Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Informal Institutions and the Geography of Innovation: An Integrative Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Abstract

Integrating the insights from both institutional theory and economic geography, we develop a new conceptual framework to explain how formal and informal institutions in developing countries influence knowledge exchanges within and across geographical locations, thus affecting entrepreneurs’ and firms’ innovative behaviors and outputs. We suggest that the prevalence of informal institutions in developing countries increases the importance of geographic proximity for knowledge exchanges. At the same time, informal institutions provide alternative channels for maintaining non-local social interactions that facilitate knowledge exchanges among geographically distant firms. Using China as the context, we provide theoretical propositions that illustrate these mechanisms in terms of the different innovative behaviors between domestic Chinese firms and multinational companies operating in China. This article provides a fresh perspective on how the geography of innovation is embedded in institutional environments. It enriches the literature by highlighting the important role of informal institutions in influencing innovation and how firms, especially entrepreneurial ones, vary their innovative behaviors depending on the extent of their embeddedness in the informal institutions.

$Authors contributed equally and listed in alphabetical order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdi, E., & Aulakh, P. S. (2012). Do country-level institutional frameworks and interfirm governance arrangements substitute or complement in international business relationship. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(5), 477–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson, E., & Fombrun, C. J. (1994). Macrocultures: Determinants and consequences. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 728–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcácer, J., & Chung, W. (2007). Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Science, 53(5), 760–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1999). Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45(7), 905–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P., & Phene, A. (2004). Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: The influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8/9), 847–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arikan, A. T. (2009). Interfirm knowledge exchanges and the knowledge creation capability of clusters. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 658–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for technology: The economics of innovation and corporate strategy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity (pp. 609–625). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista, R., & Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more? Research Policy, 27(5), 525–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batjargal, B., Hitt, M. A., Tsui, A. S., Arregle, J. L., Webb, J. W., & Miller, T. (2013). Institutional polycentrism, entrepreneurs’ social networks and new venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1024–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry, C. (2001). Entry, growth, and patenting in industrial clusters: A study of the aerospace industry in the UK. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(3), 405–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G. G. (2005). Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G. G., & Zaheer, A. (2007). Geography, networks, and knowledge flow. Organization Science, 18(6), 955–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. J., Tracey, P., & Heide, J. B. (2009). The organization of regional clusters. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 623–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eapen, A. (2012). Social structure and technology spillovers from foreign to domestic firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(2), 244–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, G., & Wang, X. (2006). NERI index of marketization of China’s provinces. Beijing: Economics Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenzen, J., & Nakamoto, K. (1993). Structure, cooperation, and the flow of market information. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(December), 360–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesan, S., Malter, A. J., & Rindfleish, A. (2005). Does distance still matter? Geographic proximity and new product development. Journal of Marketing, 69(October), 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, X., Huang, K. G., & Wang, H. (2015). Institutions and geography of innovation: Innovative outputs of multinational enterprises and domestic firms in China. Working paper, Singapore Management University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Ramamurti, R. (2011). Reverse innovation, emerging markets, and global strategy. Global Strategy Journal, 1, 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T., & Lovas, B. (2004). How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 801–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M. A., Ahlstrom, D., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., & Svobodina, L. (2004). The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs Russia. Organization Science, 15(2), 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, M., Miller, T., Hitt, M. A., & Salmador, P. (2013). The interrelationships among informal institutions, formal institutions, and inward foreign direct investment. Journal of Management, 39(2), 531–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M. C., & Mathews, J. A. (2008). China’s national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 37(9), 1465–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, K. G. (2010). China’s innovation landscape. Science, 329, 632–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, K. G., & Ertug, G. (2014). Mobility, retention and productivity of genomics scientists in the U.S. Nature Biotechnology, 32(9), 953–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, K. G., Geng, X., & Wang, H. (2015). Institutional regime shift in intellectual property rights and patenting strategies of firms in China. Working paper, National University of Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. American Economic Review, 76(5), 984–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000). The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 268–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoury, T. A., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Dau, L. A. (2014). Institutional outsiders and insiders: The response of foreign and domestic inventors to the quality of intellectual property rights protection. Global Strategy Journal, 4(3), 200–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24, 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K., Masciarelli, F., & Prencipe, A. (2012). Regions matter: How localized social capital affects innovation and external knowledge acquisition. Organization Science, 23(1), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2007). From foreign investors to strategic insiders: Shifting parameters, prescriptions and paradigms for MNCs in China. Journal of World Business, 42(1), 14–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics (8th ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, P. (2001). Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 921–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, B. T., & Folta, T. B. (2008). Location matters: Where we have been and where we might go in agglomeration research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 532–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. (1997). The learning region: Institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies, 31(5), 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (1969). Invention, growth and welfare: A theoretical treatment of technological change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. S. (1996). The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 492–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G. P. (1990). The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 153–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Double Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouder, R., & St. John, C. H. (1996). Hot spots and blind spots: Geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1192–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfleisch, A., & Moorman, C. (2001). The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: A strength-of-ties perspective. Journal of Marketing, 65(April), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. (2003). Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49(6), 751–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J. M., & Flyer, F. (2000). Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 21(12), 1175–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. (2007). Asymmetry of knowledge spillovers between MNCs and host country firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5), 764–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, O., & Audia, P. (2000). The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: Geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 424–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. (2001). Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1546–1588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T., & Sorenson, O. (2003). The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 32(2), 229–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J. W., Tihanyi, L., Ireland, R. D., & Sirmon, D. G. (2009). You say illegal, I say legitimate: Entrepreneurship in the informal economy. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 492–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, K. B., Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2009). Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 90–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Z., & Tsui, A. S. (2007). When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xin, K., & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1641–1658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M. (1994). Gifts, favors, and banquets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, M. (2006). Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Science, 52(8), 1185–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singapore

      Xuesong Geng

    2. National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

      Kenneth G. Huang

    Authors
    1. Xuesong Geng
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Kenneth G. Huang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Editor information

    Editors and Affiliations

    1. Asia Pacific Technology Network, Manchester, United Kingdom

      Stephen E. Little

    2. Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands

      Frank M. Go

    3. The Open University, Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong

      Teresa Shuk-Ching Poon

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    Copyright information

    © 2017 The Author(s)

    About this chapter

    Cite this chapter

    Geng, X., Huang, K.G. (2017). Informal Institutions and the Geography of Innovation: An Integrative Perspective. In: Little, S., Go, F., Poon, TC. (eds) Global Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43859-7_4

    Download citation

    Publish with us

    Policies and ethics

    Search

    Navigation