Skip to main content

Role of Dermoscopy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lentigo Maligna Melanoma

Abstract

Lentigo maligna (LM)/lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) typically presents as an isolated pigmented macule or patch on chronically sun damaged skin. At early stages in its clinical presentation the appearance of LM/LMM overlaps with solar lentigo, macular seborrheic keratosis, pigmented actinic keratosis, and lichen planus-like keratosis. Consequently, LMM diagnosis is often delayed or unnecessary biopsies of the aforementioned benign entities are frequently performed. Use of dermoscopy, however, improves diagnostic accuracy for LMM and limits biopsies of its benign simulators. Common dermoscopic features associated with LMM include the presence of asymmetrically pigmented or gray-colored follicular openings and peri-follicular grey dots/granules, which produce the so-called “annular-granular pattern. In addition, LMM can have angulated pigmented lines that join to create zigzag lines or polygonal structures such as rhomboids. In addition to helping with the primary diagnosis of LMM, dermoscopy is used to optimize biopsy site selection, to select treatment margins, and to identify potential recurrence during post-treatment monitoring.

Lentigo maligna/lentigo maligna melanoma (LM/LMM) usually presents as an isolated pigmented macule or patch on chronically sun damaged skin. In its early stages its clinical presentation overlaps with solar lentigo, flat seborrheic keratosis (SK), pigmented actinic keratosis (AK), and lichen planus-like keratosis (LPLK), presenting a diagnostic challenge. As a result, LMM is often not recognized and diagnos is delayed [1]. While Wood’s lamp examination can help to accentuate lesion pigmentation for border detection, it cannot reliably help in differentiating LM/LMM from its benign mimickers [1]. Fortunately, ancillary non-invasive tools such as dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) can improve our diagnostic accuracy for LM/LMM as well as for solar lentigo, flat SK, pigmented AK, and LPLK. Although RCM is quite useful for the diagnosis of LM/LMM, dermoscopy remains the primary imaging instrument used to help identify lesions with the highest likelihood of being LM/LMM. Besides helping in the identification of LM/LMM, dermoscopy can improve LM/LMM margin delineation and to detect potential recurrence after definitive treatment. Finally, when examining LM/LMM lesions with skip areas or clinically discontinuous foci, dermoscopy can aid in biopsy site identification [1, 2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lallas A, Argenziano G, Moscarella E, Longo C, Simonetti V, Zalaudek I. Diagnosis and management of facial pigmented macules. Clin Dermatol. 2014;32(1):94–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schiffner R, Schiffner-Rohe J, Vogt T, Landthaler M, Wlotzke U, Cognetta AB, et al. Improvement of early recognition of lentigo maligna using dermatoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42(1 Pt 1):25–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benvenuto-Andrade C, Dusza SW, Agero AL, Scope A, Rajadhyaksha M, Halpern AC, et al. Differences between polarized light dermoscopy and immersion contact dermoscopy for the evaluation of skin lesions. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(3):329–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vestergaard ME, Macaskill P, Holt PE, Menzies SW. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159(3):669–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bafounta ML, Beauchet A, Aegerter P, Saiag P. Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? Results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137(10):1343–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol. 2002;3(3):159–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pellacani G, Seidenari S. Comparison between morphological parameters in pigmented skin lesion images acquired by means of epiluminescence surface microscopy and polarized-light videomicroscopy. Clin Dermatol. 2002;20(3):222–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cognetta Jr AB, Stolz W, Katz B, Tullos J, Gossain S. Dermatoscopy of lentigo maligna. Dermatol Clin. 2001;19(2):307–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stolz W, Schiffner R, Burgdorf WH. Dermatoscopy for facial pigmented skin lesions. Clin Dermatol. 2002;20(3):276–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaimes N, Marghoob AA, Rabinovitz H, Braun RP, Cameron A, Rosendahl C, et al. Clinical and dermoscopic characteristics of melanomas on nonfacial chronically sun-damaged skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(6):1027–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pehamberger H, Binder M, Steiner A, Wolff K. In vivo epiluminescence microscopy: improvement of early diagnosis of melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. 1993;100(3):356s–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vanden Daelen A, Ferreira I, Marot L, Tromme I. A digital dermoscopy follow-up illustration and a histopathologic correlation for angulated lines in extrafacial lentigo maligna. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pralong P, Bathelier E, Dalle S, Poulalhon N, Debarbieux S, Thomas L. Dermoscopy of lentigo maligna melanoma: report of 125 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167(2):280–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tiodorovic-Zivkovic D, Zalaudek I, Lallas A, Stratigos AJ, Piana S, Argenziano G. The importance of gray color as a dermoscopic clue in facial pigmented lesion evaluation: a case report. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2013;3(4):37–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tiodorovic-Zivkovic D, Argenziano G, Lallas A, Thomas L, Ignjatovic A, Rabinovitz H, et al. Age, gender, and topography influence the clinical and dermoscopic appearance of lentigo maligna. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(5):801–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tschandl P, Rosendahl C, Kittler H. Dermatoscopy of flat pigmented facial lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(1):120–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zalaudek I, Marghoob AA, Scope A, Leinweber B, Ferrara G, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, et al. Three roots of melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(10):1375–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jaimes N, Chen L, Dusza SW, Carrera C, Puig S, Thomas L, et al. Clinical and dermoscopic characteristics of desmoplastic melanomas. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(4):413–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cox NH, Aitchison TC, MacKie RM. Extrafacial lentigo maligna melanoma: analysis of 71 cases and comparison with lentigo maligna melanoma of the head and neck. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139(3):439–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lau YN, Affleck AG, Fleming CJ. Dermatoscopic features of extrafacial lentigo maligna. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2013;38(6):612–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sahin MT, Ozturkcan S, Ermertcan AT, Gunes AT. A comparison of dermoscopic features among lentigo senilis/initial seborrheic keratosis, seborrheic keratosis, lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma on the face. J Dermatol. 2004;31(11):884–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanaka M, Sawada M, Kobayashi K. Key points in dermoscopic differentiation between lentigo maligna and solar lentigo. J Dermatol. 2011;38(1):53–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kopf AW, Rabinovitz H, Marghoob A, Braun RP, Wang S, Oliviero M, et al. “Fat fingers”: a clue in the dermoscopic diagnosis of seborrheic keratoses. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55(6):1089–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bugatti L, Filosa G. Dermoscopy of lichen planus-like keratosis: a model of inflammatory regression. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007;21(10):1392–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zalaudek I, Ferrara G, Leinweber B, Mercogliano A, D’Ambrosio A, Argenziano G. Pitfalls in the clinical and dermoscopic diagnosis of pigmented actinic keratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53(6):1071–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nascimento MM, Shitara D, Enokihara MM, Yamada S, Pellacani G, Rezze GG. Inner gray halo, a novel dermoscopic feature for the diagnosis of pigmented actinic keratosis: clues for the differential diagnosis with lentigo maligna. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(4):708–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pock L, Drlik L, Hercogova J. Dermatoscopy of pigmented actinic keratosis--a striking similarity to lentigo maligna. Int J Dermatol. 2007;46(4):414–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Akay BN, Kocyigit P, Heper AO, Erdem C. Dermatoscopy of flat pigmented facial lesions: diagnostic challenge between pigmented actinic keratosis and lentigo maligna. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163(6):1212–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Guitera P, Moloney FJ, Menzies SW, Stretch JR, Quinn MJ, Hong A, et al. Improving management and patient care in lentigo maligna by mapping with in vivo confocal microscopy. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(6):692–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Robinson JK. Margin control for lentigo maligna. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;31(1):79–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Robinson JK. Use of digital epiluminescence microscopy to help define the edge of lentigo maligna. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140(9):1095–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen CS, Elias M, Busam K, Rajadhyaksha M, Marghoob AA. Multimodal in vivo optical imaging, including confocal microscopy, facilitates presurgical margin mapping for clinically complex lentigo maligna melanoma. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153(5):1031–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Guitera P, Haydu LE, Menzies SW, Scolyer RA, Hong A, Fogarty GB, et al. Surveillance for treatment failure of lentigo maligna with dermoscopy and in vivo confocal microscopy: new descriptors. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170(6):1305–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashfaq A. Marghoob MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marino, M.L., Carrera, C., Marchetti, M.A., Marghoob, A.A. (2017). Role of Dermoscopy. In: Nehal, K., Busam, K. (eds) Lentigo Maligna Melanoma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43787-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43787-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43785-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43787-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics