Peer Mentoring for Pre-service Teachers: Developing Professional Practice

Part of the English Language Education book series (ELED)


This chapter provides a comprehensive research example that investigates how a peer-mentoring model has influenced pre-service EFL teachers’ professional practice. A mixed method design, that included both qualitative and quasi-experimental techniques, was used to investigate the impact of a formal peer mentoring intervention program on participants’ professional practice during the practicum. The study sheds light on the use of peer mentoring as a model for developing beginning teachers’ professional practice and its effectiveness in a specific Asian context.


Professional Practice Classroom Environment Professional Responsibility Wilks Lambda Instruction Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anderson, N. A., Barksdale, M. A., & Hite, C. E. (2005). Preservice teachers’ observations of cooperating teachers and peers while participating in an early field experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(4), 97–117.Google Scholar
  2. Benedetti, T. A. (1999). An investigation of peer coaching in the foreign language student teaching practicum. (Ph.D.), The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA. Retrieved from
  3. Bowman, C. L. (1995). The effect of peer coaching on the preservice teacher education early field experience program. (Ph.D), The Ohio State University, USA. Retrieved from
  4. Bowman, C. L., & McCormick, S. (2000). Comparison of peer coaching versus traditional supervision effects. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 256–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Britton, L. R., & Anderson, K. A. (2010). Peer coaching and pre-service teachers: Examining an underutilised concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 306–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bullough, J. R. V., Young, J., Birrell, J. R., Cecil Clark, D., Winston Egan, M., Erickson, L., … Welling, M. (2003). Teaching with a peer: A comparison of two models of student teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(1), 57–73.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, D. T., & Riecken, H. W. (2006). Quasi-experimental design. In D. de Vaus (Ed.), Research design (pp. 270–303). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Cheung, H. Y. (2008). Measuring the professional identity of Hong Kong in-service teachers. Journal of In-Service Education, 34(3), 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaurn.Google Scholar
  10. Dang, T. K. A. (2013). Identity in activity: Examining teacher professional identity formation in the paired-placement of student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30(0), 47–59. Scholar
  11. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  12. Danielson, C. (1999). Components of professional practice. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  13. Day, R. R. (1990). Teacher observation in second language teacher education. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 43–61). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Eisen, M.-J. (1999). Peer learning partnerships: A qualitative case study of teaching partners’ professional development efforts. (Ed.D.), Columbia University Teachers College, New York, NY, USA. Retrieved from
  15. Forbes, C. T. (2004). Peer mentoring in the development of beginning secondary science teachers: Three case studies. Mentoring and Tutoring, 12(2), 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gemmell, J. C. (2003). Building a professional learning community in preservice teacher education: Peer coaching and video analysis. (Ed.D), University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA. Retrieved from
  17. Goodnough, K., Osmond, P., Dibbon, D., Glassman, M., & Stevens, K. (2009). Exploring a triad model of student teaching: Pre-service teacher and cooperating teacher perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 285–296. Scholar
  18. Haigh, M., & Tuck, B. (1999). Assessing student teachers’ performance in practicum. Paper presented at the AARE, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  19. Hale, L. V. (1997). A study of peer group clinical supervision for secondary mathematics education practicum teachers. (Ph.D.), The University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin, USA. Retrieved from
  20. Harnish, D., & Wild, L. A. (1994). Mentoring strategies for faculty development. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 191–201.Google Scholar
  21. Hasbrouck, J. E. (1997). Mediated peer coaching for training preservice teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 31(2), 251–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jenkins, J. M., Garn, A., & Jenkins, P. (2005). Preservice teacher observations in peer coaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24(1), 2–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jenkins, J. M., & Veal, M. L. (2002). Preservice teachers’ PCK development during peer coaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22(1), 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, K. E. (1996). The vision versus the reality: The tensions of the TESOL practicum. In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 30–49). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kettle, B., & Sellars, N. (1996). The development of student teachers’ practical theory of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurtts, S. A., & Levin, B. B. (2000). Using peer coaching with preservice teachers to develop reflective practice and collegial support. Teacher Education, 11(3), 297–310.Google Scholar
  27. Lasater, C. A. (1994). Observation feedback and analysis of teaching practice: Case studies of early childhood student teachers as peer tutors during a preservice teaching practicum. (Ph.D), The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA. Retrieved from
  28. Le, V. C. (2013). Great expectations: The TESOL practicum as a professional learning experience. TESOL Journal, 5(2), 199–224. doi: 10.1002/tesj.103.Google Scholar
  29. McAllister, E. A., & Neubert, G. A. (1995). New teachers helping new teachers: Pre-service peer coaching. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English and Communication.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, M. G. R. (1989). Peer clinical supervision in the initial experience. PhD Unpubished Ph.D, The University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Morgan, R. L., Gustafson, K. J., Hudson, P. J., & Sazberg, C. L. (1992). Peer coaching in a preservice special education program. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15(4), 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Munson, B. R. (1998). Peers observing peers: The better way to observe teachers. Contemporary Education, 69(2), 108–110.Google Scholar
  33. Nguyen, H. T. M., & Luong, Q. T. (2007). EFL student teachers’ challenges during practicum: A case study. Paper presented at the 2007 ETAK international conference, Kongju National University, Kongju, South Korea.Google Scholar
  34. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Pierce, T., & Miller, S. P. (1994). Using peer coaching in preservice practica. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17(4), 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Piraino, G. R., Jr. (2006). A qualitative study of differentiated teacher supervision’s impact on classroom instruction and pedagogy. (Ed.D.), University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. Retrieved from
  37. Rauch, K., & Whittaker, C. R. (1999). Observation and feedback during student teaching: Learning from peers. Action in Teacher Education, 21, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Slater, C. L., & Simmons, D. L. (2001). The design and implementation of a peer coaching program. American Secondary Education, 29(3), 67–76.Google Scholar
  39. St Clair, K. L. (1994). Faculty-to-faculty mentoring in the community college: An instructional component of faculty development. Community College Review, 22(3), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sullivan, P. J. (2000). Playfulness as mediation in communicative language teaching in Vietnamese classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Socio-cultural theory and second language learning (pp. 115–131). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Vacilotto, S., & Cummings, R. (2007). Peer coaching in TEFL/TESL programmes. ELT Journal, 61(2), 153–160. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccm008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vogt, F., & Rogalla, M. (2009). Developing adaptive teaching competency through coaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1051–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Walsh, K., Elmslie, L., & Tayler, C. (2002). Pairs on practicum (trial): Early childhood students collaborate with peers in preschool/kindergarten. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) conference, Brisbane, Queensland.Google Scholar
  45. Wynn, M. J., & Kromrey, J. (1999). Paired peer placement with peer coaching in early field experiences: Results of a four-year study. Teacher Education Quarterly, 26(1), 21–38.Google Scholar
  46. Wynn, M., & Kromrey, J. (2000). Paired peer placement with peer coaching to enhance prospective teacher’s professional growth in early field experience. Action in Teacher Education, 22, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zeichner, K. (1996). Designing educative practicum experiences for prospective teachers. In K. Zeichner, S. Melnick, & M. L. Gomez (Eds.), Currents of reform in preservice teacher education (pp. 215–234). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  48. Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, T., Bolhuis, S., & Bergen, T. C. M. (2008). Teacher learning through reciprocal peer coaching: An analysis of activity sequences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 982–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationThe University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations