Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Hot Spots Policing: Theoretical Perspectives, Scientific Evidence, and Proper Implementation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Preventing Crime and Violence

Part of the book series: Advances in Prevention Science ((Adv. Prevention Science))

Abstract

In recent years, crime scholars and practitioners have pointed to the potential benefits of focusing police crime prevention efforts on crime places. Research suggests that there is significant clustering of crime in small places or “hot spots.” A number of researchers have argued that crime problems can be reduced more efficiently if police officers focused their attention to these deviant places. General deterrence and criminal opportunities theories are often applied to understand the crime control effectiveness of hot spots policing. The available evaluation evidence suggests that hot spots policing generates noteworthy crime reductions and these crime control benefits diffuse into areas immediately surrounding targeted crime hot spots. Moreover, problem-oriented policing interventions seem to generate larger crime control impacts when compared to interventions that simply increase levels of traditional police actions in crime hot spots. To improve their legitimacy in disadvantaged minority neighborhoods, police departments should engage collaborative, community problem-solving approaches to address crime hot spots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apel, R. J., & Nagin, D. (2011). General deterrence: A review of recent evidence. In J. Q. Wilson & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime and public policy (pp. 411–436). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Nagin, D. (1978). Deterrence and incapacitation: Estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A. (2001). The effects of hot spots policing on crime. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 104–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A. (2005). Hot spots policing and crime prevention: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 317–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A., & Bond, B. (2008). Policing crime and disorder hot spots: A randomized controlled trial. Criminology, 46, 577–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A., Hureau, D., & Papachristos, A. (2011a). The relevance of micro places to citywide robbery trends: A longitudinal analysis of robbery incidents at street corners and block faces in Boston. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A., Hureau, D., & Papachristos, A. (2011b). An ex-post-facto evaluation framework for place-based police interventions. Evaluation Review, 35, 592–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A., & Hureau, D. (2010). The concentration and stability of gun violence at micro places in Boston, 1980–2008. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A., & Hureau, D. (2014). The effects of hot spots policing on crime: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 31, 633–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A., & Weisburd, D. (2010). Policing problem places: Crime hot spots and effective prevention. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D., Waring, E., et al. (1999). Problem-oriented policing in violent crime places: A randomized controlled experiment. Criminology, 37, 541–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (Eds.). (1981). Environmental criminology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., & Wycoff, M. (1987). Policing Houston: Reducing fear and improving service. Crime & Delinquency, 33, 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caeti, T. (1999). Houston’s targeted beat program: A quasi-experimental test of police patrol strategies. Dissertation, Sam Houston State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Gorr, W., & Singh, P. (2003). Estimating intervention effects in varying risk settings: Do police raids reduce illegal drug dealing at nuisance bars? Criminology, 41, 257–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P. J. (1980). Research in criminal deterrence: Laying the groundwork for the second decade. In N. Morris & M. Tonry (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 2, pp. 211–268). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. V. (Eds.). (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, W. J., & Bull, J. L. (1975). Robbery deterrence: An applied behavioral science demonstration. La Jolla, CA: Western Behavioral Sciences Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Criminal Justice Commission. (1998). Beenleigh calls for service project: Evaluation report. Brisbane, QLD: Criminal Justice Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiTella, R., & Schargrodsky, E. (2004). Do police reduce crime? Estimates using the allocation of police forces after a terrorist attack. American Economic Review, 94, 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S., & Nagin, D. (2011). Imprisonment and crime: Can both be reduced? Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 13–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J. (2002). Preventing crime at places. In L. Sherman, D. Farrington, B. Welsh, et al. (Eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 241–294). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eck, J., & Weisburd, D. (1995). Crime places in crime theory. In J. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and place (pp. 1–34). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D., & Petrosino, A. (2001). The Campbell collaboration crime and justice group. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, D., Chatterton, M., & Pease, K. (1988). The Kirkholt burglary prevention project, Home Office crime prevention unit paper 13. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P. (1975). Crime, punishment, and deterrence. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-oriented policing. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, T. (1994). Problem-oriented policing and drug market locations. Crime Prevention Studies, 2, 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, B., Taylor, R., & Luongo, A. (2005). Police officers on drug corners in Philadelphia: Intended, diffusion, and displacement impacts. Justice Quarterly, 22, 427–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle, L., Price, J., & Roehl, J. (2000). Civil remedies and drug control: A randomized field trial in Oakland, California. Evaluation Review, 24, 212–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D. S. (2013). Deterrence in the 21st century: A review of the evidence. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 42, pp. 199–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pate, A., & Skogan, W. (1985). Coordinated community policing: The Newark experience. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R. (1987). The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly, 4, 173–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrosino, A., Boruch, R., Soydan, H., et al. (2001). Meeting the challenge of evidence-based policy: The Campbell collaboration. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 14–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, G., Spaar, S., & Briggs, L. (1988). The character of police work: Strategic and tactical implications. Boston: Center for Applied Social Research, Northeastern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Police Executive Research Forum. (2008). Violent crime in America: What we know about hot spots enforcement. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, J., Taniguchi, T., Groff, E., et al. (2011). The Philadelphia foot patrol experiment: A randomized controlled trial of police patrol effectiveness in violent crime hot spots. Criminology, 49, 795–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., Lawton, B., Taylor, R., et al. (2003). Multilevel longitudinal impacts of incivilities: Fear of crime, expected safety, and block satisfaction. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19, 237–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L., Buerger, M., & Gartin, P. (1989a). Beyond dial-a-cop: A randomized test of repeat call policing (RECAP). Washington, DC: Crime Control Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L., & Eck, J. (2002). Policing for crime prevention. In L. Sherman, D. Farrington, B. Welsh, et al. (Eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 295–329). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L., Gartin, P., & Buerger, M. (1989b). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L., & Rogan, D. (1995a). Effects of gun seizures on gun violence: ‘Hot spots’ patrol in Kansas City. Justice Quarterly, 12, 673–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L., & Rogan, D. (1995b). Deterrent effects of police raids on crack houses: A randomized controlled experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12, 755–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime hot spots: A randomized controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12, 625–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sviridoff, M., Sadd, S., Curtis, R., et al. (1992). The neighborhood effects of street-level drug enforcement: Tactical narcotics teams in New York. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W., & Frydl, K. (Eds.). (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W., & Meares, T. (2004). Lawful policing. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 66–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelman, W. (1995). Criminal careers of public places. In J. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Crime and place (pp. 115–144). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B., Koper, C., & Woods, D. (2011). A randomized controlled trial of different policing strategies at hot spots of violent crime. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 149–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. (1997). Social order and disorder of street-blocks and neighborhoods: Ecology, micro-ecology, and the systematic model of social disorganization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 113–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. (2001). Breaking away from broken windows. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R., & Gottfredson, S. (1986). Environment design, crime, and prevention: An examination of community dynamics. In A. J. Reiss & M. Tonry (Eds.), Communities and crime (pp. 387–416). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2001). Public trust and confidence in legal authorities. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19, 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. L. (2008). Place-based policing. Ideas in American policing series, no 9. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. L., Bushway, S., Lum, C., et al. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42, 283–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. L., & Eck, J. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 42–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. L., & Green, L. (1994). Defining the drug market: The case of the Jersey City DMAP system. In D. L. MacKenzie & C. Uchida (Eds.), Drugs and crime (pp. 61–76). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. L., & Green, L. (1995). Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City DMA experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12, 711–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. L., Maher, L., & Sherman, L. (1992). Contrasting crime general and crime specific theory: The case of hot spots of crime. Advances in Criminological Theory, 4, 45–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. L., Mastrofski, S., McNally, A. M., et al. (2003). Reforming to preserve: Compstat and strategic problem solving in American policing. Criminology & Public Policy, 2, 421–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd, D. L., Wyckoff, L., Ready, J., et al. (2006). Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology, 44, 549–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. B. (2001). Meta-analytic methods for criminology. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wycoff, M., & Skogan, W. (1986). Storefront police offices: The Houston field test. In D. Rosenbaum (Ed.), Community crime prevention (pp. 179–199). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F., & Hawkins, G. (1973). Deterrence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

    Anthony A. Braga

Authors
  1. Anthony A. Braga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony A. Braga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, Georgia State University Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

    Brent Teasdale

  2. Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA

    Mindy S. Bradley

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Braga, A.A. (2017). Hot Spots Policing: Theoretical Perspectives, Scientific Evidence, and Proper Implementation. In: Teasdale, B., Bradley, M. (eds) Preventing Crime and Violence. Advances in Prevention Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44124-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44124-5_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44122-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44124-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation