Abstract
The overall aim of this chapter is to apply situational action theory (SAT) to the problem of crime prevention. We will briefly highlight some key shortcomings of contemporary crime prevention (e.g., problems with risk-focused prevention and the weak evidence-base), present the basic assumptions and explanatory propositions of SAT (Wikström in The explanation of crime: context, mechanisms and development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 61–107, 2006, When crime appears: the role of emergence, Routledge, New York, pp 53–72, 2011a, Analytical sociology: actions and networks, Wiley, West Sussex, pp 74–94, 2014), and apply the theory to the problem of creating a foundation for the development of effective crime prevention policies and practices. The purpose is not to produce a ‘what works’ publication, listing purported ‘risk factors’ (e.g., Welsh and Farrington in Preventing crime: what works for children, offenders, victims and places, Springer, Netherlands, pp 1–17, 2006) and discussing one by one their evidence-base (e.g., Sherman et al. in Evidence-based crime prevention. Revised edition, Routledge, London, 2006; Greenwood in Changing lives: delinquency prevention as crime-control policy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2006), or suggesting a ‘toolkit’ of different techniques to address particular crime problems (e.g., Smith and Clarke in The oxford handbook of crime prevention. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 291–315, 2012). There are already plenty of important publications of this kind. Instead the objective is to present a knowledge-based theoretical frame of reference that can underpin and guide the development and organization of crime prevention practise. We propose moving towards a more analytical approach, using SAT as a guiding framework for understanding which factors exert a causal influence on crime involvement and, importantly how they do so—the causal mechanism. We propose that using this framework policy makers and practitioners can better assess which of all suggested risk factors are implicated in crime causation (and how) and, building on this, devise policies and interventions based on how we can stop those factors from causing crime (intervene in the causal mechanism). We suggest that a more analytical, mechanism-based approach to crime prevention can help advance prevention science beyond risk factors and better guide the development and implementation of effective crime prevention practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For examples of some previous efforts to focus and organise crime prevention, see Ekblom’s (1994) attempt at a crime prevention classification scheme, and Wikström and Torstensson’s (1999) attempt to integrate developmental and situational approaches within a comprehensive framework for the advancement of local crime prevention.
- 2.
Regarding the problem of translating causal claims into policy, see Sampson et al. (2013).
- 3.
For example, by 2013 the Campbell Crime and Justice group had conducted more than 30 systematic reviews (Welsh and Rocque 2013: 261) covering a wide array of disparate and unrelated intervention measures including boot camps, DNA testing, hot spots policing, drug courts, early family/parent training, parental imprisonment, mentoring and human trafficking, just to name a few.
- 4.
Meaning it applies to all acts of crime (general), focuses on the interaction between people (propensities) and places (environmental inducements) (dynamic), and emphasizes the causal processes which bring about crime (mechanism-based).
- 5.
For a critical discussion of ‘opportunity’ (routine activity and rational choice) theories as an explanation of human action and crime, see Wikström and Treiber (2015).
References
Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M., DeWall, C. N., & Oaten, M. (2006). Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1773–1802.
Blakemore, S.-J., & Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: Implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(3–4), 296–312.
Bunge, M. (2001). In M. Mahner (Ed.), Scientific realism: Selected essays by Mario Bunge. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
Bunge, M. (2006). Chasing reality: Strife over realism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Bunge, S. A., Dudukovic, N. M., Thomason, M. E., Vaidya, C. J., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002). Immature frontal lobe contributions to cognitive control in children: Evidence from fMRI. Neuron, 33(2), 301–311.
Bunge, S. A., & Wallis, J. D. (2008). Neuroscience of rule-guided behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Casey, B., Giedd, J., & Thomas, K. (2000) Structural and functional brain development and its relation to cognitive development. Biological Psychology, 54, 241–257.
Constantine-Paton, M., & Cline, H. T. (1998). LTP and activity-dependent synaptogenesis: the more alike they are, the more different they become. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8(1), 139–148.
Cullen, F. T., Wright, J., & Blevins, K. (2008). Introduction: Taking stock of criminological theory. In F. T. Cullen, J. Wright, & K. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory. Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 15, pp. 1–34). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Eisner, M. P. (2009). No effects in independent prevention trials: Can we reject the cynical view? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5(2), 163–183.
Ekblom, P. (1994). Proximal circumstances: A mechanism-based classification of crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, 2, 185–232.
Ellis, L., Beaver, K., & Wright, J. (2009). Handbook of crime correlates. San Diego: Academic Press.
Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., & Ttofi, M. M. (2012). Risk and protective factors for offending. In B. C. Welsh & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), The oxford handbook of crime prevention (pp. 46–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farrington, D. P., & Welsh, B. C. (2006). Saving children from a life of crime: Early risk factors and effective interventions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fuster, J. (1997). The prefrontal cortex: Anatomy, physiology, and neuropsychology of the frontal lobe (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
Goldberg, E. (2009). The new executive brain: Frontal lobes in a complex world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greenwood, P. W. (2006). Changing lives: Delinquency prevention as crime-control policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 495–525.
Heatherton, T. F., & Wagner, D. D. (2011). Cognitive neuroscience of self-regulation failure. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(3), 132–139.
Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 174–180.
Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960.
Hough, M. (2010). Gold standard or fool’s gold? The pursuit of certainty in experimental criminology. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 10(1), 11–22.
Johnson, M. H., & De Haan, M. (2015). Developmental cognitive neuroscience: An introduction. Chichester: Wiley.
Klingberg, T. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(7), 317–324.
Kraemer, H. C., Lowe, K. K., & Kupfer, D. J. (2005). To your health: How to understand what research tells us about risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laub, J. H. (2004). The life course of criminology in the United States: The American Society of Criminology 2003 Presidential Address. Criminology, 42(1), 1–26.
Luna, B., Padmanabhan, A., & O’Hearn, K. (2010). What has fMRI told us about the development of cognitive control through adolescence? Brain and Cognition, 72(1), 101–113.
Malenka, R. C., & Nicoll, A. R. (1999). Long-term potentiation—A decade of progress? Science, 285(5435), 1870–1874.
Moffitt, T. E., & Henry, B. (1989). Neuropsychological assessment of executive functions in self-reported delinquents. Development and Psychopathology, 1(02), 105–118.
Morgan, A. B., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2000). A meta-analytic review of the relation between antisocial behavior and neuropsychological measures of executive function. Clinical Psychology Review, 20(1), 113–136.
Ogilvie, J. M., Stewart, A. L., Chan, R. C., & Shum, D. H. (2011). Neuropsychological measures of executive function and antisocial behaviour: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 49(4), 1063–1107.
Morrison, A. B., & Chein, J. M. (2011). Does working memory training work? The promise and challenges of enhancing cognition by training working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(1), 46–60.
Muraven, M. (2010). Building self-control strength: Practicing self-control leads to improved self-control performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 465–468.
Murray, J., Farrington, D. P., & Eisner, M. P. (2009). Drawing conclusions about causes from systematic reviews of risk factors: The Cambridge Quality Checklists. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5(1), 1–23.
Psillos, S. (2002). Causation and explanation. Montreal, Quebec: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Rutter, M. (2007). Proceeding from observed correlation to causal inference: The use of natural experiments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 377–395.
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.
Sampson, R. J., Winship, C., & Knight, C. (2013). Translating causal claims: Principles and strategies for policy-relevant criminology. Criminology & Public Policy, 12(4), 587–616.
Sherman, L. W., Farrington, D. P., Welsh, B. C., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). Evidence-based crime prevention. Revised edition. London: Routledge.
Smith, M. J., & Clarke, R. V. (2012). Situational crime prevention: Classifying techniques using ‘good enough’ theory. In B. C. Welsh & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of crime prevention (pp. 291–315). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28(1), 78–106.
Sturman, D. A., & Moghaddam, B. (2011). The neurobiology of adolescence: Changes in brain architecture, functional dynamics, and behavioral tendencies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(8), 1704–1712.
Tranel, D., Anderson, S., & Benton, A. (1994). Development of the concept of “executive function” and its relationship to the frontal lobes. In F. Boller & H. Spinnler (Eds.), Integrated developmental and life course theories of offending. Advances in Criminological Theory (Vol. 14, pp. 211–246). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Treiber, K. (2011). The neuroscientific basis of situational action theory. In K. M. Beaver & A. Walsh (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to biosocial theories of crime (pp. 213–246). Surrey: Ashgate Press.
Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2001). Toward an evidence-based approach to preventing crime. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578(1), 158–173.
Welsh, B. C., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Evidence-based crime prevention. In B. C. Welsh & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works for children, offenders, victims and places (pp. 1–17). Netherlands: Springer.
Welsh, B. C., & Rocque, M. (2014). When crime prevention harms: a review of systematic reviews. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(3), 245–266.
Wikström, P.-O. H. (2006). Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: Situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime. In P.-O. H. Wikström & R. J. Sampson (Eds.), The explanation of crime: Context, mechanisms and development (pp. 61–107). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wikström, P.-O. H. (2007a). In search of causes and explanations of crime. In R. King & E. Wincup (Eds.), Doing research on crime and justice (2nd ed., pp. 117–140). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wikström, P.-O. H. (2007b). The social ecology of crime: The role of the environment in crime causation. In H. Schneider (Ed.), Internationales handbuch der kriminologie (pp. 333–358). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Wikström, P.-O. H. (2011a). Does everything matter? Addressing problems of causation and explanation in the study of crime. In J. M. McGloin, C. J. Silverman, & L. W. Kennedy (Eds.), When crime appears: The role of emergence (pp. 53–72). New York, NY: Routledge.
Wikström, P.-O. H. (2011b). Social sources of crime propensity: A study of the collective efficacy of families, schools and neighbourhoods. In T. Bliesener, A. Beelman, & M. Stemmler (Eds.), Antisocial behaviour and crime: Contributions of developmental and evaluation research to prevention and intervention (pp. 109–122). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe Publishing.
Wikström, P.-O. H. (2014). Why crime happens: A situational action theory. In G. Manzo (Ed.), Analytical sociology: Actions and networks (pp. 74–94). West Sussex: Wiley.
Wikström, P.-O. H., Oberwittler, D., Treiber, K., & Hardie, B. (2012). Breaking rules: The social and situational dynamics of young people’s urban crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wikström, P.-O. H., & Torstensson, M. (1999). Local crime prevention and its national support: Organisation and direction. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 7, 459–481.
Wikström, P.-O. H., & Sampson, R. (2003). Social mechanisms of community: Influences on crime and pathways in criminality. In B. Lahey, T. Moffitt, & A. Caspi (Eds.), Causes of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency (pp. 118–148). New York: The Guilford Press.
Wikström, P.-O. H., & Treiber, K. (2008). Offending behaviour programmes. London: Youth Justice Board.
Wikström, P.-O. H., & Treiber, K. (2015). Situational theories. The importance of interactions and action mechanisms in the explanation of crime. In A. Piquero (Ed.), Handbook of criminological theory. New York: Wiley.
Wikström, P.-O. H., & Treiber, K. (forthcoming). The dynamics of change: Criminogenic interactions and life course patterns in crime. In D. P. Farrington (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of developmental and life course theories of crime. Oxford University Press.
Wikström, P-O H., & Treiber, K. (2016). Social disadvantage and crime: A criminological puzzle, American Behavioral Scientist, 0002764216643134.
Zelazo, P. D., Müller, U., Frye, D., & Marcovitch, S. (2003). The development of executive function in early childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68(3), i–151.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wikström, PO.H., Treiber, K. (2017). Beyond Risk Factors: An Analytical Approach to Crime Prevention. In: Teasdale, B., Bradley, M. (eds) Preventing Crime and Violence. Advances in Prevention Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44124-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44124-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44122-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44124-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)