Advertisement

Urban Dimension of the European Policies and the New EU Urban Agenda in Croatia

Chapter
  • 777 Downloads
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

The role of sub-national levels of government has significantly changed under the influence of Europeanization and so too the institutional frameworks of urban governance. Local units are expanding their activities to the European political arena, and their influence in strengthening local development is growing. Also, public management reforms are emphasizing the economic role of local government units and their active participation in stimulation of local development. The chapter addresses two main research questions: (1) What are the EU and Council of Europe recommendations for good local governance? and (2) Is Croatia implementing the European trends in urban governance? The main premise is that the process of European integration and institutionalization of relations between the European institutions and the Republic of Croatia has initialized the implementation of structural and functional reforms in the local government. The main hypothesis is set affirmatively: It is assumed that the majority of recommendations for good local governance have been adopted in the Croatian legal framework. For the purpose of hypothesis testing the legal analysis, teleological and linguistic method has been used on European and national legal documents (hard and “soft” law). The research has shown that: (1) There are 16 European principles for good local governance, and (2) all of them are implemented in Croatian legislation through a number of different standards. Therefore, the hypothesis has been proven. The research confirmed that the formal requirements for urban governance in Croatia are provided. In addition, the chapter recommends empirical research of practical implementation of the principles in everyday activities of the local institutions.

Keywords

Local government Urban governance Development policies Strategic planning Participatory democracy Croatia 

References

  1. Alexander L (2013) What are principles, and do they exist? Legal studies research paper series, No. 13-119Google Scholar
  2. Alexy R, Rivers J (2010) A theory of constitutional rights. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen D (2000) Cohesion and structural funds. Transfers and trade-offs. In: Wallace H, Wallace W (eds) Policy-making in the European Union, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Bache I (2007) Cohesion policy. In: Graziano P, Vink MP (eds) Europeanization. New research agendas. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Barry BW (1997) Strategic planning workbook for public and nonprofit organizations. Amherst Wilder Foundation, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  6. Börze T, Risse T (2003) Conceptualizing the domestic impact of Europe. In: Fetherstone K, Radaelli CM (eds) The politics of Europeanization. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryson JM (2011) Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations. In: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement, 4th edn. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  8. Dobrić D (2014) Europeanization of local self-governance. Dissertation, University of ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  9. Dworkin R (2003) Shvaćanje prava ozbiljno. Translation: Rusan R, Matulović M. Zagreb, KruzakGoogle Scholar
  10. Đokić I, Rašić Bakarić I, Šišinački J (2010) Strategic program of local development—Croatian experience. Institute of Economics, ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  11. Kassim H (2005) The Europeanization of member state institutions. In: Bulmer S, Lequesne C (eds) The member states of European Union. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Katenhusen I, Lamping W (2003) Demokratien in Europa. Leske+Budrich, OpladenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kearney C (2013) Development programming, negotiation and evaluation: lessons for the future. In: Bachtler J, Turok I (eds) The coherence of EU regional policy. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Kordej De-Villa Ž (2009) On sustainable development. In: Kordej De-Villa Ž, Stubbs P, Sumpor M (eds) Participatory governance for sustainable development. Institute of Economics, ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  15. Ladrech R (2002) Europeanization and political parties: towards a framework for analysis. Party Polit 8(4):389–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ladrech R (2005) The Europeanization of interest groups and political parties. In: Bulmer S, Lequesne C (eds) The member states of the European Union. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Ladrech R (2009) Europeanization and political parties. Living Rev Eur Gov 4(1). http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2009-1. Accessed 1 Apr 2015
  18. Ladrech R (2010) Europeanization and national politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, New York Google Scholar
  19. Mair P (2007) Political parties and party systems. In: Graziano P, Vink MP (eds) Europeanization. New research agenda. Palgrave Macmillan, HoundmillsGoogle Scholar
  20. McCormick J (2011) Understanding the European Union: a concise introduction. 5th edition. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Mitchell R, Agle B, Wood D (1997) Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886Google Scholar
  22. Pfeiffer JW, Goodstein LD, Nolan TM (1986) Applied strategic planning: a how to do it guide. University Associates, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  23. Puljiz J (2005) Economic development. In: Rüdiger P (ed) How to encourage development at the local level. Handbook with examples of the best practice from South-Eastern Europe. Zagreb, Friedrich Ebert StiftungGoogle Scholar
  24. Rothwell WJ (1986) The strategic planning workshop. Human Resources Development Press, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  25. Schlag PJ (1985) Rules and standards. UCLA Law Rev 33(2):379–406Google Scholar
  26. Senden L (2004) Soft law in European community law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Senden L (2005) Soft law, self-regulation and co-regulation in European law: where do they meet? Electron J Comp Law 9(1). http://www.ejcl.org/. Accessed 25 Mar 2015
  28. Shapiro SJ (2007) The “Hart-Dworkin” debate: a short guide for the perplexed. Public law and legal theory working paper series, Working Paper No. 77Google Scholar
  29. Sošić M (2006) Europeizacija nacionalnih politika: koncept i istraživački pristup. Anali hrvat politol druš 3(1):229–246Google Scholar
  30. Sumpor M (2009) Introduction to development management, sustainable development and coordination. In: Kordej De-Villa Ž, Stubbs P, Sumpor M (eds) Participatory governance for sustainable development. Institute of Economics, ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  31. Stubbs P (2009) Participation, partnership and/or support: internal and external stakeholders in sustainable development. In: Kordej De-Villa Ž, Stubbs P, Sumpor M (eds) Participatory governance for sustainable development. The Institute of Economics, ZagrebGoogle Scholar

Legal Documents

  1. Council of Europe Google Scholar
  2. European Committee on Local and Regional Democracy (2007) The Valencia Declaration. MCL-15 (2007) 5 final, 16 October 2007 Google Scholar
  3. The Congress (1992) European Urban Charter. 18 March 1992 Google Scholar
  4. The Congress (1995) Opinion 1 on the draft Recommendation No. R (95) of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the implementation of the principle of subsidiarity prepared by the CDLR. 30 May 1995 Google Scholar
  5. The Congress (1996) Recommendation 19 on aspects of urban policies in Europe. 05 July 1996 Google Scholar
  6. The Congress (2003) Recommendation 133 on management of capital cities. 22 May 2003 Google Scholar
  7. The Congress (2008) Recommendation 251 European Urban Charter II—Manifesto for a new urbanity. 28 May 2008 Google Scholar

European Union

  1. Bristol Accord, the Informal Council of Ministers on sustainable communities, Bristol, 6–7 December 2005Google Scholar
  2. Committee of Regions (2002) Opinion on “Partnerships between local and regional authorities and social economy organizations: contribution to employment, local development and social cohesion”. OJ C 192, 12 August 2002 Google Scholar
  3. Committee of Regions (2013) Opinion on “Empowering local authorities in partner countries for enhanced governance and more effective development outcomes”. OJ C 356, 05 December 2013 Google Scholar
  4. European Commission (2001) European governance. A White Paper. COM (2001) 428 final, 25 July 2001 Google Scholar
  5. European Commission (2005) Communication from the Commission to the Spring European Council, Working together for growth and jobs: a new start for the Lisbon Strategy. COM (2005) 0024 final, 02 February 2005 Google Scholar
  6. European Commission (2008) Local authorities: actors for development. COM (2008) 0626 final, 08 October2008 Google Scholar
  7. European Commission (2010a) Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM (2010) 2020 final, 03 March 2010 Google Scholar
  8. European Commission (2010b) EU development policy in support of inclusive growth and sustainable development. Increasing the impact of EU development policy. A Green Paper. COM (2010) 629 final, 10 November 2010 Google Scholar
  9. European Commission (2013) Empowering Local Authorities in partner countries for enhanced governance and more effective development outcomes. COM (2013) 0280 final, 15 May 2013 Google Scholar
  10. European Parliament (2007) Resolution on local authorities and development cooperation. OJ C 301E, 13.12.2007 Google Scholar
  11. European Parliament (2010) Resolution on the draft Commission decision establishing the 2009 Annual Action Programme for Non-State Actors and Local Authorities in Development. OJ C 212E, 05 August 2010 Google Scholar
  12. European Union (2012) The Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. OJ C 326, 26 October 2012 Google Scholar
  13. Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities, the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for spatial planning and urban development, Leipzig, 24–25 May 2007Google Scholar
  14. Lille Action Programme (2000) The informal council of ministers responsible for urban affairs, Lille. Accessed 3 Nov 2000Google Scholar
  15. Urban Acquis, the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for territorial cohesion, Rotterdam, 29 November 2004Google Scholar

Republic of Croatia

  1. Financing of Local and Regional Government Units Act, Official Gazette, no. 117/93, 69/97, 33/00, 73/00, 127/00, 59/01, 107/01, 117/01, 150/02, 147/03, 132/06, 26/07, 73/08, 25/12Google Scholar
  2. City of Zagreb Act, Official Gazette, no. 62/01, 125/08, 36/09Google Scholar
  3. Local and Regional Self-Government Act, Official Gazette, no. 19/13Google Scholar
  4. Access to Information Act, Official Gazette, no. 25/13Google Scholar
  5. Budget Act, Official Gazette, no. 87/08, 136/12Google Scholar
  6. Regional Development Act, Official Gazette, no. 153/09Google Scholar
  7. Environment protection Act, Official Gazette, no. 80/13Google Scholar
  8. Public-Private Partnership Act, Official Gazette, no. 78/12, 152/14Google Scholar
  9. Local Elections Act, Official Gazette, no. 144/12Google Scholar
  10. Referendum Act, Official Gazette, no. 33/96, 92/01, 44/06, 58/06, 69/07, 38/09Google Scholar
  11. Act on the Use of EU Structural Instruments, Official Gazette, no. 78/12, 143/13, 157/13Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of RijekaRijekaCroatia

Personalised recommendations