Skip to main content

Quantitative Indices and Formula for Localizing the Neo-umbilicus During Abdominoplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 831 Accesses

Abstract

Enormous efforts have been made so far by plastic surgeons and investigators to describe the normal anatomic features of the umbilicus. It’s evident that these information are needed to allow us to determine the proper position of the neo-umbilicus during abdominoplasty or any procedure that affects the original umbilical location. Umbilicus is reported to be low riding (below the center at the vertical plain) and almost at the midline in majority of studies. Three formulas have been developed so far in Indian, Iranian, and Croatian populations. There is no superiority for any of those models over the other. As expected before, there is a geographic variation in anthropometric features and the location of umbilicus on abdominal wall across different study populations. Further studies with larger and ethnically diverse study populations as well as validation studies are needed to allow us to endorse the use of these formulas in all umbilicoplasty patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dudukovic M, Kisic H, Baez ML, Bulic K, Veir Z, Cvjeticanin B, Dujmovic A, Stipic I, Suman O, Mijatovic D. Anatomical prediction for surgical positioning of the umbilicus in a Croatian population. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;75(2):135–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baroudi R. Umbilicoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 1975;2:431.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vernon S. Umbilical transplantation upward and abdominal contouring in lipectomy. Am J Surg. 1957;94(3):490–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abhyankar SV, Rajguru AG, Patil PA. Anatomical localization of the umbilicus: an Indian study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(4):1153–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cavale N, Butler PE. The ideal female umbilicus? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(5):356e–7e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Craig SB, Faller MS, Puckett CL. In search of the ideal female umbilicus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee SJ, Garg S, Lee HP. Computer-aided analysis of the “beautiful” umbilicus. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34(5):748–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rozen SM, Redett R. The two-dermal-flap umbilical transposition: a natural and aesthetic umbilicus after abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(7):2255–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Choudhary S, Taams KO. Umbilicosculpture: a concept revisited. Br J Plast Surg. 1998;51(7):538–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubou R, Ousterhout DK. Placement of the umbilicus in an abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;61(2):291–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dellon AL. The midline umbilicus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(4):1301–2; author reply 1302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Parnia R, Ghorbani L, Sepehrvand N, Hatami S, Bazargan-Hejazi S. Determining anatomical position of the umbilicus in Iranian girls, and providing quantitative indices and formula to determine neo-umbilicus during abdominoplasty. Indian J Plast Surg. 2012;45(1):94–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chin SH, Martin WJ, Matarasso A. Do waistline and umbilical position really change after abdominoplasty? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(1):27e–8e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rohrich RJ, Sorokin ES, Brown SA, Gibby DL. Is the umbilicus truly midline? Clinical and medicolegal implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(1):259–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dick ET. Umbilicoplasty as a treatment for persistent umbilical infection. Aust N Z J Surg. 1970;39:380.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grant B. Grant’s method of anatomy. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hinderer UT. The dermolipectomy approach for augmentation mammaplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 1975;2(3):359–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodriguez-Feliz JR, Makhijani S, Przybyla A, Hill D, Chao J. Intraoperative assessment of the umbilicopubic distance: a reliable anatomic landmark for transposition of the umbilicus. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012;36(1):8–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ambardar S, Cabot J, Cekic V, Baxter K, Arnell TD, Forde KA, Nihalani A, Whelan RL. Abdominal wall dimensions and umbilical position vary widely with BMI and should be taken into account when choosing port locations. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(9):1995–2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. El-Sharkawy A, Said T, Shafik I, Khalifa H. A study of the aesthetic patterns of the umbilicus among Egyptians with a new technique for umbilical reconstruction de novo. Kasr El-Aini J Surg. 2004;5(3):87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Danilla S, Bonasic S. Anatomical localization of the umbilicus: a statistical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(3):1123–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro 3rd AF, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9):604–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Greene T, Zhang YL, Beck GJ, Froissart M, Hamm LL, Lewis table JB, Mauer M, Navis GJ, et al. Comparative performance of the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equations for estimating GFR levels above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56(3):486–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nariman Sepehrvand M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sepehrvand, N., Hatami, S. (2017). Quantitative Indices and Formula for Localizing the Neo-umbilicus During Abdominoplasty. In: Shiffman, M. (eds) Adult Umbilical Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43887-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43887-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43885-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43887-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics