Advertisement

Counting the homeless in Europe: ‘compare before harmonising’

  • Cécile BrousseEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning book series (LARI, volume 13)

Abstract

After having outlined the debates around the definition of homelessness and the issues concealed by terminological problems, we will describe the two major clashes that emerged as this plan for an indicator was being put in place. The first was the opposition between the public and charitable sectors, the second that between the various EU member states. The most evident of these clashes was the first one, since it was embedded in institutions and expressed publicly. The second, which involved the member states, was less visible, particularly in this initial phase of the statistical exercise, in which national governments as such were not represented. Thus, the harmonisation process (reaching a consensus) was carried out within a supposedly ‘denationalised’ space by actors committed to this principle.

Keywords

Housing Market Homeless People Homeless Population Charitable Organisation National Statistical Institute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brousse, C. (2004). The Production of Data on Homelessness and Housing Deprivation in the European Union : Survey and Proposals, Eurostat Working Paper, Theme 3: Population and social conditions.Google Scholar
  2. Cabrera Cabrera, P.J. (2000). La acción social con personas sin hogar en España. Madrid : Cáritas Española and Universidad Pontificia Comillas.Google Scholar
  3. CIES (2000). Rapporto annuale sulle politiche contro la povertà e l’esclusione sociale. Roma : Commissione di indagine sull’esclusione sociale, Dipartimento per gli Affari sociali, Presidenza del Consiglio.Google Scholar
  4. Dezalay, Y. (1993) Multinationales de l’expertise et “dépérissement de l’État”, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 96-97, 3-20.Google Scholar
  5. Desrosières, A. (1991). Remarques à propos du livre : ‘Deux siècles de travail en France’ », Séries longues et conventions d’équivalence, Courrier des statistiques, 57, 56-58.Google Scholar
  6. Desrosières, A. (2000). L’État, le marché et les statistiques : cinq façons d’agir sur l’économie, Courrier des statistiques, 95-96, 3-10.Google Scholar
  7. Desrosières, A. (2002). Comment fabriquer un espace de commune mesure : harmonisation des statistiques et réalismes de leurs usages. In M. Lallement & J. Spurk (Eds). Stratégies des comparaisons internationales (pp. 151-166). Paris : CNRS.Google Scholar
  8. Desrosières, A. (2003). Les qualités des quantités, Courrier des statistiques, 105-106, 51-63.Google Scholar
  9. Desrosières, A. (2004). Enquêtes versus registres administratifs : réflexions sur la dualité des sources statistiques, Courrier des statistiques, 111, 3-16.Google Scholar
  10. Desrosières, A., & Blanc, M. (2002). Entre décentralisation et coordination : une analyse des spécificités des SSM. Courrier des statistiques, 104, 9-25.Google Scholar
  11. HIP (2002). Housing report. London: Housing Investment Programme.Google Scholar
  12. Laird, A., Mulholland, S., Campbell-Jack, D. (2002). Rough sleepers initiative – monitoring the target of ending the need to sleep rough by 2003 – second report, 2001-2002.Google Scholar
  13. NBHW (2001). Social report. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.Google Scholar
  14. ONPES (2002). Le rapport de l’Observatoire national de la pauvreté et de l’exclusion sociale, 2001-2002. Paris : La Documentation française.Google Scholar
  15. Perdaens, A., & Roesems, T. (2002). 8e rapport sur l’état de la pauvreté en Région de Bruxelles-Capitale. Brussels : Observatoire de la Santé et du Social, Commission communautaire commune de Bruxelles-Capitale.Google Scholar
  16. Pleace, N., Burrows, R., Quilgars, D. (1997). Homelessness in Contemporary Britain : Conceptualisation and Measurement. In N. Pleace, R. Burrows, D. Quilgars (Eds), Homelessness and social policy (pp. 1-17). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Rea, A., Schmitz, P., Mondelaers, N., Giannoni, D. (2001). La problématique des personnes sans-abri en Région de Bruxelles-Capitale. Rapport final. Brussels : ULB/ Institut de Sociologie/GERME.Google Scholar
  18. The Housing Fund of Finland (2002). Selvityksiä. Report, Helsinki: Valtion asuntorahasto (ARA).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DARESParisFrance

Personalised recommendations