Skip to main content

A Maturity Model for Information Governance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (TPDL 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9819))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Information Governance (IG) as defined by Gartner is the “specification of decision rights and an accountability framework to encourage desirable behavior in the valuation, creation, storage, use, archival and deletion of information. Includes the processes, roles, standards and metrics that ensure the effective and efficient use of information in enabling an organization to achieve its goals”.

Organizations that wish to comply with IG best practices, can seek support on the existing best practices, standards and other relevant references not only in the core domain but also in relevant peripheral domains. Thus, despite the existence of these references, organizations still are unable, in many scenarios, to determine in a straightforward manner two fundamental business-related concerns: (1) to which extent do their current processes comply with such standards; and, if not, (2) which goals do they need to achieve in order to be compliant.

In this paper, we present how to create an IG maturity model based on existing reference documents. The process is based on existing maturity model development methods that allow for a systematic approach to maturity model development backed up by a well-known and proved scientific research method called Design Science Research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shang, S., Lin. S.: Understanding the effectiveness of capability maturity model integration by examining the knowledge management of software development process. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excellence 20(5), 509–521 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. CMMI Product Team, CMMI for services, version 1.3. Software Engineering Institute. Carnegie Mellon University, Technical report CMU/SEI-2010-TR-034 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tonini, A., Carvalho, M., Spínola, M.: Contribuição dos modelos de qualidade e maturidade na melhoria dos processos de software. Produção 18(2), 275–286 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paulk, M., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M., Weber, C.: Capability Maturity Model for software, Version 1.1 CMU/SEI-93-TR-24, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, Carnegie Melon University (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, E., Jessen, S.: Project maturity in organizations. Int. J. Proj. Manag. Account. 21, 457–461 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fitterer, R., Rohner, P.: Towards assessing the networkability of health care providers: a maturity model approach. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manag. 8, 309–333 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sen, A., Ramamurthy, K., Sinha, A.P.: A model of data warehousing process maturity. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 38(2), 336–353 (2012). doi:10.1109/TSE.2011.2. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsptp=&arnumber=5680911&isnumber=6173074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mettler, T.: A Design Science Research Perspective on Maturity Models in Information Systems. Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Amaral, A., Araújo, M.: The organizational maturity as a conductive field for germinating business sustainability. In: Proceedings of Business Sustainability I Conference, Póvoa do Varzim, Portugal (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cooke-Davies, T., Arzymanowc, A.: The maturity of project management in different industries: an investigation into variations between project management models. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 21(6), 471–478 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hillson, D.: Maturity - good or bad? Project Manager Today, p. 14 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Röglinger, M., Pöppelbuß, J.: What makes a useful maturity model? A framework for general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. In: Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland, June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brookes, N., Clark, R.: Using maturity models to improve project management practice. In: Proceedings of the POMS 20th Annual Conference, Florida, USA, 1–4 May 2009

    Google Scholar 

  14. Demir, C., Kocabaş, I.: Project management maturity model (PMMM) in educational organizations. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 9, 1641–1645 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. OPM3: Organizational Project Management Maturity Model. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hersey-Miller, L.: Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3). Office of Major Projects, Quarter 3, pp. 1–8, September 2005

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kohlegger, M., Maier, R., Thalmann, S.: Understanding maturity models: results of a structured content analysis. In: Proceedings of the I-KNOW 2009 and I-SEMANTICS 2009, Graz, Austria, 2–4 September 2009

    Google Scholar 

  18. Korbel, A., Benedict, R.: Application of the project management maturity model to drive organisational improvement in a state owned corporation. In: Proceedings of 2007 AIPM Conference, Tasmania, Australia, 7–10 October 2007

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jia, G., Chen, Y., Xue, X., Chen, J., Cao, J., Tang, K.: Program management organization maturity integrated model for mega construction programs in China. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 29, 834–845 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Koshgoftar, M., Osman, O.: Comparison between maturity models. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, vol. 5, pp. 297–301 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prado, D.: Gerenciamento de Programas e Projetos nas Organizações. Minas Gerais: Nova Lima (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jamaluddin, R., Chin, C., Lee, C.: Understanding the requirements for project management maturity models: awareness of the ICT industry in Malaysia. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE IEEM, pp. 1573–1577 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tarantino, A.: Governance, Risk and Compliance Handbook. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. IT Governance Institute, IT Control Objectives for BASEL II – The Importance of Governance and Risk Management for Compliance (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lei, T., Ligtvoet, A., Volker, L., Herder, P.: Evaluating asset management maturity in the netherlands: a compact benchmark of eight different asset management organizations. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Engineering Asset Management (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Real Story Group, DAM Foundation: The DAM Maturity Model. http://dammaturitymodel.org/

  27. ARMA International: Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles - Information Governance Maturity Model. http://www.arma.org/principles

  28. Röglinger, M., Pöppelbuß, J., Becker, J.: Maturity models in business process management. Bus. Process Manag. J. 18(2), 328–346 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., Pöppelbuß, J.: Developing maturity models for IT management – a procedure model and its application. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 1(3), 212–222 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. ISO 9001:2008: Quality management systems – Requirements (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was co-funded by FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, under project PEst-OE/EEI/LA0021/2013 and by the European Commission under the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme 2007-2013, E-ARK – Grant Agreement no. 620998 under the Policy Support Programme. The authors are solely responsible for the content of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diogo Proença .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Proença, D., Vieira, R., Borbinha, J. (2016). A Maturity Model for Information Governance. In: Fuhr, N., Kovács, L., Risse, T., Nejdl, W. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. TPDL 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9819. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43997-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43997-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43996-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43997-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics