relational Event: Making Meaning Through Talk, Collaboration, and Image Production

  • Kristine E. SundayEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Educating the Young Child book series (EDYC, volume 12)

Abstract

Contemporary understandings of child art suggest that the drawings of children are best understood as cultural productions that are influenced by the intentions and circumstances that surround children’s work. Whereas the artifacts of children’s drawing activity may provide insight into children’s interests and personal experiences, it is within the act of drawing itself whereby children come to make meaning of their everyday worlds. In this chapter, I propose a relational view of children’s drawing in which meaning emerges in the in-between spaces of talk, gesture, mark-making, and artifact. In doing so, I bring forth the idea of children’s drawing as an embodied experience in which thought, talk, activity, and objects are intra-connected. Focusing my discussion within early childhood education, I conclude with thoughts regarding children’s capacity to construct meaningful experiences and advocate for the inclusion of children’s voluntary drawing activity as part of a comprehensive early childhood program.

Keywords

Drawing events Relationality Children’s meaning-making Interpreting child art Relational space Drawing and talk 

References

  1. Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 248–260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  2. Baghban, M. (2007). Scribbles, labels, and stories: The role of drawing in the development of writing. Young Children, 62(1), 20–26.Google Scholar
  3. Binder, M. (2011). Contextual worlds of child art: Experiencing multiple literacies through images. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(4), 367–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing space: The computer and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics. Dijon, France: Le press du reel.Google Scholar
  6. Bourriaud, N. (2009a). The radicant. New York: Lucas and Steinberg.Google Scholar
  7. Bourriaud, N. (2009b). Altermodern: Tate triennial. London: Tate Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Chandler. (2002). Semiotics: The basics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coates, E., & Coates, A. (2006). Young children talking and drawing. International Journal of Early Years Education, 14(3), 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cox, S. (2005). Intention and meaning in young children’s drawing. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 24(2), 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duncum, P. (1993). Ten types of narrative drawing among children’s spontaneous picture making. Visual Arts Research, 19(9), 20–29.Google Scholar
  12. Dyson, A. H. (1986). Transition and tensions: Interrelationships between drawing, talking, and dictating of young children. Research in the Teaching of English, 20(4), 379–409.Google Scholar
  13. Dyson, A. H. (1992). Symbol makers, symbol weavers: How children link play, pictures, and print. Young Children, 45(2), 50–57.Google Scholar
  14. Fineberg, J. (1997). The innocent eye: Children’s art and the modern artist. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gallas, K. (2003). Imagination and literacy: A teacher’s search for the heart of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Goldman, S., & McDermott, R. (2007). Staying the course with video analysis. In R. Golman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Denny (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Golomb, C. (1992). The child’s creation of a pictorial world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kellogg, R. (1969). Analyzing children’s art. Palo Alto, CA: National Press.Google Scholar
  19. Knight, L. (2013). Not as it seems: Using Deleuzian concepts of the imaginary to rethink children’s drawings. Global Studies of Childhood, 3(3), 254–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kreitler, H., & Kreitler, S. (1972). Psychology of the arts. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lowenfeld, V. (1957). Creative and mental growth (3rd ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Luquet, G. H. (2001). Children’s drawings. (A. Costell, Trans.). London: Free Association Books. (Original work published 1927).Google Scholar
  23. Mackenzie, N. (2011). From drawing to writing: What happens when you shift teaching priorities in the first six months of school? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(3), 322–340.Google Scholar
  24. Pearson, P. (2001). Towards a theory of children’s drawing as social practice. Studies in Art Education, 42(4), 348–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1963). The child’s conception of space. (F. J. Langdon & J. L. Lunzer, Trans.). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1948).Google Scholar
  26. Puranik, C. S., & Lonigan, C. J. (2011). From scribble to scrabble: Preschool children’s developing knowledge of written language. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 567–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schulte, C. M. (2011). Verbalizations in children’s drawing performances: Toward a metaphorical continuum of inscription, extension, and re-inscription. Studies in Art Education, 53(1), 20–34.Google Scholar
  28. Stecker, R. (2010). Aesthetics and the philosophy of art: An introduction (2nd ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  29. Sunday, K. (2012). “I’m going to have to draw it to find out”: Children’s drawing performances, knowing, and the formation of egocentric speech. International Art in Early Childhood Research Journal, 4(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  30. Sunday, K. (2015). Relational making: Re/imagining theories of child art. Studies in Art Education, 56(3), 228–240.Google Scholar
  31. Tarr, P. (2004). Consider the walls. Young children on the web. Available at https://www.naeyc.org/files/yc/file/200405/ConsidertheWalls.pdf.
  32. Thompson, C. M. (1999). Action, autobiography and aesthetics in young children’s self initiated drawings. Journal of Art and Design Education, 18(2), 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thompson, C. M. (2002). Drawing together: Peer influence in preschool—kindergarten art classes. In L. Bresler & C. M. Thompson (Eds.), The arts in children’s lives: Context, culture and curriculum (pp. 129–138). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thompson, C. M. (2003). Kinderculture in the art classroom: Early childhood art and the mediation of culture. Studies in Art Education, 44(2), 135–146.Google Scholar
  35. Thompson, C. M. (2009). Mira! Looking, listening, and lingering in research with children. Visual Arts Research, 35(1), 24–34.Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, C. M. (2015). Prosthetic Imaginings and pedagogies of child art. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(6), 554–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson, C. M., & Bales, S. (1991). “Michael doesn’t like my dinosaurs”: Conversations in a preschool art class. Studies in Art Education, 33(1), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thrift, N. (2009). Space: The fundamental stuff of human geography. In N. Clifford, S. Holloway, S. P. Rice, & G. Valentine (Eds.), Key concepts in geography (2nd ed., pp. 85–96). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilson, B. (1974). The superheroes of JC Holz plus and outline of a theory of child art. Art Education, 27(8), 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilson, B. (1976). Little Julian’s impure drawings: Why children make art. Studies in Art Education, 17(2), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilson, M., & Wilson, B. (2009). Teaching children to draw (2nd ed.). Worcester, MA: Davis.Google Scholar
  43. Wright, S. (2007). Young children meaning-making through drawing and ‘telling’: Analogies to filmic textual features. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 32(4), 37–48.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Old Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations