Abstract
This chapter draws on the literature on open innovation and global supply chains to place innovative and high-tech small and medium-sized enterprises in their increasingly global context of distributed, often complementary production resources and a complex layering of labour and resource markets where research and development, routine manufacturing, final assembly and after-market support may all be present in the same location, yet each may be contributing to different product chains and sectors (Castells, The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell, 2000; Dicken, Global shift: Transforming the world’s economy (4th ed.). London: Paul Chapman London, 2003). It argues that new forms of intermediation and dis-intermediation between businesses and between these businesses and their customers provide both an opportunity and an imperative for entrepreneurs and start-ups to develop new strategies with which to operate in a complex environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cai, Y. (2013). Enhancing context sensitivity of the triple helix model: An institutional logics perspective. Paper presented at Triple Helix XI International Conference: The triple helix in a context of global change: Continuing, mutating or unravelling, London, 8–10 July.
Castells, M. (1989). The informational city information technology, economic restructuring and the urban-regional process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
China Britain Business Council. (2008). Opportunities for UK businesses in China’s regional cities. London: UK Trade and Investment.
Dicken, P. (2003). Global shift: Transforming the world’s economy (4th ed.). London: Paul Chapman London.
Dobbs, R., Smit, S., Remes, J., Manyika, J., Roxburgh, C., & Restropo, A. (2011). Urban world: Mapping the economic power of cities. Washington, DC: McKinsey Global Institute.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The endless transition: A ‘triple helix’ of university-industry-government relations. Minerva, 36, 203–208.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Immelt, J. R., Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. (2009). How GE is disrupting itself. Harvard Business Review, 87(10), 56–65.
Inoue, T. (1998, January 26). Small businesses flourish in virtual village. Nikkei Weekly, 1.
Kavaratzis, M. (2012). From ‘necessary evil’ to necessity: Stakeholders’ involvement in place branding. Journal of Place Management and Development, 5(1), 7–19.
Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The triple helix: An evolutionary model of innovations. Research Policy, 29, 243–255.
Markusen, A., & King, D. (2003). The artistic dividend: The arts’ hidden contributions to regional development. Minneapolis, MN: Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs. Retrieved from http://www.hhh.umn.edu/img/assets/6158/artistic_dividend.pdf
Prahalad, C. K. (2006). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.
Raymond, E. S. (2001). The cathedral and the bazaar: Musings on linux and opensource by an accidental revolutionary (Rev. Edition). Sebastopol: O’Reilly.
Rich, B. R., & Janos, L. (1995). Skunk works. London: Warner Books.
Smith, D. J. (2013). Power-by-the-hour’: The role of technology in re-shaping business strategy at Rolls Royce. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 25(8), 987–1007.
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vermeulen, M. (2002). The Netherlands, holiday country. In T. Hauben, M. Vermeulen, & V. Patteeuw (Eds.), City branding: Image building and building images. Rotterdam: NAI Uitgevers.
Vernon, R. (1971). Sovereignty at bay: The multinational spread of US enterprises. New York: Basic Books.
Wenger, E. (2003). Communities of practice and social learning systems. In D. Nicolini, S. Gherardi, & D. Yanow (Eds.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Zeng, Y. (2006). De facto federalism and dynamics of central-local relations in China. Discussion Paper 8, China Policy Institute, Nottingham University, Nottingham.
Zeng, M., & Williamson, P. J. (2007). Dragons at your door: How Chinese cost innovation is disrupting global competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Little, S.E. (2017). Global Networks, Open Innovation and Entrepreneurial Firms. In: Little, S., Go, F., Poon, TC. (eds) Global Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43859-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43859-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43858-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43859-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)