Skip to main content

The Critique of Mindfulness and the Mindfulness of Critique: Paying Attention to the Politics of Our Selves with Foucault’s Analytic of Governmentality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Mindfulness

Part of the book series: Mindfulness in Behavioral Health ((MIBH))

Abstract

This chapter examines the analytic of governmentality drawn from Michel Foucault’s work. It invites consideration of the analytical possibilities which might be developed through a twofold task: the critique of mindfulness and the mindfulness of critique. The chapter first unpacks Foucault’s account of neoliberalism as a mode of governmentality that is directed at the production of the subjectivity of homo economicus. This will shed light on why mindfulness is so malleable and adaptable across diverse settings today. The chapter then connects Foucault’s account of neoliberalism with his reevaluation of the ethical practices of spiritual self-cultivation in antiquity. This will clarify how an analytic of governmentality turns on an understanding of the subject as constituted by historically contingent practices, and invites an analysis of contemporary mindfulness as the emergent and contested outcome of techniques of domination and techniques of the self. A Foucauldian understanding of the subject is accompanied by an understanding of ethics as critical practice. By connecting Foucault’s curiosity about neoliberalism with his curiosity about ethical self-cultivation, the chapter will propose some ways by which the practices of critique and mindfulness might reciprocally nourish one another as the critique of mindfulness and the mindfulness of critique. The chapter concludes with some reflections on how this ethos of critical mindfulness might relate to the challenges facing scholars and researchers of mindfulness working within the increasingly corporatized institution of the university, which is a key site and relay point for the production of knowledge on mindfulness in the contemporary world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    MNDFL http://mndflmeditation.com.

  2. 2.

    I have attempted to illustrate this in a media commentary, ‘Mindfulness and Self-Care: Why Should I Care?’ http://patheos.com/blogs/americanbuddhist/2016/04/mindfulness-and-self-care-why-should-i-care.html.

References

  • Afary, J., & Anderson, K. (2005). Foucault and the Iranian revolution: Gender and the seductions of Islam. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. (2010). Governmentality of youth. Policy Futures in Education, 8(5), 528–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, S. (2014). Happiness as enterprise: An essay on neoliberal life. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrette, J. (2000). Foucault and religion: Spiritual corporality and political spirituality. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrette, J., & King, R. (2005). Selling spirituality: The silent takeover of religion. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury, S., & Slaby, J. (Eds.). (2012). Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester: West Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W. (2015). The happiness industry: How the government and big business sold us well-being. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilts, A. (2011). From ‘entrepreneur of the self’ to ‘care of the self’: neo-liberal governmentality and foucault’s ethics. Foucault Studies, 12, 130–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D. (2015, November 9). They want kids to be robots: Meet the new education craze designed to distract you from overtesting. Salon. Retrieved from http://www.salon.com/2015/11/08/they_want_kids_to_be_robots_meet_the_new_education_craze_designed_to_distract_you_from_overtesting/.

  • Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 10(4), 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The foucault reader (pp. 32–50). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988a). The care of the self. Translated by R. Hurley. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988b). The return of morality. In L. Kritzman (Ed.), Michel foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture (pp. 242–254). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988c). An aesthetics of existence. In L. Kritzman (Ed.), Michel foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture (pp. 47–53). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988d). Practicing criticism. In L. Kritzman (Ed.), Michel foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture (pp. 152–156). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988e). On power. In L. Kritzman (Ed.), Michel foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture (pp. 96–109). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990). The use of pleasure. Translated by R. Hurley. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Questions of method. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 73–86). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1993). About the beginnings of the hermeneutics of the self: Two lectures at dartmouth. Political Theory, 21(2), 198–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1999). Religion and culture. Selected and edited by J. Carrette. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2005). The hermeneutics of the subject. Edited by F. Gros and translated by G. Burchell. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007a). What is critique? In S. Lotringer (Ed.). The politics of truth. With an introduction by J. Rajchman (pp. 41–75). California: Semiotex (e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2007b). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the collège de France 1977–1978. Edited by M. Senellart and translated by G. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Burchell, Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the collège de France 1978–1979 Edited by M. Senellart and translated by G. Burchell. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. (1998). Stories of illness as care of the self: A foucauldian dialogue. Health, 2(3), 329–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, T. (2009). Neoliberalism, governmentality, and ethics. Foucault Studies, 6, 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism; or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2015a). This is not McMindfulness by any stretch of the imagination. The Psychologist. Retrieved from https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/not-mcmindfulness-any-stretch-imagination

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2015b, October 20). Mindfulness has huge potential—but McMindfulness is no panacea. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/20/mindfulness-mental-health-potential-benefits-uk

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. (2012). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milchman, A., & Rosenberg, A. (2007). The aesthetic and ascetic dimensions of an ethics of self-fashioning. Parrhesia, 2, 44–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, E. (2015). The question of faith in a micropolitics of the Neoliberal University. Sites: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies, 12(1), 153–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, E. (2016). Buddhism and cultural studies: A profession of faith. Palgrave Mcmillan: New York, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, E., & Watson, J. (2013). A foucauldian and deleuzian reading of autopoetic bisexual lives. Writing From Below, 1(2), 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, T. (2002). Foucault and the art of ethics. New York, London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksala, J. (2013). Neoliberalism and biopolitical governmentality. In J. Nilsson & S. Wallenstein (Eds.). Foucault, biopolitcs, and governmentality, Södertörn Philosophical Studies 14. StockholmL Södertörn University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., Besley, T., Olssen, M., Maurer, S., & Weber, S. (Eds.). (2009). Governmentality studies in education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsker, J. (2015). Corporations’ newest hack: Meditation hack. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/03/corporations-newest-productivity-hack-meditation/387286/

  • Purser, R., & Loy, D. (2013, July 1). Beyond McMindfulness. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-purser/beyond-mcmindfulness_b_3519289.html

  • Purser, R., & Ng, E. (2015, September 27). Corporate mindfulness is bullsh*t: Zen or no Zen, you’re working harder and being paid less. Salon. Retrieved from http://www.salon.com/2015/09/27/corporate_mindfulness_is_bullsht_zen_or_no_zen_youre_working_harder_and_being_paid_less/

  • Read, J. (2009). A genealogy of homo-economicus: Neoliberalism and the production of subjectivity. Foucault Studies, 6, 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, D. (2002). Negotiating psycho-emotional dimensions of disability and their influence on identity constructions. Disability and Society, 17(5), 493–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1989). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sauter, T. (2014). ‘What’s on your mind?’ Writing on facebook as a tool for self-formation. New Media and Society, 16(5), 823–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulson, M. (2016). Put your money where your mind is: a for profit meditation studio opens in New York. Retrieved from http://religiondispatches.org/put-your-money-where-your-mind-is-a-for-profit-meditation-studio-opens-in-new-york/

  • Schultz, T. (1972). Human capital: Policy issues and research opportunities. Human Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigworth, G., & Gregg, M. (Eds.). (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham, London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smail, D. (2005). Power, interest and psychology: elements of a social materialist understanding of distress. Ross-on-Wyde: PCCS Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, A., Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2009). Critical performativity: The unfinished business of management studies. Human Relations, 62(4), 537–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. (2012). Mindfulness: Towards a critical relational perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(9), 631–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, H. (2016, January 26). Mindfulness: The craze sweeping through schools in now at a university near you. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/jan/26/mindfulness-craze-schools-university-near-you-cambridge

  • Thorpe, H. (2008). Foucault, technologies of self, and the media: Discourses of feminity in snowboarding culture. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 32(2), 199–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2004). Intensities of feelings: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler, 86(1), 57–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (2012). Re-visioning bisexuality: Rhizomatic cartographies of sex, gender and sexuality (unpublished doctoral dissertation). School of Humanities and Social Sciences: Deakin University, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, C. (2010). Stations of self: Aesthetics and ascetic in foucault’s conversion narrative. Foucault Studies, 8, 78–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edwin Ng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ng, E. (2016). The Critique of Mindfulness and the Mindfulness of Critique: Paying Attention to the Politics of Our Selves with Foucault’s Analytic of Governmentality. In: Purser, R., Forbes, D., Burke, A. (eds) Handbook of Mindfulness. Mindfulness in Behavioral Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44019-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics