Skip to main content

Implementation Science: Translating Research into Practice for Sustained Impact

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgical Patient Care

Abstract

Implementation science is playing a crucial role in reducing research-to-policy and research-to-practice gaps with the ultimate intention of advancing human health. Implementation science is particularly relevant to surgical care to better understand, intervene, and prevent adverse effects such as injury or death. Over the past two decades, the political and policy drive to improve the safety and quality of surgical care through evidence-based interventions has flourished. In this chapter, we discuss the role of implementation science in promoting health through the use of evidence-based practices (EBP), particularly as it relates to surgical care. We first provide a general definition and description of implementation science that includes a presentation of frameworks for successful EBP implementation, consideration of organizational context in implementation, and the role of leadership for successful implementation. We then illustrate these concepts through the presentation of surgical checklist implementation. Challenges facing the field of implementation science, and future directions for implementation science, are discussed.

“…translational research refers to translating research into practice; ie, ensuring that new treatments and research knowledge actually reach the patients or populations for whom they are intended and are implemented correctly.”

—Woolf, SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2008; 299(2), 211–213.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Green LAW, Ottoson JM, Garcia C, Hiatt RA. Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:151–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lobb R, Colditz GA. Implementation science and its application to population health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:235–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Balas EA, Boren SA. Managing clinical knowledge for healthcare improvements. In: Bemmel J, McCray AT, editors. Yearbook of medical informatics 2000: patient-centered systems. Stuttgart: Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft; 2000. p. 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Glasgow RE, Strycker LA. Preventive care practices for diabetes management in two primary care samples. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19(1):9–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hogan MF. The President’s New Freedom Commission: recommendations to transform mental health care in America. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54(11):1467–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Institute of Medicine [IOM]. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. National Advisory Mental Health Council. Bridging science and service: a report by the National Advisory Mental Health Council’s clinical treatment and services research workgroup. Bethesda: National Institute of Mental Health; 1999. Contract No.: NIH Publication No. 99-4353.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Proctor EK, Landsverk J, Aarons GA, Chambers D, Glisson C, Mittman B. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009;36(1):24–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS]. Mental health: a report of the surgeon general. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS]; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS]. Report of the surgeon general’s conference on children’s mental health: a national action agenda. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hardisty DJ, Haaga DAF. Diffusion of treatment research: does open access matter? J Clin Psychol. 2008;64(7):821–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. United States General Accounting Office. Improving the flow of information to the congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1995. Contract No.: GAO/PEMD-95-1.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rogers EM. Diffusions of innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gotham HJ. Diffusion of mental health and substance abuse treatments: development, dissemination, and implementation. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2004;11(2):161–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grimshaw J, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, et al. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care. 2001;39(8):II2–II45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kerner J, Rimer B, Emmons K. Introduction to the special section on dissemination: dissemination research and research dissemination: how can we close the gap? Health Psychol. 2005;24(5):443–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stirman SW, Crits-Christoph P, DeRubeis RJ. Achieving successful dissemination of empirically supported psychotherapies: a synthesis of dissemination theory. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2004;11(4):343–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lomas J. Words without action? The production, dissemination, and impact of consensus recommendations. Annu Rev Public Health. 1991;12(1):41–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saul J, Duffy J, Noonan R, Lubell K, Wandersman A, Flaspohler P, et al. Bridging science and practice in violence prevention: addressing ten key challenges. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3-4):197–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Col NF. Challenges in translating research into practice. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005;14(1):87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Weiss CH. The circuitry of enlightenment: diffusion of social science research to policymakers. Knowl Creat Diffus Util. 1987;8(2):274–81.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barach P, Lipshultz S. The benefits and hazards of publicly reported quality outcomes. Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2016;42:45–9. doi:10.1016/j.ppedcard.2016.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Emshoff J, Blakely CH, Gray D, Jakes S, Brounstein P, Coulter J, et al. An ESID case study at the federal level. Am J Community Psychol. 2003;32(3).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. Implement Sci. 2006;1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  26. NIH. Dissemination and implementation research in health (R01 Program Announcement). 2006. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-06-039.html.

  27. Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3):337–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ferlie EB, Shortell SM. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):281–315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Glisson C, Schoenwald S. The ARC organizational and community intervention strategy for implementing evidence-based children’s mental health treatments. Ment Health Serv Res. 2005;7(4):243–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jeffery R, Iserman E, Haynes RB. Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve diabetes management? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2013;30(6):739–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Klein KJ, Sorra JS. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad Manage Rev. 1996;21(4):1055–80.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, the National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231); 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Powell BJ, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, Carpenter CR, Griffey RT, Bunger AC, et al. A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Med Care Res Rev. 2012;69:123–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Aarons GA, Hurlburt M, Horwitz SM. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(1):4–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Proctor EK, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons GA, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38(2):65–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lilford R, Chilton PJ, Hemming K, Brown C, Girling A, Barach P. Evaluating policy and service interventions: framework to guide selection and interpretation of study end points. BMJ. 2010;341:c4413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Saldana L, Chamberlain P, Bradford WD, Campbell M, Landsverk J. The cost of implementing new strategies (COINS): a method for mapping implementation resources using the stages of implementation completion. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2014;39:177–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Hesselink G, Zegers M, Vernooij-Dassen M, Barach P, Kalkman C, Flink M, Öhlen G, Olsson M, Bergenbrant S, Orrego C, Suñol R, Toccafondi G, Venneri F, Dudzik-Urbaniak E, Kutryba B, Schoonhoven L, Wollersheim H, European HANDOVER Research Collaborative. Improving patient discharge and reducing hospital readmissions by using Intervention Mapping. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:389. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-389.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Backer TE, David SL. Synthesis of behavioral science learnings about technology transfer. In: Backer TE, David SL, Soucy D, editors. Reviewing the behavioral science knowledge base on technology transfer. NIDA Research Monograph 155. Rockville, MD: Natl. Inst. on Drug Abuse; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Klein KJ, Conn AB, Sorra JS. Implementing computerized technology: an organizational analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(5):811–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jacobs JA, Dodson EA, Baker EA, Deshpande AD, Brownson RC. Barriers to evidence-based decision making in public health: a national survey of chronic disease practitioners. Public Health Rep. 2010;125(5):736–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Hesselink G, Vernooij-Dassen M, Pijnenborg L, Barach P, Gademan P, Dudzik-Urbaniak E, Flink M, Orrego C, Toccafondi G, Johnson JK, Schoonhoven L, Wollersheim H. Organizational culture: an important context for addressing and improving hospital to community patient discharge. Med Care. 2012. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827632ec.

  47. Aarons GA, Ehrhart MG, Farahnak LR, Sklar M. Aligning leadership across systems and organizations to develop a strategic climate for evidence-based practice implementation. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:255–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Mohr J, Abelson H, Barach P. Leadership strategies in patient safety. J Qual Manage Health Care. 2003;11(1):69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Aarons GA, Ehrhart MG, Farahnak LR. The Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS): development of a brief measure of unit level implementation leadership. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Ehrhart MG, Aarons GA, Farahnak LR. Assessing the organizational context for EBP implementation: the development and validity testing of the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS). Implement Sci. 2014;9:157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Jacobs SR, Weiner BJ, Bunger AC. Context matters: measuring implementation climate among individuals and groups. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Helfrich C, Li Y, Sharp N, Sales A. Organizational readiness to change assessment (ORCA): development of an instrument based on the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (PARIHS) framework. Implement Sci. 2009;4:38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Bognar A, Barach P, Johnson J, Duncan R, Woods D, Holl J, Birnbach D, Bacha E. Errors and the burden of errors: attitudes, perceptions and the culture of safety in pediatric cardiac surgical teams. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;4:1374–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP. Disrupted routines: team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Adm Sci Q. 2001;46(4):685–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Edmondson AC. Speaking up in the operating room: how team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J Manage Stud. 2003;40(6):1419–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Aarons GA, Ehrhart MG, Farahnak LR, Hurlburt MS. Leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI): a randomized mixed method pilot study of a leadership and organization development intervention for evidence-based practice implementation. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Barach P, Cosman P. Teams, team training, and the role of simulation. In: Barach P, Jacobs J, Laussen P, Lipshultz S, editors. Outcomes analysis, quality improvement, and patient safety for pediatric and congenital cardiac disease. New York: Springer Books; 2014. ISBN 978-1-4471-4618-6.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bass BM, Avolio BJ. The implications of transformational and transactional leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. In: Pasmore W, Woodman RW, editors. Research in organizational change and development. Greenwich: JAI Press; 1990. p. 231–72.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Bommer WH. Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. J Manage. 1996;22(2):259–98.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Walumbwa FO, Orwa B, Wang P, Lawler JJ. Transformational leadership, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction: a comparative study of Kenyan and U.S. financial firms. Hum Resour Dev Q. 2005;16(2):235–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Bycio P, Hackett RD, Allen JS. Further assessments of Bass’s (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. J Appl Psychol. 1995;80(4):468–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Hater JJ, Bass BM. Superiors’ evaluations and subordinates’ perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. J Appl Psychol. 1988;73(4):695–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Waldman DA, Bass BM, Einstein WO. Leadership and outcomes of performance appraisal processes. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2011;60(3):177–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Bass BM, Avolio BJ, Jung DI, Berson Y. Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(2):207–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Howell JM, Avolio BJ. Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78(6):891–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Zohar D. Modifying supervisory practices to improve subunit safety: a leadership-based intervention model. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(1):156–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Aarons GA, Sommerfeld DH, Willging CE. The soft underbelly of system change: the role of leadership and organizational climate in turnover during statewide behavioral health reform. Psychol Serv. 2011;8(4):269–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  69. Michaelis B, Stegmaier R, Sonntag K. Affective commitment to change and innovation implementation behavior: the role of charismatic leadership and employees’ trust in top management. J Change Manage. 2009;9(4):399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Michaelis B, Stegmaier R, Sonntag K. Shedding light on followers’ innovation implementation behavior: the role of transformational leadership, commitment to change, and climate for initiative. J Manage Psychol. 2010;25(4):408–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Cannella A, Monroe M. Contrasting perspectives on strategic leaders: toward a more realistic view of top managers. J Manage. 1997;23(3):213–37.

    Google Scholar 

  72. O’Reilly CA, Caldwell DF, Chatman JA, Lapiz M, Self W. How leadership matters: the effects of leaders’ alignment on strategy implementation. Leadersh Q. 2010;21(1):104–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Rotemberg JJ, Saloner G. Leadership style and incentives. Manage Sci. 1993;39(11):1299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Winlaw D, Large M, Jacobs J, Barach P. Leadership, surgeon well-being and other non-technical aspects of pediatric cardiac surgery. In: Barach P, Jacobs J, Laussen P, Lipshultz S, editors. Outcomes analysis, quality improvement, and patient safety for pediatric and congenital cardiac disease. New York: Springer Books; 2014. ISBN 978-1-4471-4618-6.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Stamatakis KA, Vinson CA, Kerner JF. Dissemination and implementation research in community and public health settings. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and Implementation research in health: translating science to practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Veterans Health Administration. Uniform mental health services in VA Medical Centers and Clinics (VHA handbook 1160.01). Washington, DC: 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Burke WW. Organization change: theory and practice. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Essock SM, Goldman HH, Van Tosh L, Anthony WA, Appell CR, Bond GR, et al. Evidence-based practices: setting the context and responding to concerns. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2003;26(4):919–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. National Institute of Mental Health [NIMH]. Translating behavioral science into action: report of the national advisory mental health council behavioral science workgroup. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  80. National Institute of Mental Health [NIMH]. What do we know about implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs) and where can we go from here? Baltimore: National Institute of Mental Health; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Newhouse RP, Dearholt SL, Poe SS, Pugh LC, White KM. John Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice model and guidelines. Indianapolis: Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Chreim S, Williams BB, Coller KE. Radical change in healthcare organization: mapping transition between templates, enabling factors, and implementation processes. J Health Organ Manage. 2012;26(2):215–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. McNulty T, Ferlie E. Process transformation: limitations to radical organizational change within public service organizations. Organ Stud. 2004;25(8):1389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Waring J, Currie G. Managing expert knowledge: organizational challenges and managerial futures for the UK medical profession. Organ Stud. 2009;30(7):755–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Priestland A, Hanig R. Developing first-level leaders. Harv Bus Rev. 2005;83(6):112–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Hunt JG. Leadership: a new synthesis. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Wooldridge B, Floyd SW. The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance. Strategic Manage J. 1990;11(3):231–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Stagner R. Corporate decision making: an empirical study. J Appl Psychol. 1969;53(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Pannick S, Sevdalis N, Athanasiou T. Beyond clinical engagement: a pragmatic model for quality improvement interventions, aligning clinical and managerial priorities. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Codman EA. A study in hospital efficiency: as demonstrated by the case report of the first five years of a private hospital. Boston: Thomas Todd; 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson ME. To err is human. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. 2001;322:517–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Lehmann M, Monte K, Barach P, Kindler C. Postoperative patient complaints as a maker for patient safety. J Clin Anesth. 2010;22(1):13–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2008;17:216–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Vincent C. Patient safety. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  96. Cassin B, Barach P. Making sense of root cause analysis investigations of surgery-related adverse events. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92:101–15. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2011.12.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. World Alliance for Patient Safety. WHO surgical safety checklist and implementation manual. World Health Organization. 2008. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/ss_checklist/en/.

  98. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AS, Dellinger E, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:491–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. National Patient Safety Agency. WHO surgical safety checklist: national reporting and learning service. 2009. www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk.

  100. Institute for Innovation and Improvement. National Health Service. http://www.institute.nhs.uk/.

  101. National Health Service. Patient safety. http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/.

  102. Haugen AS, Søfteland E, Almeland SK, Sevdalis N, Vonen B, Eide GE, et al. Effect of the World Health Organization checklist on patient outcomes: a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2015;261(5):821–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Mayer EK, Sevdalis N, Rout S, Caris J, Russ S, Mansell J, et al. Surgical checklist implementation project: the impact of variable WHO checklist compliance on risk-adjusted clinical outcomes after national implementation: a longitudinal study. Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):58–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Molina G, Jiang W, Edmondson L, Gibbons L, Huang LC, Kiang MV, et al. Implementation of the surgical safety checklist in South Carolina hospitals is associated with improvement in perceived perioperative safety. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(5):725–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Haugen AS, Søfteland E, Eide GE, Sevdalis N, Vincent C, Nortvedt MW, et al. Impact of the World Health Organization’s surgical safety checklist on safety culture in the operating theatre: a controlled intervention study. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(5):807–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Urbach DR, Govindarajan A, Saskin R, Wilton AS, Baxter NN. Introduction of surgical safety checklists in Ontario, Canada. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1029–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Leape LL. The checklist conundrum. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(11):1063–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Amalberti R, Auroy Y. Berwick, DM, Barach. P. Five system barriers to achieving ultra-safe health care. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(9):756–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Sanchez J, Barach P. High reliability organizations and surgical microsystems: re-engineering surgical care. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92(1):1–14. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2011.12.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Vats A, Vincent C, Nagpal K, Davies RW, Darzi A, Moorthy K. Practical challenges of introducing WHO surgical checklist: UK pilot experience. BMJ. 2010;340:b5433.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Russ S, Rout S, Caris J, Mansell J, Davies R, Mayer EK, et al. Measuring variation in use of the WHO surgical safety checklist in the operating room: a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(1):1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Schraagen JM, Schouten T, Smit M, Haas F, van der Beek D, van de Ven J, Barach P. A prospective study of paediatric cardiac surgical microsystems: assessing the relationships between non-routine events, teamwork and patient outcomes. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(7):599–603. doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.048983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Bosk CL, Dixon-Woods M, Goeschel CA, Pronovost PJ. Reality check for checklists. Lancet. 2009;374(9688):444–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Schraagen JM, Schouten A, Smit M, van der Beek D, van de Ven J, Barach P. Improving methods for studying teamwork in cardiac surgery. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:1–6. doi:10.1136/qshc.2009.040105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Catchpole K, Russ S. The problem with checklists. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016: in press.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Barach P. Addressing barriers for change in clinical practice. In: Guidet B, Valentin A, Flaatten H, editors. Quality management in intensive care: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. ISBN 978-1-107-50386-1.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Kapur N, Parand A, Soukup T, Reader T, Sevdalis N. Aviation and healthcare: a comparative review with implications for patient safety. JRSM Open. 2016;7(1):2054270415616548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Russ SJ, Sevdalis N, Moorthy K, Mayer EK, Rout S, Caris J, et al. A qualitative evaluation of the barriers and facilitators toward implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist across hospitals in England: lessons from the “Surgical Checklist Implementation Project”. Ann Surg. 2015;261(1):81–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Fogarty International Center. Frequently asked questions about implementation science. May 2013. http://www.fic.nih.gov/News/Events/implementation-science/Pages/faqs.aspx.

  120. Landsverk J, Brown CH, Chamberlain P, Palinkas L, Ogihara M, Czaja S, et al. Design and analysis in dissemination and implementation research. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, editors. Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Brown CH, Kellam SG, Kaupert S, Muthen B, Wang W, Muthen LK, et al. Partnerships for the design, conduct, and analysis of effectiveness, and implementation research: experiences of the prevention science and methodology group. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012;39(4):301–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Brown CH, Mason WA, Brown EC. Translating the intervention approach into an appropriate research design: the next-generation adaptive designs for effectiveness and implementation research. In: Sloboda Z, Petras H, editors. Defining prevention science. New York, NY: Springer US; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Brown CH, Chamberlain P, Saldana L, Wang W, Cruden G. Evaluation of two implementation strategies in fifty-one counties in two states: results of a cluster randomized implementation trial. Implement Sci. 2014;9:134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Saldana L. The stages of implementation completion for evidence-based practice: protocol for a mixed methods study. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Jones L, Wells K. Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research. JAMA. 2007;297(4):407–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Kilo CM. A framework for collaborative improvement: lessons from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s Breakthrough Series. Qual Manag Health Care. 1998;6(4):1–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Green CA, Duan N, Gibbons RD, Hoagwood K, Palinkas L, Wisdom J. Approaches to mixed methods dissemination and implementation research: methods, strengths, caveats, and opportunities. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42(5):508–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C. National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(7):1274–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8:139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder L, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Powell BJ, Beidas RS, Lewis CC, Aarons G, McMillen JC, Proctor E, et al. Methods to improve the selection and tailoring of implementation strategies. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2015;1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Matthieu MM, Damschroder L, Chinman M, Smith JL, et al. Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study. Implement Sci. 2015;10:109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Shortell SM, O’Brien JL, Carman JM, Foster RW, Hughes EF, Boerstler H, et al. Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement/total quality management: concept versus implementation. Health Serv Res. 1995;30(2):377–401.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Weiner BJ, Alexander JA, Shortell SM, Baker LC, Becker MA, Geppert JJ. Quality improvement implementation and hospital performance on quality indicators. Health Serv Res. 2006;41(2):307–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Ovretveit J. Evaluating improvement and implementation for health. McGraw-Hill Education: Maidenhead; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Global Implementation Initiative. http://globalimplementation.org/about/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Preparation of this chapter was supported by United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01MH072961 and R01DA038466 (PI: Aarons) and F32HS024192 (PI: Sklar). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIMH.

Dr. Sevdalis’ research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London at King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. NS is a member of King’s Improvement Science, which is part of the NIHR CLAHRC South London and comprises a specialist team of improvement scientists and senior researchers based at King’s College London. Its work is funded by King’s Health Partners (Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, King’s College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust), Guy’s and St Thomas’ Charity, the Maudsley Charity and the Health Foundation. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Disclosure Statement: The authors are not aware of any affiliations, memberships, funding, or financial holdings that might be perceived as affecting the objectivity of this review. Sevdalis is the Director of London Safety & Training Solutions Ltd, which provides consultancy and advisory services on patient safety, quality improvement, and training to hospitals internationally.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory A. Aarons PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aarons, G.A., Sklar, M., Sevdalis, N. (2017). Implementation Science: Translating Research into Practice for Sustained Impact. In: Sanchez, J., Barach, P., Johnson, J., Jacobs, J. (eds) Surgical Patient Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44010-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44010-1_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44008-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44010-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics