Abstract
If procurement processes are to be taken seriously, purchase managers need decision support tools beyond those that only ascertain that the formal requirements are met. This chapter demonstrates some fundamental flaws with common models used in procurement situations, flaws that are so serious that the evaluations of tenders often become meaningless and may lead to large and costly miscalculations. We demonstrate how the equitability of the tender evaluations can be significantly improved through the use of multi-criteria decision analysis with numerically imprecise input information. Due to this, the computational part of the evaluation step becomes more complex, and algorithms targeted for decision evaluation with imprecise data are used. We therefore present a procurement decision tool, DecideIT, implementing such algorithms that can be used as an instrument for a more meaningful procurement process. Of importance is to allow for a more realistic degree of precision in the valuation and ranking of tenders under each evaluation criterion, as well as the associated weighting of the criteria, since the criteria are often of a more qualitative nature. Through this, both quantitative and qualitative statements could be easily managed within the same framework and without the need to introduce ad-hoc and often arbitrary conversion formulas supposed to capture the trade-off between criteria.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
Att utvärdera anbud - utvärderingsmodeller i teori och praktik, Rapport 2009–10, Konkurrensverket (in Swedish).
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
Article 90 of the EU directive on public procurement, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0024&from=EN.
References
Bergman, M.A., Lundberg, S.: Tender evaluation and supplier selection methods in public procurement. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 19 (2), 73–83 (2013)
de Boer, L., Labro, E., Morlacchi, P.: A review of methods supporting supplier selection. Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 7 (2), 75–89 (2001)
Caster, O., Ekenberg, L.: Combining Second-Order Belief Distributions with Qualitative Statements in Decision Analysis, pp. 67–87. Springer, Berlin (2012)
Danielson, M.: Handling imperfect user statements in real-life decision analysis. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 3, 513–534 (2004)
Danielson, M.: Sensitivity analysis in interval decision modelling. Eng. Lett. 17 (1), 1–7 (2009)
Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L.: A method for decision and risk analysis in probabilistic and multiple criteria situations. Patent (2007). U.S. Patent No. 11/145229
Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L., Johansson, J., Larsson, A.: The decideit decision tool. In: ISIPTA 03, pp. 204–217 (2003)
Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L., Idefeldt, J., Larsson, A.: Using a software tool for public decision analysis: the case of Nacka municipality. Decis. Anal. 4, 76–90 (2007)
Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L., Ekenberg, A., Torsten Hökby, Lidén, J.: Decision process support for participatory democracy. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 15, 15–30 (2008)
Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L., Larsson, A., Riabacke, M.: Transparent Public Decision Making: Discussion and Case Study in Sweden, pp. 263–281. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Ding, X.S., Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L.: Non-linear programming solvers for decision analysis support systems. In: International Conference on Operations Research 2003, pp. 475–482 (2004)
Figueira, J.R., Greco, S., Slowinski, R.: Building a set of additive value functions representing a reference preorder and intensities of preference: grip method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 195 (2), 460–486 (2009)
GarcĂa-Cascales, M.S., Lamata, M.T.: Solving a decision problem with linguistic information. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 28, 2284–2294 (2007)
Greco, S., Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R.: Ordinal regression revisited: multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 191 (2), 416–436 (2008)
Harland, C., Telgen, J., Callender, G.: International Research Study of Public Procurement, pp. 372–399. SAGE, London (2013)
Ho, W., Xu, X., Dey, P.K.: Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202 (1), 16–24 (2010)
Jiménez, A., Mateos, A., Sabio, P.: Dominance intensity measure within fuzzy weight oriented MAUT: an application. Omega 41 (2), 397–405 (2013)
Larsson, A., Johansson, J., Ekenberg, L., Danielson, M.: Decision analysis with multiple objectives in a framework for evaluating imprecision. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzz. Knowl. Based Syst. 13 (5), 495–509 (2005)
Lee, K.S., Park, K.S., Kim, S.H.: Dominance, potential optimality, imprecise information, and hierarchical structure in multi-criteria analysis. Comput. Oper. Res. 29 (9), 1267–1281 (2002)
Lunander, A., Arne, A.: Metoder vid utvärdering av pris och kvalitet i offentlig upphandling, 11 (2004)
McCrudden, C.: Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes. Nat. Res. Forum 28 (4), 257–267 (2004)
Salo, A.A., Hämäläinen, R.P.: Preference ratios in multiattribute evaluation (prime) – elicitation and decision procedures under incomplete information. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 31 (6), 533–545 (2001)
Stilger, P.S., Siderius, J., van Raaij, E.M.: A Comparative Study of Formulas for Choosing the Economically Most Advantageous Tender (2015). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2626934
Sundgren, D., Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L.: Warp effects on calculating interval probabilities. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 50, 1360–1368 (2009)
Telgen, J., Uenk, N., Lohmann, W., Manunza, E.: Conditions on lots: practical desirability versus legal acceptability. In: Piga, G., Tatrai, T., (eds.) Public Procurement Policy. The Economics of Legal Relationships, pp. 90–98. Routledge, London (2015)
Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Benton, W.C.: Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 50, 2–18 (1991)
Weber, M.: A method of multi attribute decision making with incomplete information. Manag. Sci. 31 (11), 1365–1371 (1985)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L., Göthe, M., Larsson, A. (2016). A Decision Analytical Perspective on Public Procurement Processes. In: Papathanasiou, J., Ploskas, N., Linden, I. (eds) Real-World Decision Support Systems. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 37. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43916-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43916-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43915-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43916-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)