Mega-Events and New Patterns of Cooperation: The European Capitals of Culture

Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)


Since its launch 30 years ago, the European Capital of Culture (ECOC) programme has been researched widely from different perspectives of urban and regional development, investigating the physical and structural changes that it initiates and the challenges that it brings to local government and to urban governance. Alternatively, this chapter gives a longitudinal analysis of two particular ECOC cases to examine the potentials of this cultural mega-event for social (network) capital mobilisation. Inter-organisational networks of an ECOC project can be characterised as collaborative networks; however, considering their potential longer-term sustained impact, they can contribute to strengthening the local–regional governance network. Using examples of the cities of Pécs, in Hungary, and Turku, in Finland, the analysis looks into the networks and relations between various participating actors in order to explore how these ECOC projects facilitate and change inter-organisational cooperation and networking among cultural and creative producers. The study applies the basic approach and methodology of social network analysis and uses primary data taken from online surveys performed in the two ECOC cities. Primarily, the chapter uses an analytical approach based on the thorough examination of numerical and visualised data. The findings reveal the importance of knowledge and support networks in the field of creative industries and the role of large-scale cultural events in the formation and sustainability of such networks.


European capitals of culture Local government Urban governance Mega-events Collaborative networks Local–regional development Social network analysis Hungary Finland 


  1. Ansell C (2000) The networked polity: regional development in Western Europe. Governance 13(2):279–291. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauböck R (1996) Social and cultural integration in a civil society. In: Bauböck R, Heller A, Zolberg AR (eds) The challenge of diversity: integration and pluralism in societies of immigration. Aldershot, Avebury, pp 67–132Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu P (1983/1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson J (ed) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood, New York, p 241–258Google Scholar
  4. Bulkeley H (2005) Reconfiguring environmental governance: towards a politics of scales and networks. Polit Geogr 24(8):875–902. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Comunian R (2011a) Rethinking the creative city: the role of complexity, networks and interactions in the urban creative economy. Urban Stud 48(6):1157–1179. doi: 10.1177/0042098010370626 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Comunian R (2011b) Social network analysis. Reg Insights 2(2):3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cropper S, Ebers M, Huxham C, Ring PS (eds) (2008) The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Edizel Ö (2014) Mega-events as a catalyst for place-marketing: exploring Izmir EXPO 2015 candidacy and Istanbul ECoC 2010. Reg Mag 295(1):14–15. doi: 10.1080/13673882.2014.11006052 Google Scholar
  9. Evans GL (2011) Cities of culture and the regeneration game. J Tour Sport Creat Ind 6:5–18Google Scholar
  10. Getz D, Andersson T, Larson M (2007) Festival stakeholder roles: concepts and case studies. Event Manag 10(2):103–122. doi: 10.3727/152599507780676689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gomes P, Librero-Cano A (2014) Evaluating 3 decades of the European Capital of Culture programme: a difference-in-differences approach. Accessed 7 Oct 2015
  12. Hall CM (2006) Urban entrepreneurship, corporate interests and sports mega-events: the thin policies of competitiveness within the hard outcomes of neoliberalism. Sociol Rev 54(s2):59–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00653.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison J (2013) Configuring the new ‘regional world’: on being caught between territory and networks. Reg Stud 47(1):55–74. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.644239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrero LC, Sanz JA, Devesa M (2006) The economic impact of cultural events: a case-study of Salamanca 2002, European Capital of Culture. Eur Urban Reg Stud 13(1):41–57. doi: 10.1177/0969776406058946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hirschi C (2010) Strengthening regional cohesion: collaborative networks and sustainable development in Swiss rural areas. Ecol Soc 15(4):16Google Scholar
  16. Isett KR, Mergel IA, LeRoux K, Mischen PA, Rethemeyer RK (2011) Networks in public administration scholarship: understanding where we are and where we need to go. J Public Adm Res Theory 21(suppl 1):i157–i173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kilduff M, Tsai W (2003) Social networks and organizations. Sage, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krätke S (2010) Regional knowledge networks: a network analysis approach to the interlinking of knowledge resources. Eur Urban Reg Stud 17(1):83–97. doi: 10.1177/0969776409350794 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mills BM, Rosentraub MS (2013) Hosting mega-events: a guide to the evaluation of development effects in integrated metropolitan regions. Tour Manag 34:238–246. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Misener L, Mason DS (2007) Creating community networks: can sporting events offer meaningful sources of social capital? Manag Leis 11(1):39–56. doi: 10.1080/13606710500445676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morellato M, Williams PW (2014) Network stakeholder management as an antecedent to effective mega-event legacies development. Paper presented at the TTRA 2014 international conference: tourism and the new global economy, Brugge, Belgium. Accessed 18–20 June 2014
  22. Müller-Seitz G (2012) Leadership in interorganizational networks: a literature review and suggestions for future research. Int J Manag Rev 14(4):428–443. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00324.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Németh Á (2015) European capitals of culture—digging deeper into the governance of the mega-event. Territ Polit Gov. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2014.992804 Google Scholar
  24. Németh Á (2010) Mega-events, their sustainability and potential impact on spatial development: the European Capital of Culture. Int J Interdiscip Soc Sci 5(4):265–278Google Scholar
  25. Newman LL, Dale A (2005). Network structure, diversity, and proactive resilience building: a response to Tompkins and Adger. Ecol Soc 10(1):r2.
  26. O’Brien D, Gardiner S (2006). Creating sustainable mega event impacts: Networking and relationship development through pre-event training. Sport Manag Rev 9(1):25–47. doi: 10.1016/S1441-3523(06)70018-3
  27. Palmer/Rae Associates (2004) European Cities and Capitals of Culture: Part I. Study Prepared for the European Commission. Palmer-Rae Associates, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  28. Powell WW (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res Organ Behav 12:295–336Google Scholar
  29. Provan KG, Milward HB (2001) Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Adm Rev 61(4):414–423. doi: 10.1111/0033-3352.00045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Putnam R (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Richards G (2015) Evaluating the European capital of culture that never was: the case of BrabantStad 2018. J Policy Res Tour Leis Events 7(2):118–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richards G, Wilson J (2004) The impact of cultural events on city image: Rotterdam, cultural capital of Europe 2001. Urban Stud 41(10):1931–1951. doi: 10.1080/0042098042000256323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steiner L, Frey B, Hotz S (2015) European capitals of culture and life satisfaction. Urban Stud 52(2):374–394. doi: 10.1177/0042098014524609 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Woolcock M (2001) The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Can J Policy Res 2(1):11–17Google Scholar
  35. Ziakas V, Costa CA (2010) Explicating inter-organizational linkages of a host community’s events network. Int J Event Festiv Manag 1(2):132–147. doi: 10.1108/17852951011056919 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Karelian InstituteUniversity of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland

Personalised recommendations