Advertisement

Peer Mentoring: A Source of Support for Pre-service EFL Teachers

Chapter
  • 876 Downloads
Part of the English Language Education book series (ELED)

Abstract

This chapter reports on a comprehensive research study whose aims were to investigate how a peer-mentoring model might influence pre-service EFL teachers’ perceptions of the amount of support they receive from their peers. The study sheds light on the use of peer mentoring as a model for supporting beginning teachers and its effectiveness in a specific Asian context.

Keywords

Focus Group Emotional Support Teaching Practice Student Teacher Lesson Plan 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, N. A., Barksdale, M. A., & Hite, C. E. (2005). Preservice teachers’ observations of cooperating teachers and peers while participating in an early field experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(4), 97–117.Google Scholar
  2. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–128.Google Scholar
  3. Bullough, J. R. V., Young, J., Birrell, J. R., Cecil Clark, D., Winston Egan, M., Erickson, L., … Welling, M. (2003). Teaching with a peer: A comparison of two models of student teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(1), 57–73.Google Scholar
  4. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. D. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Dinsmore, J., & Wenger, K. (2006). Relationships in preservice teacher preparation: From cohorts to communities. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(1), 57–74.Google Scholar
  6. Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Forbes, C. T. (2004). Peer mentoring in the development of beginning secondary science teachers: Three case studies. Mentoring and Tutoring, 12(2), 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gimbert, B. G. (2001). Learning to teach: The lived experience of being an intern in a professional development school. Ph.D dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=728932881&Fmt=7&clientId=20806&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
  9. Goodnough, K., Osmond, P., Dibbon, D., Glassman, M., & Stevens, K. (2009). Exploring a trial model of student teaching: Preservice teachers and cooperating teacher perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Green, J., Willis, K., Hughes, E., Small, R., Welch, N., Gibbs, L., et al. (2007). Generating best evidence from qualitative research: The role of data analysis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 31(6), 545–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Howey, K. R., & Zimpher, N. L. (1999). Pervasive problems and issues in teacher education. In G. A. Griffin (Ed.), The education of teachers: Ninety eighth yearbook of National Society for the study of education (pp. 279–305). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Imig, D. G., & Switzer, T. J. (1996). Changing teacher education programs: Restructuring collegiate-based teacher education. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 213–226). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  13. Keogh, M. D. (2005). Factors influencing pre-service teachers’ levels of reflective thinking. Ph.D, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=920928781&Fmt=7&clientId=20806&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
  14. Knezevic, A., & Scholl, M. (1996). Learning to teach together: Teaching to learn together. In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 79–97). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kram, K. E., & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring alternatives: The roles of peer relationships in career development. The Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 110–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  17. Kurtts, S. A., & Levin, B. B. (2000). Using peer coaching with preservice teachers to develop reflective practice and collegial support. Teacher Education, 11(3), 297–310.Google Scholar
  18. Laker, A., Laker, J. C., & Lea, S. (2008). Sources of support for pre-service teachers during school experience. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16(2), 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Le Cornu, R. (2005). Engaging pre-service teachers in mentoring one another. Mentoring and Tutoring, 13(3), 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Miller, M. (2008). Problem-based conversations: Using preservice teachers’ problems as a mechanism for their professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(4), 77–98.Google Scholar
  23. Munson, B. R. (1998). Peers observing peers: The better way to observe teachers. Contemporary Education, 69(2), 108–110.Google Scholar
  24. Stillisano, J. R. (2004). Mentoring preservice teachers: Opportunities for professional learning and growth in professional development schools. (Ed.D.), Ball State University, Muncie, IN. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=828404081&Fmt=7&clientId=20806&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
  25. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Vacilotto, S., & Cummings, R. (2007). Peer coaching in TEFL/TESL programmes. ELT Journal, 61(2), 153–160. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccm008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Valencia, S. W., Martin, S. D., Place, N. A., & Grossman, P. (2009). Complex interactions in student teaching: Lost opportunities for learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 304–322. doi: 10.1177/0022487109336543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Walsh, K., Elmslie, L., & Tayler, C. (2002). Pairs on practicum (trial): Early childhood students collaborate with peers in preschool/kindergarden. Paper presented at the AARE conference, Brisbane, Queensland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationThe University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations