Skip to main content

Current Paradigm: Neoclassical Investment Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applied Investment Theory
  • 891 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Act 1, scene 1. ‘Bottom’ refers to a ship.

  2. 2.

    Factors are available from Ken French’s website at http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library/f-f_factors.html.

  3. 3.

    A typical example is the ExxonMobil Corporation Hebron project which is in about 100 metres of water off north-east Canada. The field was discovered in 1980, and required about six years to design and construct after 2009. It is expected to have a total capital cost of around USD 6 billion and produce up to 180 thousand barrels of oil per day for 30-plus years (Development Application Summary, 2011 available at www.hebronproject.com).

Bibliography

  • Ambachsheer, K. (2005). “Beyond Portfolio Theory: The Next Frontier.” Financial Analysts Journal 61 (1): 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. and G. Debreu (1954). “Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy.” Econometrica: 265–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. E. (2005). The Economics of Financial Markets. Cambridge UK, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, S. (1977). “The Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price-Earnings Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Markets Hypothesis.” Journal of Finance 32: 663–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benink, H. and P. Bossaerts (2001). “An Exploration of Neo-Austrian Theory Applied to Financial Markets.” The Journal of Finance 56 (3): 1011–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernoulli, D. (1738, translated 1954). “Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk.” Econometrica 22: 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., M. C. Jensen and M. Scholes (1972). “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests” in M. C. Jensen (ed) Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets. New York, Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. and M. Scholes (1973). “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy 81: 637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodie, Z., A. Kane and A. J. Marcus (2011). Investments (9th Edition). New York, McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. (1994). “Introduction” in P. J. Boettke (ed) The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Aldershot UK, Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. E. (1935). “The Theory of a Single Investment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 49 (3): 479–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brealey, R., S. C. Myers and F. Allen (2014). Principles of Corporate Finance (11th edition). New York, McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brealey, R. A., S. C. Myers and A. J. Marcus (2012). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance. New York, McGraw-Hill Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W., J. Lakonishok and B. LeBaron (1992). “Simple Technical Trading Rules and the Stochastic Properties of Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance 47 (6): 1731–1764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carhart, M. M. (1997). “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance.” The Journal of Finance 52 (1): 57–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciana, P. (2011). New Frontiers in Technical Analysis: Effective Tools and Strategies for Trading and Investing. Hoboken NJ, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, G. P. E. (1963). “A Model of the Trust Investment Process” in E. A. Feigenbaum and J. Feldman (ed) Computers and Thought. New York, McGraw-Hill Inc: 347371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran, A. (2002). Investment Valuation. New York, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, G. M. (2011). “Austrian Foundations for the Theory and Practice of Finance.” Journal of Economics and Finance Education 10 (2): 70–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E. J., M. J. Gruber, S. P. A. Brown and W. N. Goetzmann (2010). Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis (8th edition). New York, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espahbodi, H., P. Espahbodi and R. Espahbodi (2015). “Did Analyst Forecast Accuracy and Dispersion Improve After 2002 Following the Increase in Regulation?” Financial Analysts Journal 71 (5): 20–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, J. (2006). “Downside Risk in Practice.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 18 (1): 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. (1970). “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.” The Journal of Finance 25 (2): 383–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and K. R. French (1993). “Common Risk Factors in the Returns of Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics 33 (1): 3–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and K. R. French (1995). “Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns”. The Journal of Finance 50 (1): 131–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and K. R. French (2004). “Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (3): 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. and J. D. MacBeth (1973). “Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests” The Journal of Political Economy 81 (3): 607–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P. A. (2003). Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits and Other Writings. Hoboken NJ, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, J. C. and D. Kim (2013). Modern Portfolio Theory. Hoboken NJ, John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurter, G. M. (2006). “The Theory of Fair Markets (TFM) Toward a New Finance Paradigm.” International Review of Financial Analysis 15 (1): 130–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, A. and P. Santa-Clara (2003). “Idiosyncratic Risk Matters!” The Journal of Finance 58 (3): 975–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. (2014). “A Behavioural Theory of the Fund Management Firm.” The European Journal of Finance: 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooke, J. C. (2010). Security Analysis and Business Valuation on Wall Street. Hoboken NJ, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, A. P., L. F. Lee and S. Z. Shu (2012). “Do Managers Always Know Better? The Relative Accuracy of Management and Analyst Forecasts.” Journal of Accounting Research 50 (5): 1217–1244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling (1976). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1987). “The Austrian School of Economics” in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (ed) Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970, 2nd edition). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintner, J. (1965). “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Share Portfolios and Capital Budgets.” Review of Economics and Statistics 47: 13–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, A. W. (2004). “The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis: Market Efficiency from an Evolutionary Perspective.” Journal of Portfolio Management 30: 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, B. G. (2003). “The Efficient Market Hypothesis and Its Critics”. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (1): 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, B. G. and Y. Xu (1997). “Risk and Return Revisited.” Journal of Portfolio Management 23 (3): 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. M. (1952). “Portfolio Selection.” The Journal of Finance 7: 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkhoff, L. (2010). “The Use of Technical Analysis by Fund Managers: International Evidence.” Journal of Banking & Finance 34 (11): 2573–2586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (Ed.). (1874). On the Definition of Political Economy, and on the Method of Investigation Proper to It. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy. London, JW Parker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. H. and F. Modigliani (1961). “Dividend Policy, Growth and Valuation of Shares.” Journal of Business 34: 411–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, R. A. (2010). “Toward a Theory of Behavioral Finance: Implications from the Natural Sciences.” Qualitative Research in Financial Markets 2 (2): 100–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, R. A. and G. H. Troughton (2000). “Are Risk Premium Anomalies Caused by Ambiguity?” Financial Analysts Journal 56 (2): 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman, S. H. (1996). “The Articulation of Price-Earnings Ratios and Market-to-Book Ratios and the Evaluation of Growth.” Journal of Accounting Research 34 (2): 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. A. (1976). “The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing.” Journal of Economic Theory 13 (3): 341–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. A. (2002). “Neoclassical Finance, Alternative Finance and the Closed End Fund Puzzle.” European Financial Management 8 (2): 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, M. S. (1972). “The Market for Securities: Substitution Versus Price Pressure and the Effects of Information on Share Prices.” Journal of Business 45: 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. F. (1964). “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk.” The Journal of Finance 19 (3): 424–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shynkevich, A. (2012). “Performance of Technical Analysis in Growth and Small Cap Segments of the US Equity Market.” Journal of Banking & Finance 36 (1): 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1759, republished 2002). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soros, G. (1994). “The Theory of Reflexivity.” Speech to the MIT Department of Economics World Economy Laboratory Conference, Washington DC Retrieved 12 November 2003, www.soros.org/textfiles/speeches/042694_Theory_of_Reflexivity.txt.

  • Statman, M. (1999). “Behaviorial Finance: Past Battles and Future Engagements.” Financial Analysts Journal 55 (6): 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statman, M. (2010). “What Is Behavioral Finance?” in A. S. Wood (ed) Behavioral Finance and Investment Management. Charlottesville VA, Research Foundation of CFA Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (2006). The Theory of Corporate Finance. Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walras, L. (1877, reprinted 1954). Elements of Pure Economics. Homewood IL, Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. B. (1938). The Theory of Investment Value. Flint Hill VA, Fraser Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coleman, L. (2016). Current Paradigm: Neoclassical Investment Theory. In: Applied Investment Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43976-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43976-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43975-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43976-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics