Skip to main content

Counting the homeless in Europe: ‘compare before harmonising’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 508 Accesses

Part of the book series: Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning ((LARI,volume 13))

Abstract

After having outlined the debates around the definition of homelessness and the issues concealed by terminological problems, we will describe the two major clashes that emerged as this plan for an indicator was being put in place. The first was the opposition between the public and charitable sectors, the second that between the various EU member states. The most evident of these clashes was the first one, since it was embedded in institutions and expressed publicly. The second, which involved the member states, was less visible, particularly in this initial phase of the statistical exercise, in which national governments as such were not represented. Thus, the harmonisation process (reaching a consensus) was carried out within a supposedly ‘denationalised’ space by actors committed to this principle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brousse, C. (2004). The Production of Data on Homelessness and Housing Deprivation in the European Union : Survey and Proposals, Eurostat Working Paper, Theme 3: Population and social conditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera Cabrera, P.J. (2000). La acción social con personas sin hogar en España. Madrid : Cáritas Española and Universidad Pontificia Comillas.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIES (2000). Rapporto annuale sulle politiche contro la povertà e l’esclusione sociale. Roma : Commissione di indagine sull’esclusione sociale, Dipartimento per gli Affari sociali, Presidenza del Consiglio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dezalay, Y. (1993) Multinationales de l’expertise et “dépérissement de l’État”, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 96-97, 3-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, A. (1991). Remarques à propos du livre : ‘Deux siècles de travail en France’ », Séries longues et conventions d’équivalence, Courrier des statistiques, 57, 56-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, A. (2000). L’État, le marché et les statistiques : cinq façons d’agir sur l’économie, Courrier des statistiques, 95-96, 3-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, A. (2002). Comment fabriquer un espace de commune mesure : harmonisation des statistiques et réalismes de leurs usages. In M. Lallement & J. Spurk (Eds). Stratégies des comparaisons internationales (pp. 151-166). Paris : CNRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, A. (2003). Les qualités des quantités, Courrier des statistiques, 105-106, 51-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, A. (2004). Enquêtes versus registres administratifs : réflexions sur la dualité des sources statistiques, Courrier des statistiques, 111, 3-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, A., & Blanc, M. (2002). Entre décentralisation et coordination : une analyse des spécificités des SSM. Courrier des statistiques, 104, 9-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • HIP (2002). Housing report. London: Housing Investment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, A., Mulholland, S., Campbell-Jack, D. (2002). Rough sleepers initiative – monitoring the target of ending the need to sleep rough by 2003 – second report, 2001-2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • NBHW (2001). Social report. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • ONPES (2002). Le rapport de l’Observatoire national de la pauvreté et de l’exclusion sociale, 2001-2002. Paris : La Documentation française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perdaens, A., & Roesems, T. (2002). 8e rapport sur l’état de la pauvreté en Région de Bruxelles-Capitale. Brussels : Observatoire de la Santé et du Social, Commission communautaire commune de Bruxelles-Capitale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleace, N., Burrows, R., Quilgars, D. (1997). Homelessness in Contemporary Britain : Conceptualisation and Measurement. In N. Pleace, R. Burrows, D. Quilgars (Eds), Homelessness and social policy (pp. 1-17). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rea, A., Schmitz, P., Mondelaers, N., Giannoni, D. (2001). La problématique des personnes sans-abri en Région de Bruxelles-Capitale. Rapport final. Brussels : ULB/ Institut de Sociologie/GERME.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Housing Fund of Finland (2002). Selvityksiä. Report, Helsinki: Valtion asuntorahasto (ARA).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cécile Brousse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brousse, C. (2016). Counting the homeless in Europe: ‘compare before harmonising’. In: Bruno, I., Jany-Catrice, F., Touchelay, B. (eds) The Social Sciences of Quantification. Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44000-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics