Advertisement

Multimodal Visions: Bringing “Sense” to Our Twenty-First Century Texts

  • Marilyn J. NareyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Educating the Young Child book series (EDYC, volume 12)

Abstract

In this concluding chapter, I attempt to integrate the volume authors’ diverse accounts into a synthesis of ideas that inspire further development of individual and collective multimodal visions. To this end, I discuss a multimodal view of teaching and learning as a creative, transformative process of making sense of experience. Next, I make my own “sensemaking” explicit as I tease out the multimodal actions and interactions of the children and adults described within the experiences and make connections across the varied chapter texts.

Keywords

Meaning-making Twenty-first century futures Multimodal visions 

References

  1. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2013). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. In M. Hawkins (Ed.), Framing languages and literacies: Socially situated views and perspectives (pp. 105–135). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of reflective thinking to the education process. Boston: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  6. Edwards, C. P., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. E. (Eds.). (1998). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach – advanced Reflections (2nd ed.). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  7. Goodman, K. S. (1996). Ken Goodman on reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  8. Joas, H. (1996). The creativity of action. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Narey, M. J. (2008). Social and psychological theories of creativity and reflective practice: A conceptual analysis. Paper presented at the 2008 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. http://www.aera.net/repository
  10. Nelson, M. E. (2006). Mode, meaning, and synaesthesia in multimedia L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology, 10(2), 56–76.Google Scholar
  11. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Narey Educational Consulting, LLCPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations