Abstract
Human-wildlife conflicts have been increasing at alarming rates over the last few decades. Wildlife management practices deal with preventing and disentangling these conflicts. However, which approach should be taken is widely disputed in research, policy, in-the-field-wildlife management and local communities. One key aspect in deciding which approach should be employed concerns the drawing of boundaries, between human and wild animal, between territorial spaces, in the use of certain categorizations and in the implementation of policy regulations. Coexistence between humans and wild animals is propagated worldwide even as human-wildlife conflicts increase. To achieve coexistence, wildlife management practices need to adopt corresponding management strategies. In this chapter it is argued that, in aiming for coexistence, wildlife management practices employ apparently obvious boundaries, which may, however, be adjusted to prevent and disentangle human-wildlife conflicts. Subsequently, it is argued that coexistence between humans and wild animals can only be attained by adopting an integrated approach to human-wildlife-interactions, merging knowledge from the natural and social sciences, and wildlife management practices. This argument is illustrated by exploring the dynamics of boundary drawing in the practice of wild boar management at the Veluwe, the Netherlands and black bear management on the Colorado Front Range, USA. These wildlife management practices display respectively both strategies of confinement and strategies of alignment . In conclusion, wildlife management practices aiming for coexistence require both strategies. Strategies of alignment, however, are prerequisite to opening boundaries between humans and wildlife in order to manage their conflicts as relational endeavours.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baruch-Mordo, S. 2007. Black bear-human conflicts in Colorado: Spatiotemporal patterns and predictors. MSc Thesis, Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University.
Baruch-Mordo, S., S.W. Breck, K.R. Wilson, and J. Broderick. 2009. A tool box half full: How social science can help solve human-wildlife conflict. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14(3): 219–223.
Baruch-Mordo, S., S.W. Breck, K.R. Wilson, and J. Broderick. 2011. The carrot or the stick? Evaluation of education and enforcement as management tools for human-wildlife conflicts. PLoS ONE 6(1): e15681. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015681.
Bear, C. 2011. Being Angelica? Exploring individual animal geographies. Area 43: 297–304.
Bear, C., and S. Eden. 2011. Thinking like a fish? Engaging with non-human difference through recreational angling. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 29: 336–352.
Bradshaw, G.A. 2009. Elephants on the edge: What animals teach us about humanity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Buller, H. 2013. Animal geographies I. Progress in Human Geography 38(2): 308–318.
Cassidy, A., and B. Mills. 2012. ”Fox tots attack shock”: Urban foxes, mass media and boundary-breaching. Environmental Communication 6(4): 494–511.
Center of the American West. 2001. Growth data sheet. http://www.centerwest.org/futures/archive/data_sheet.html.
Colorado State Demography Office. 2014. Population totals for Colorado and sub-state regions. http://www.colorado.gov.
Colorado Wildlife Commission Policy. 2009. Management of wildlife populations. June 11, 2009, 1–3.
Donaldson, S., and W. Kymlicka. 2011. Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Francis, R.A., J. Lorimer, and M. Raco. 2011. Urban ecosystems as “natural” homes for biogeographical boundary crossings. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37: 183–190.
Groot Bruinderink, G., D.R. Lammertsma, H. Baveco, R.M.A. Wegman, A.J. Griffioen, and G.J. Spek. 1999. Aantallen wilde zwijnen in het Veluws Bos/heidegebied op basis van het natuurlijk voedselaanbod. IBN rapport: Wageningen. (In Dutch).
Hinchliffe, S., and S. Whatmore. 2006. Living cities: Towards a politics of conviviality. Science as Culture 15(2): 123–138.
Hinchliffe, S., M.B. Kearnes, M. Degens, and S. Whatmore. 2005. Urban wild things: A cosmopolitical experiment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23: 643–658.
Ingold, T. 2005. Epilogue: Towards a politics of dwelling. Conservation and Society 3(2): 501–508.
Johnston, C. 2008. Beyond the clearing: Towards a dwelt animal geography. Progress in Human Geography 32(5): 633–649.
Jones, R. 2009. Categories, borders and boundaries. Progress in Human Geography 33: 174–189.
Keulartz, J. 2009. Boundary work in ecological restoration. Environmental Philosophy 6(1): 35–55.
Knight, J. 2000. Natural enemies: People-wildlife conflicts in anthropological perspective. London: Routledge.
Latimer, J. 2013. Being alongside: Rethinking relations amongst different kinds. Theory, Culture & Society 30(7/8): 77–104.
Latour, B. 2004. Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lorimer, H. 2005. Cultural geography: The busyness of being “more-than-representational”. Progress in Human Geography 29: 83–94.
Lorimer, H. 2006. Herding memories of humans and animals. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 24: 497–518.
Lorimer, J. 2008. Living roofs and brownfield wildlife: Towards a fluid biogeography of UK nature conservation. Environment and Planning A 40: 2042–2060.
Lulka, D. 2004. Stabilizing the herd: Fixing the identity of nonhumans. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 22: 439–463.
Lulka, D. 2009. The residual humanism of hybridity: Retaining a sense of the earth. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34(3): 378–393.
Marvin, G. 2000. The problem of foxes: Legitimate and illegitimate killing in the English countryside. In Natural enemies: People-wildlife conflicts in anthropological perspective, ed. J. Knight, 189–211. London: Routledge.
Milton, K. 2000. Ducks out of water: Nature conservation as boundary maintenance. In Natural Enemies: People-wildlife conflicts in anthropological perspective, ed. J. Knight, 229–246. London: Routledge.
Noske, B. 1997. Beyond boundaries: Humans and animals. Montreal, Canada: Black Rose Books.
Palmer, C. 1996. Taming the wild profusion of existing things? A study of Foucault, power, and human/animal relationships. Environmental Ethics 23: 339–358.
Philo, C. 1995. Animals, geography, and the city: Notes on inclusions and exclusions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 13: 655–681.
Philo, C., and C. Wilbert. 2000. Animal spaces, beastly places: An introduction. In Animal spaces, beastly places: New geographies of human-animal relations, ed. C. Philo, and C. Wilbert, 1–34. London: Routledge.
Provinciaal Bestuur van Gelderland. 2002. Flora en Fauna in Gelderland Deel 2: Faunabeheer en schadebestrijding. Arnhem (In Dutch).
Rinfret, S. 2009. Controlling animals: Power, foucault, and species management. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal 22(6): 571–578.
Swart, J.A.A., and J. Keulartz. 2011. Wild animals in our backyard: A contextual approach to the intrinsic value of animals. Acta Biotheoretica 59: 185–200.
Thompson, C. 2002. When Elephants stand for competing philosophies of nature: Amboseli National Park, Kenya. In Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices, ed. J. Law, and A. Mol, 166–190. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
Thrift, N. 2008. Non-Representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.
Turnhout, E., C. Waterton, K. Neves, and M. Buizer. 2013. Rethinking biodiversity: From goods and services to “living with”. Conservation Letters 6: 154–161.
Urbanik, J. 2012. Placing animals: An introduction to the geography of human-animal relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
Vieira, M. 2011. Black bear data analysis unit management plan, northern front range unit DAU B-3, 34. Colorado: Colorado Divisions of Wildlife.
Von Drehle, D. 2013. America’s pest problem: It’s time to cull the herd. Time Magazine.
Whatmore, S., and L. Thorne. 1998. Wild(er)ness: Reconfiguring the geographies of wildlife. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 23: 435–454.
Wolch, J., and J. Emel. 1998. Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boonman-Berson, S. (2016). Blurred Boundaries in Wildlife Management Practices. In: Bovenkerk, B., Keulartz, J. (eds) Animal Ethics in the Age of Humans. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44206-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44206-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44205-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44206-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)