Abstract
Traditional criminology has focused on the criminal nature of offenders as a means for reducing crime. In contrast, situational crime prevention (SCP) is a process of multiple stages and seeks to understand where, when, and how crime incidents occur. Similar to epidemiology, SCP has sought to alter environments which host crime behavior in order to make them less suitable for offending. Based on an analysis of the incidence and distribution of a given crime problem, the SCP approach then identifies risk factors, formulates and implements appropriate solutions, and evaluates the results. In this way, the individual “propensity” of offenders, like individual diagnoses, becomes less important, at least as a means of prevention. This chapter discusses in more detail the situational crime prevention approach. Following a brief description of its historical development, the theoretical foundations are presented. An overview of the process and types of prevention techniques are then outlined followed by a discussion on the existing evidence of effectiveness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brantingham, P. L., Brantingham, P. J., & Taylor, W. (2005). Situational crime prevention as a key component in embedded crime prevention. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale, 47(2), 271–292.
Bowers, K. J., & Guerette, R. T. (2014). Effectiveness of situational crime prevention. In G. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice (pp. 1318–1329). New York: Springer.
Clarke, R. V. (1989). Theoretical background to crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) and situational crime prevention. In S. Geason, & P. R Wilson (eds.), Designing out crime: Crime prevention through environmental design (No. 3). Proceedings of a conference by Canberra. Australian Institute of Criminology (pp. 13–21), Sydney.
Clarke, R. V. (1995). Situational crime prevention. Crime and Justice, 19, 91–150.
Clarke, R. V. G. (Ed.). (1997). Situational crime prevention (pp. 53–70). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
Clarke, R. V., & Cornish, D. B. (1985). Modeling offenders’ decisions: A framework for research and policy. Crime and Justice, 6, 147–185.
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.
Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (2003). Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, 16, 41–96.
Crowe, T. D. & Zahm, D. L. (1994). Crime prevention through environmental design: NAHB Land Development Magazine.
Eck, J. E., & Guerette, R. T. (2012). Own the place, own the crime’ prevention: How evidence about place-based crime shifts the burden of prevention. In R. Loeber & B. C. Welsh (Eds.), The future of criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldstein, H. (1979). Improving policing: A problem-oriented approach. Crime & Delinquency, 25(2), 236–258.
Guerette, R. T., & Bowers, K. J. (2009). Assessing the extent of crime displacement and diffusion of benefits: A review of situational crime prevention evaluations*. Criminology, 47(4), 1331–1368.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.
Lanier, M. M. (2010). Epidemiological criminology (EpiCrim): Definition and application. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, 2(1), 63–103.
Lanier, M. M., Henry, S., & Desire’JM, A. (2014). Essential criminology. Philadelphia: Perseus Books Group.
Lanier, M. M., Pack, R. P., & Akers, T. A. (2010). Epidemiological criminology: Drug use among African American gang members. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 16, 6–16.
Mayhew, P. (1979). Defensible space: The current status of a crime prevention theory. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 18(3), 150–159.
Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space (p. 264). New York: Macmillan.
Newman, O. (1996). Creating defensible space. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research.
Smith, M. J., & Clarke, R. V. (2012). Situational crime prevention: Classifying techniques using good enough theory. In B. C. Welsh & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of crime prevention (pp. 291–315). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spelman, W., & Eck, J. E. (1987). Problem-oriented policing. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
Welsh, B., & Farrington, D. (2008a). Effects of closed circuit television surveillance on crime: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 4(17).
Welsh, B., & Farrington, D. (2008b). Effects of improved street lighting on crime: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 4(13).
Wood, E. (1961). Housing design, a social theory. New York: Citizens’ Housing and Planning Counsel of New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shariati, A., Guerette, R.T. (2017). Situational Crime Prevention. In: Teasdale, B., Bradley, M. (eds) Preventing Crime and Violence. Advances in Prevention Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44124-5_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44124-5_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44122-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44124-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)