Advertisement

Drawing to Learn

  • Margaret L. BrooksEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Educating the Young Child book series (EDYC, volume 12)

Abstract

This chapter will demonstrate how a specific Vygotskian sociocultural framework can assist teachers in their understanding and support of young children’s drawing processes. Using examples of children drawing in a kindergarten and year-one classroom, I will explore the notion that in drawing, there is evidence of a relationship between thought and drawing that becomes visible through the study of meaning-making processes. Drawing supports the movement from simple spontaneous concepts to more complex concepts and plays an important role in promoting higher mental functions. When drawing is used in a collaborative and communicative manner, it becomes a powerful meaning-making tool. When drawing is recognized as a meaning-making process, supporting drawing then becomes central to the teaching and learning of young children.

Keywords

Drawing Vygotsky Meaning-making Early childhood Higher mental functions Sociocultural 

References

  1. Athey, C. (1990). Extending thought in young children. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Barratt-Pugh, C., & Rohl, M. (2000). Literacy learning in the early years. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  3. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools of the mind – The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, M. (2002). Drawing to learn. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
  5. Brooks, M. (2003). Drawing, thinking, meaning. TRACEY, http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ac/tracey/thin/Brooks.html.
  6. Cox, M. V. (1991). The child’s point of view (2nd ed.). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  7. Duran, R. P., & Syzmanski, M. H. (1995). Co-operative learning interaction and construction of activity. Discourse Processes, 10(1), 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eisner, E. W. (1972). Educating artistic vision. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Gifford, S. (1997). When should they start doing sums? A critical consideration of the emergent mathematics approach. In I. Thompson (Ed.), Teaching and learning early number (pp. 178–183). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Matthews, J. (1999). The art of childhood and adolescence: The construction of meaning. London: Falmer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moll, L. (2002). Inspired by Vygotsky: Ethnographic experiments in education. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 256–268). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In L. S. Vygotsky (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1, problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285) (trans. Minick, N.; Eds. Rieber, R. W. & Carton, A. S.). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  16. Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The history of the development of higher mental functions. In L.S. Vygotsky (Ed.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Vol. 4, problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285).(trans. Minick, N.; Eds. Rieber, R.W. & Carton, A. S). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  17. Wertsch, J. (2000). Vygotsky’s two minds on the nature of meaning. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literary research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 19–30). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Wink, J., & Putney, L. (2002). A vision of Vygotsky. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations