Abstract
The full range of benefits of implementing PREMIS only comes when the implementation is well considered and well executed. These benefits pertain both to the implementing organization and the digital preservation community. In order to support organizations, the PREMIS Conformance Statement defines what can be considered a well-executed implementation. This chapter focusses on the 2015 conformance statement, exploring the value of conformance and how best to achieve it. Finally, the chapter explores how conformance could be linked to assertions of best practice and certification.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
PREMIS Editorial Committee (2010) Conformance implementation of the PREMIS data dictionary, October 2010. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/premis-conformance-oct2010.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2016
PREMIS Editorial Committee (2015) Conformance implementation of the PREMIS data dictionary, April 2015. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/premis-conformance-20150429.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2016
OED Online (2014) “Conform, v.” Oxford University Press, June 2014. Accessed 13 July 2014
PREMIS (2010) http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/premis-conformance-oct2010.pdf, p 6
Jailani H, McKinney P (2012) Compliance conundrums: implementing PREMIS at two national libraries, IS&T archiving conference 2012 (ARCHIVING 2012), pp 244–249
Kool W, van der Werf T, Lavoie B (2014) Preservation health check: monitoring threats to digital repository content. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2014/oclcresearch-preservation-health-check-2014-a4.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2016
Kool W, van der Werf T, Lavoie B (2014) Preservation health check: monitoring threats to digital repository content. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research, p 13. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2014/oclcresearch-preservation-health-check-2014-a4.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2016
PREMIS Editorial Committee (2015) Conformance implementation of the PREMIS data dictionary, April 2015. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/premis-conformance-20150429.pdf. Accessed 8 Jan 2016
http://www.exlibrisgroup.com/category/RosettaOverview. Accessed 8 Jan 2016
http://preservica.com/. Accessed 8 Jan 2016
https://www.archivematica.org/en/. Accessed 8 Jan 2016
Eco U (2004) Mouse or rat?: translation as negotiation. Orion, London, p 2004
PREMIS Editorial Committee (2015) PREMIS data dictionary for preservation, version 3. p. 13. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/premis-3-0-final.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2016
Jailani H, McKinney P (2012) Compliance conundrums: implementing PREMIS at two national libraries, IS&T archiving conference 2012 (ARCHIVING 2012), p 248
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) (2011) Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories, recommended practice, issue 1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McKinney, P. (2016). Conformance with PREMIS. In: Dappert, A., Guenther, R., Peyrard, S. (eds) Digital Preservation Metadata for Practitioners. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43763-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43763-7_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43761-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43763-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)