Abstract
Crime prevention through environmental design is among the most resilient theories of the modern era, primarily because it works so well in practice. It reduces the physical opportunity for crime through architecture and urban planning. In its earliest years, CPTED theory shifted immediately toward a target hardening orientation and away from its social ecology roots. That gave rise to, or accompanied, a host of other opportunity-based approaches that now represent a new movement in criminological theory. But in spite of this theoretical bifurcation, the original strains of social ecology and the neighborhood-building visions of the CPTED pioneers persisted. The latest expansion of CPTED theory emerged in 1997 in the form of 2nd Generation CPTED, which rediscovers social ecology and creates a more balanced approach to neighborhood crime prevention. Today it is implemented in a new urban planning and prevention method called SafeGrowth.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It may even be said that the work of influential criminologist Edwin Sutherland, particularly his differential association theory, has a University of Chicago origin. Sutherland worked at the University for 5Â years alongside Clifford Shaw and other social ecologists (Sutherland 1947; Shaw and McKay 1942).
- 2.
At the time there were already studies investigating the concept of physical territoriality, most notably Hall’s The Hidden Dimension (1966) and Ardry’s The Territorial Imperative (1966). However, none of that work survives today in any coherent form in latter-day CPTED theory to explain why territoriality happens in the first place and how we might encourage it when it does not.
- 3.
Jacobs never associated with the CPTED movement, nor did she write on the topic. Her connection to CPTED was made retroactively by historians and by those early CPTED writers who were influenced by her work.
- 4.
Jacobs was the first to popularize the concepts that became CPTED and Angel’s (1968) research was the first empirical work to explicitly link them to crime prevention. Jeffery (1971) was the first to coin the phrase CPTED and write from a criminological perspective. It was from Oscar Newman’s Defensible Space (1972) where the tactics of 1st Generation CPTED emerged. Likewise, Elizabeth Woods, a former student at the University of Chicago and Chicago’s director of housing, wrote about social housing, design and balanced neighborhoods (1960). Clearly there is no single author of ideas behind early CPTED; all the pioneers had influence and all made significant contributions.
- 5.
This does not obviously apply to all training. A few updated programs do add material about social programs. However, most do not and those that do seldom employ coherent or systematic strategies as outlined in 2nd Generation CPTED theory. A review of the topics listed in the majority of CPTED courses illustrates to extent to which physical opportunity reduction, lighting, fencing, and access control dominate the curricula. See an example at http://www.cptedtraining.net/. Accessed February 23, 2014.
- 6.
Even the preeminent University of Chicago scholar, Amos Hawley, in his elegant essay on human ecology, notes this trend when he laments that sociologists became obsessed with the spatial dimensions of city life to the point where human ecology is now thought to be primarily the study of spatial patterns (Hawley 1986: 1). It will become clear later in this chapter how 2nd Generation CPTED, while not as expansive as Hawley’s view, begins the reintegration of CPTED with social ecology.
- 7.
It is interesting to note there were some significant successes identified in those early studies. See the evaluation on Portland by Kushmuk et al. 1981.
- 8.
There are many histories written about the social prevention programs of the Chicago Area Project. Started in the 1930s by Clifford Shaw, an important social ecology theorist, the project is still underway today. http://www.chicagoareaproject.org/historical-look-chicago-area-project. Accessed February 25, 2014.
- 9.
Although he did not study threshold crime effects directly, Sampson’s exhaustive text on Chicago’s neighborhoods cites research on urban transformation and neighborhood tipping points regarding racial homogeneity and poverty.
- 10.
Conference presentations and various ICA publications are posted on the website of the International CPTED Association: http://www.cpted.net.
References
Angel, S. (1968). Discouraging crime through city planning. Working paper no. 75. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley. February.
Ardry, R. (1966). The territorial imperative. New York: Athenium.
Atlas, R. (2013). 21 st Century security and CPTED: Designing for critical infrastructure protection and crime prevention (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
Brantingham, P., & Brantingham, P. (1981). Patterns in crime. New York: Macmillan.
Clarke, R. V. (2013). Opportunity makes the thief. Really? And so what? Crime Science, 1(3), 1–9.
Cleveland, G. & Saville, G. (1997). 2nd generation CPTED: An antidote to the social Y2K virus of urban design. Paper presented at the 2nd annual international CPTED conference, Orlando, FL, December 14–16.
Cozens, P. (2008). Crime prevention through environmental design. In Wortley, R. & Mazerolle, L. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 153–194). Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.
Cozens, P., Saville, G., & Hillier, B. (2005). Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED): A review and modern bibliography. Journal of Property Management, 23(5), 328–356.
Crowe, T. (2000). Crime prevention through environmental design: Applications of architectural design and space management concepts (2nd ed.). New York: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Crowe, T., & Zahm, D. (1994). Crime prevention through environmental design. Land Development, Fall, 22(7), 23–24.
Decker, J. F. (1972). Curbside deterrence: An analysis of the effect of a slug rejectory device, coin view window and warning labels on slug usage in New York City meters. Criminology, 10(2), 127–142.
Dickout, D. (2006). A communty based approach to creating safer nightlife spaces: 2nd Gen CPTED in action. The CPTED Journal, 2(1), 25–33.
Edwards, P. & Wraith, R. (2007). Building a new community: Making it happen together. Presentation to the 2007 Conference of the Public Health Agency of Canada. Coalition of Community Safety, Health and Well-being, March 5, Winnipeg, Canada.
Ekblom, P. (2006). Crime prevention through environmental design—Time for an upgrade? In 17th annual international conference on problem-oriented policing, Madison, Wisconsin, September.
Felson, M. (2006). The ecosystem for organized crime. HEUNI 25, The 25th Anniversary Lecture, The United Nations European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control, Helsinki, Finland, October.
Ferman, B., & Kaylor, P. (2001). Building the spatial community: A case study of neighborhood institutions. Policy Studies, 18, 53–70.
Feyerabend, P. (2010). Against method. London: Verso.
Galster, G. C., Quercia, R. G., & Cortes, A. (2009). Identifying neighborhood thresholds: An empirical exploration. Housing Policy Debate, 11, 701–732.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
Hawdon, J., & Ryan, J. (2009). Social capital, social control, and changes in victimization rates. Crime and Delinquency, 55(4), 526–549.
Hawley, H. A. (1986). Human ecology: A theoretical essay. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hino, K., Yamamoto, T., & Hoshino, S. (2008). Sustainability of activities for community safety: Two successful case studies. Paper presented to the Mayor’s Caucus Executive Committee, The 21st EAROPH World Planning and Human Settlement Congress. Himeji, Japan. October 21–24.
Immergluck, D., & Smith, G. (2006). The impact of single-family mortgage foreclosures on neighborhood crime. Housing Studies., 21(6), 851–866.
Jacobs, J. (1961). Death and life of great American cities. New York: Collier.
Jeffery, C. R. (1971). Crime prevention through environmental design. Beverly Hills, C.A.: Sage Publications.
Kelling, G., & Coles, C. (1996). Fixing broken windows: Restoring order and reducing crime in our communities. New York: Free Press.
Kushmuk, J. & Whittemore, S. U. L. (1981). A re-evaluation of crime prevention through environmental design program in Portland, Oregon: Executive summary. December, 1981. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Lelieveldt, H., et al. (2009). Civic organizations as political actors: Mapping the Predicting the involvement of civic organizations in neighborhood problem-solving and co-production. Urban Affairs Review, 45(1), 3–24.
Levan, V. (2004). Second-generation CPTED at work: Building community culture bridges in Parisian Belleville. The CPTED Journal., 3(1), 3–14.
Lilly, R., Cullen, F. T., & Ball, R. A. (2011). Criminological theory: Context and consequences (pp. 38–39). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mayhew, H. (1862). London labour and the london poor. Vol. IV: Those that will not work. Comprising prostitutes, thieves, swindlers, and beggars. London: Griffin Bohn, 1861–1862 (Reprinted, New York: Dover Publications, 1968).
Mayhew P. M., Clarke, R. V. G., Sturman, A., & Hough, J. M. (1976). Crime as opportunity. Home Office Research Study, No 34. H.M.S.O, London.
Moffat, R. (1983). Crime prevention through environmental design—A management perspective. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 25(4), 19–31.
Mutchnick, R., Martin, R., & Austin, T. W. (2008). Criminological thought: Pioneers past and present. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Merton, R. K. (1995). Opportunity structure: The emergence, diffusion and differentiation of a sociological concept, 19305-19505. In F. Adler & W. S. Laufer (Eds.), Advanced in criminological theory: The legacy of anomie theory (pp. 3–78). New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.
Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space: Crime Prevention through urban design. New York: Collier Books.
Newman, O. (1981). Community of interest. New York: Anchor Books.
Park, R. E. (1915). The city: Suggestions for the investigation of behavior in the city environment. American Journal of Sociology, 20(5), 577–612.
Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W., & McKenzie, R. D. (1925). The city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Quetelet, L. A. J. (1842). Treatise on man and the development of his faculties. Edinburgh: W. and R. Chambers.
Reynald, D. M., & Elffersall, H. (2009). The future of Newman’s defensible space theory: Linking defensible space and the routine activities of place. European Journal of Criminology, 6(1), 25–46.
Reynald, D. M. (2010). Guardians on guardianship: factors affecting the willingness to supervise, the ability to detect potential offenders, and the willingness to intervene. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 358–390.
Rigakos, G. S. (2007). The San Romanoway Community Revitalization Project: Executive Report, 2006. http://srra.ca/files/pdf/finalreport_Rigakos2006.pdf. Accessed 26 February, 2014.
Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American City: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multi-level study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5382), 918–924.
Sarkissian, W. (2000). Australian capital territory, crime prevention through environmental design resource manual. ACT Department of Urban Services, Canberra, Australia. http://apps.actpla.act.gov.au/tplan/planning_register/register_docs/resmanual.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2014.
Sarkissian, W. (2003). Stories in a park—Second-generation CPTED in practice: reducing crime and stigma through community storytelling. The CPTED Journal, 2(1), 34–45.
Saskatoon. (2010). SafeGrowth and CPTED in Saskatoon: Crime prevention through environmental design guidelines. An illustrated guide to safer development in our community. City of Saskatoon, Canada. http://www.saskatoon.ca/DEPARTMENTS/Community%20Services/PlanningDevelopment/Documents/Neighbourhood%20Planning/Neighbourhood%20Safety/CPTED%20Guidelines_WEB.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2014.
Saville, G. (1996). The tipping point: Searching for a neighborhood’s crime threshold. Subject to Debate. Police Executive Research Forum. Washington, DC: October.
Saville, G. (2009). SafeGrowth: Moving forward in neighborhood development. Built Environment, 35(3), 386–402.
Saville, G. & Mangat, M. (2009). SafeGrowth: Creating safety and sustainability through community building and urban design. Community Safety Paper Series. New York: Local Initiative Support Corporation.
Saville, G., & Cleveland, C. (2006). CPTED and the social city: The future of capacity building. The CPTED Journal, 2(1), 50.
Saville, G., & Cleveland, G. (2013). Second generation CPTED. The rise and fall of opportunity theory (2nd Edn). In R. Atlas (Ed.), 21st century security and CPTED: Designing for critical infrastructure protection and crime prevention. New York: CRC Press.
Schlossman, S., Zellman, G., & Shavelson, R. (1984). Delinquency prevention in South Chicago: A fifty-year assessment of the Chicago area project. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Scott, M. S. (2000). Problem-oriented policing: reflections on the first 20 years (p. 2000). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
Shaw, C. R. (1929). Delinquency areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: A study of rates of delinquents in relation to different characteristics of local communities in American Cities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stark, R. (1987). Deviant places: A theory of the ecology of crime. Criminology, 25, 893–909.
Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Tempe, City. (2005). CPTED design guidelines, Tempe, Arizona. http://www.tempe.gov/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=1910. Accessed February 13, 2014.
von Soomeren, P. (2001). A European standard for the reduction of crime and fear of crime by urban planning and building design: ENV 14383-2. EU Commission: Hippokrates Programme. http://www.securefit.org/downloads/files/Soomeren_EuropeanStandard.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2014.
Spellman, W. (1993). Abandoned buildings: Magnets for crime? Journal of Criminal Justice, 21(5), 481–495.
St. Jean, P. (2007). Pockets of crime: Broken windows, collective efficacy and the criminal point of view. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sutherland, R. (1956). Critique of the theory. In A. Cohen, A. Lindesmith, & K. Schuessler (Eds.), The Sutherland papers (p. 31). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Tatian, P., et al. (2012). Building successful neighborhoods. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
Taylor, R. B., & Covington, J. (1988). Neighborhood changes in ecology and violence. Criminology, 26, 553–589.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saville, G. (2017). The Missing Link in CPTED Theory. In: Teasdale, B., Bradley, M. (eds) Preventing Crime and Violence. Advances in Prevention Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44124-5_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44124-5_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44122-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44124-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)