Advertisement

The Creative “Art” of Making Meaning

  • Marilyn J. NareyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Educating the Young Child book series (EDYC, volume 12)

Abstract

Visually rich digital and media-based texts feature prominently within the educational discourse on preparing learners for their twenty-first century global futures. In discussions of young children’s learning, many early literacy professionals now express familiarity with the term multimodality, although not necessarily a substantive understanding of its application to practice. In this introductory chapter, I offer a starting point for constructing multimodal perspectives of language, literacy, and learning by focusing on the creative “art” of making meaning. Noting the dual use of the term “art,” I draw attention to the notion of making meaning as an “art” and, secondly, to the point that visual images (frequently synonymous with “art”) have become a particularly critical feature of engagement as we prepare children to navigate the changes and challenges of our millennium. I briefly explore relevant constructs: meaning-making, multimodality, and creativity and provide an overview of early phases of young children’s visual language development. Through an insightful description of the multimodal meaning-making processes that emerged in adult-child interactions surrounding a toddler’s early scribbles, I offer authentic illustration of theory in practice. Citing the disconnect between the proliferation of visual textual forms encountered within in our twenty-first century culture and the verbocentric orientation of many adults who influence young children’s learning, I purposefully highlight social justice concerns that problematize the issue of meaning-making in early childhood education relative to adults’ misperceptions of art and children’s image-making.

Keywords

Textual form Twenty-first century learning Visual language Multimodality Multiliteracies Sensemaking Creativity Scribbling Stage theory Art-based learning Semiotic perspective Synaesthesia Social justice Democratic societies Difference Digital literacy Adult-child interactions Toddler Cognitive development Critical thinking 

References

  1. Arnheim, R. (1969/1997). Visual thinking. Berkely, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barrett, T. (2003). Interpreting visual culture. Art Education, 56(2), 6–12.Google Scholar
  3. Bronson, P., & Merryman, A. (2010). The creativity crisis. Newsweek.www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2010/07/10/the-creatvity-crisis.htmlGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Butterworth, G. (1999). Neonatal imitation: Existence, mechanisms, and motives. In J. Nadel & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Imitation in infancy (pp. 63–88). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The basics (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Chung, S. K. (2005). Media/visual literacy art education: Cigarette ad deconstruction. Art Education, 58(3), 19–24.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, L. E., & Uhry, J. (2011). Naming block structures: A multimodal approach. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39(1), 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009a). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009b). New media, new learning. In D. R. Cole & D. L. Pullen (Eds.), Multiliteracies in motion: Current theory and practice (pp. 87–104). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Crafton, L. K., Silvers, P., & Brennan, M. (2009). Creating a critical multiliteracies curriculum: Repositioning art in the early childhood classroom. In M. J. Narey (Ed.), Making meaning (pp. 31–51). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (1934/1980). Art as experience. New York: Perigee.Google Scholar
  14. Dyson, A. H. (2003). The brothers and sisters learn to write: Popular literacies in childhood and school cultures. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  15. Edwards, A. (2004). Understanding context, understanding practice in early education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 12(1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisner, E. W. (1978). Reading and the creation of meaning. In E. W. Eisner (Ed.), Reading, the arts, and the creation of meaning (pp. 13–31). Reston, VA: NAEA.Google Scholar
  17. Eisner, E. W. (1994). Cognition and curriculum reconsidered (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  18. Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Eisner, E. W. (2006). Two visions of education (The Arts Education Collaborative Monograph No. 2). Pittsburgh, PA: Arts Education Collaborative.Google Scholar
  20. Forman, G. E. (1996). Negotiating with Art media to deepen learning. Exchange, 3(96), 56–58.Google Scholar
  21. Gardner, H. (1980). Artful scribbles: The significance of children’s drawing. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  22. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6, 126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodman, K. S. (1986). What’s whole in whole language? Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  25. Goodman, K. S. (1993). Phonics phacts. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  26. Goodman, K. S. (1996). Ken Goodman on reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  27. Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanafin, J., Shevlin, M., & Flynn, M. (2002). Responding to student diversity: Lessons from the margin. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 10(3), 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harste, J. C. (2000). Six points of departure. In B. Berghoff, K. A. Eawa, J. C. Harste, & B. T. Hoonan (Eds.), Beyond reading and writing: Inquiry, curriculum, and multiple ways of knowing (pp. 1–16). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  30. Hatcher, R. (2011). Professional learning for creative teaching and learning. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 404–413). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Heath, S. B., & Wolf, S. A. (2005). Focus in creative learning: Drawing on art for language development. Literacy, 39(1), 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kellogg, R. (1970). Analyzing children’s art. Palo Alto, CA: National Press Books.Google Scholar
  33. Kilbourne, J. (2000). Can’t buy my love: How advertising changes the way we think and feel. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  34. Kress, G. (1997/2005). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Longobardi, C., Quaglia, R., & Iotti, N. O. (2015). Reconsidering the scribbling stage of drawing: A new perspective on toddlers’ representational processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1227. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, W. L. (1947/1964). Creative and mental growth (4th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Luehrman, M., & Unrath, K. (2006). Making theories of children’s artistic development meaningful for preservice teachers. Art Education, 59(3), 6–12.Google Scholar
  39. Matthews, J. (1999). The art of childhood and adolescence: The construction of meaning. London: Falmer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Millard, E., & Marsh, J. (2001). Words with pictures: The role of visual literacy in writing and its implication for schooling. Reading, 35(2), 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Narey, M. J. (2002). A rationale for visual arts education. In Pennsylvania Department of Education and Riverview Intermediate Unit Six (Ed.), Pennsylvania Crosswalks Framework for Visual Arts. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Department of Education.Google Scholar
  42. Narey, M. J. (2008). Social and psychological theories of creativity and reflective practice: A conceptual analysis. Paper presented at the 2008 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (http://www.aera.net/repository).
  43. Narey, M. J. (Ed.). (2009). Making meaning: Constructing multimodal perspectives of language, literacy, and learning through arts-based early childhood education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Narey, M. J. (2014). Educating for 21st century capacities by cultivating teachers’ capacities: Re-envisioning “teaching” within a creativity framework. Paper presented at the 2014 Global Learning Alliance (GLA), Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  45. National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE). (2005). Multimodal literacies. Retrieved March 2, 2008, from http://www.ncte.org/about/over/positions/category/literacy/123213.htm.
  46. Nelson, M. E. (2006). Mode, meaning, and synaesthesia in multimedia L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology, 10(2), 56–76.Google Scholar
  47. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Olson, J. L. (1992). Envisioning writing: Toward an integration of drawing and writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  49. Partnership for 21st Century Schools [P21]. (2011). Framework for 21st century learning. Retrieved December 20, 2013, from http://www.p21.org/overview/skills-framework.
  50. Piro, J. (2002). The picture of reading: Deriving meaning in literacy through image. The Reading Teacher, 56(2), 126–134.Google Scholar
  51. Press, F., & Mitchell, L. (2014). Lived spaces of infant-toddler education and care: Implications for policy. In L. Harrison & J. Sumsion (Eds.), Lived spaces of infant-toddler education and care: Exploring diverse perspectives on theory, research, practice, and policy (pp. 225–240). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Prinsloo, M. (2005). The new literacies as placed resources. Perspectives in Education, 23(4), 87–98.Google Scholar
  53. Prinsloo, M. (2009). Thinking locally, acting globally: The new literacies as placed resources. In D. Koutsogiannis & M. Arapopoulou (Eds.), Literacy, New education: Aspects of the local and global (pp. 181–206). Thessaloniki, Greece: Ziti Publications.Google Scholar
  54. Quaglia, R., Longobardi, C., Iotti, N. O., & Prino, L. E. (2015). A new theory on children’s drawings: Analyzing the role of emotion and movement in graphical development. Infant Behavior and Development, 39, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Read, H. (1958). Education through art. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. Ring, K. (2006). Supporting young children drawing: Developing a role. International Journal of Education through Art, 2(3), 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Siegel, M. (1995). More than words: The generative power of transmediation for learning. Canadian Journal of Education, 20, 455–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Siegel, M. (2006). Rereading the signs: Multimodal transformations in the field of literacy education. Language Arts, 84(1), 65–77.Google Scholar
  60. Siegel, M. (2012). New times for multimodality? Confronting the accountability culture. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(8), 671–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Suhor, C. (1984). Towards a semiotics-based curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16, 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wegerif, R. (2008). Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue. British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wolfe, S., & Flewitt, R. (2010). New technologies, new multimodal literacy practices and young children’s metacognitive development. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(4), 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Narey Educational Consulting, LLCPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations