Advertisement

Alain Desrosières’s reflexive numbers

  • Luc BoltanskiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning book series (LARI, volume 13)

Abstract

I am not going to offer a technical analysis of one or other of his published works, which others represented in the present volume will do much better than I can, particularly in respect of his contribution to statistics and the history of statistics and their uses. However, I would like to say, in a few words, what in my view was the meaning of his work, what made it of crucial importance to sociology and the social sciences in general. To do this, I will try to place his work in the context of its time, a long period of more than 40 years, from the end of the 1960s to the 2000s. And to place Desrosière’s work in the context of its time is to connect it with both the intellectual and political debates of that time and their evolution.

Keywords

Social Science Social Class Social World Social Reality Social Critique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amossé, T. (2013). La nomenclature socio-professionnelle : une histoire revisitée. Annales, 68 (4), 1039-1075.Google Scholar
  2. Boltanski, L. (2011). On critique. A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge : Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bruno, I., & Didier, E. (2013). Benchmarking : l’Etat sous pression statistique. Paris : La Découverte.Google Scholar
  4. Bruno, I., Didier, E., & Prévieux, J. (2014). Statactivisme. Comment lutter avec des nombres. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  5. Desrosières, A. (1998). The Politics of Large Numbers. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dosse, F. (1995). L’empire du sens. L’humanisation des sciences humaines. Paris : La Découverte.Google Scholar
  7. Janicaud, D. (1992). Le tournant théologique de la phénoménologie française. Paris : Editions de l’Eclat.Google Scholar
  8. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  9. Winch, P. (1958). The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EHESSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations