Assessment of Socio-Economic Status Relevance for Latvian Electoral Participation

Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)


In many countries, there is increasing concern about the decrease in the level of electoral participation in all types of elections. The situation in Latvia is not an exception. Despite the fact that the first scientific studies of electoral participation analysis date back to the 1940s–1950s, it is still relevant today to understand and explain the factors that affect the citizen’s choice (not) to participate in elections. The goal of this chapter was to find the factors that influence participation in elections in Latvia, and indirectly how it may affect local government and urban governance processes in the country. Using data from two elections in Latvia—local elections in 2013 and elections to the European Parliament in 2014—the authors examined whether there is coherence between factors of participation intensity and socio-economic status (education, income, employment, and so on). In total, data of 22 socio-economic variables were tested, which are used by the government for planning and organising the development policy of local governments. To achieve the goal, the authors used a logistic regression approach. Analysis showed that level of education is a significant factor, both in the European Parliament and in the local elections. But socio-economic factors correlate more clearly with participation in the European Parliament elections, namely income of the resident’s birth rate and region of residence. Participation in local elections is affected by contextual factors that are specific to each local government.


Local government Local election European Parliament election Socio-economic status Voter turnout Citizens’ participation Urban governance Latvia 


  1. Almond GA, Verba S (1989) The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bendor J, Diermeier D, Ting M (2003) A behavioral model of turnout. Am Polit Sci Rev 97(2):261–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brady H (1999) Political participation. In: Measures of political attitudes. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 737–801Google Scholar
  4. Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia (2013) Regulations on revenues of local government finance equalization funds and their distribution order Nr:1433. Accessed 4 April 2015.
  5. Denters B, Goldsmith M, Ladner A, Mouritzen PE, Rose LE (2014) Size and local democracy. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duch R (1998) Participation in the new democracies of Central and Eastern Europe: cultural versus rational choice explanations. In: Barnes SH, Simon J (eds) The postcommunist citizen. Erasmus Foundation and Institute dor Political Science of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, pp 195–228Google Scholar
  7. European Commission (2012) Standard Eurobarometer 78. Accessed 4 April 2015.
  8. European Commission (2013) Standard Eurobarometer 80. Accessed 4 April 2015.
  9. European Commission (2014) Standard Eurobarometer 82. Accessed 4 April 2015.
  10. Feddersen TJ (2004) Rational choice theory and the paradox of not voting. J Econ Perspect 18(1):99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geys B (2006) Explaining voter turnout: a review of aggregate-level research. Electoral Stud 25(4):637–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Henn M, Weinstein M, Wring D (2002) A generation apart? Youth and political participation in Britain. Br J Politics Int Relat 4(2):167–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hooghe M, Quintelier E (2013) Political participation in Europe. In: Keil IS, Gabriel O (eds) Society and democracy in Europe. Routledge, London, pp 220–243Google Scholar
  14. Keil SI, Gabriel OW (eds) (2013) Society and democracy in Europe. Routledge, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Marien S, Hooghe M, Quintelier E (2010) Inequalities in non-institutionalised forms of political participation: a multi-level analysis of 25 countries. Polit Stud 58(1):187–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marketing and public opinion research centre SKDS (2014) Survey of Latvian residents—study of voter attitude 2014. CEC of Latvia. Accessed 15 June 2015
  17. Pacek AC, Pop-Eleches G, Tucker JA (2009) Disenchanted or discerning: voter turnout in postcommunist countries. J Polit 71(2):473–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Parliament of the Republic of Latvia (1994) The City Council and Municipality Council Election LawGoogle Scholar
  19. Parliament of the Republic of Latvia (2004) Law on Elections to the European ParliamentGoogle Scholar
  20. Parliament of the Republic of Latvia (2010) Law on Separation of Roja Municipality and Launch of Operation of the Newly Established MunicipalitiesGoogle Scholar
  21. Pateman C (1970) Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 119Google Scholar
  22. Putnam RD, Leonardi R, Nanett RY (1993) Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosenstone SJ, Hansen JM (2003) Mobilization, participation and democracy in America. Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Sartori G (1970) Concept misformation in comparative politics. Am Polit Sci Rev 64(4):1033–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schlozman KL (2002) Citizens’ participation in America: what do we know? Why do we care? In: Katznelson I, Milner HV (eds) Political science: state of the discipline. W.W.Norton & Company, New York, pp 431–461Google Scholar
  26. Seimuskane L, Marketing and public opinion research centre SKDS (2012) Survey of Latvian residents—assessment of citizens’ participation and democracy in local governments in LatviaGoogle Scholar
  27. Seimuskane L, Vilka I, Brekis E (2015) Institucionālo un neinstitucionālo līdzdalības formu salīdzinājums pašvaldībās Latvijā. Latvijas intereses Eiropas Savienībā 2:54–64Google Scholar
  28. Smith M (2009) The inequality of participation: re-examining the role of social stratification and post-communism on political participation in Europe. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociol Rev 45(3):487–517Google Scholar
  29. Stoker G (2006) The decline of citizen engagement? In: Why politics matters making democracy work. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 87–102Google Scholar
  30. Van Deth JW (2001) Studying political participation: towards a theory of everything? Mobilisation, Organisation and Participation via new ICTs, p 19Google Scholar
  31. Verba S, Schlozman KL, Brady HE (1995) Voice and equality: civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Vilka I (2013) Administratīvi teritoriālais iedalījums un pašvaldības. In: Stradiņš J (ed) Latvieši un Latvija. III sējums. Atjaunotā Latvijas valsts. Latvijas Zinātņu akadēmija (Latvian Academy of Science), Riga, pp 214–242Google Scholar
  33. Vilka I, Brekis E (2013) Comparing local government elections in Latvia and other European countries. Soc Res 3(32):5–16Google Scholar
  34. Vilka I, Seimuskane L (2012) The evaluation of local government reform in Latvia from current perspective. In: The 20th NISPAcee annual conference public administration: east and west: twenty years of development, Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia, 23–26 May 2012, CDGoogle Scholar
  35. VRAA (State Regional Development Agancy) (2013) Attīstības centru ietekmes areālu noteikšana un analīze. Plānošanas reģionu, republikas pilsētu un novadu pašvaldību attīstības raksturojums, Riga, p 151. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
  36. Zukin C, Keeter S, Andolina M, Jenkins K, Delli Carpini MX (2006) A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and changing Americas citizen. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Data Bases

  1. Central Election Commission (CEC) of the Republic of Latvia
  2. Central Statistical Bureau (CSB) of the Republic of Latvia
  3. Office of Citizenship and Migration Affairs (OSMA) of the Republic of Latvia
  4. State Regional Development Agency (SRDA)
  5. State Social Insurance Agency (SSIA) of the Republic of Latvia

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LatviaRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations