Advertisement

Postscript

  • Simone SandholzEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

In April and May 2015, Kathmandu has been hit by devastating earthquakes with severe impacts, among others on Kathmandu and its heritage. Much of the historic fabric in the city centre is lost, not only in the World Heritage Sites like the Durbar Squares but also small shrines, statues and community temples in other quarters. The loss of buildings and temples has also impacted severely on the intangible urban heritage which is often directly linked with the damaged heritage sites. Kathmandu is now at a crossroads, between restoring its urban past—tangible and intangible one—and converting the city or parts of it into something new. While it is intended that destroyed parts of the World Heritage Sites will be reconstructed over time this is quite unlikely for other sites that may simply vanish. Here the earthquake may be rather seen as chance to modernize the city that surely had to face many challenges already before the earthquake, but without paying much attention to its past. Hopefully the growing understanding about the importance of intangible values and assets, of cultural heritage as expression of the society’s past, will be considered in the reconstruction process and not be left aside.

Keywords

Kathmandu Nepal Urban heritage Earthquake Reconstruction 

References

  1. Acharya KP, Pradhananga S (2015) Review of the integrated management plan of Kathmandu Valley World Heritage property. In: Weise K (ed) Revisiting Kathmandu. Safeguarding living urban heritage. International symposium Kathmandu Valley 25–29 November 2013. UNESCO, UNESCO Office in Kathmandu, Kathmandu, pp 127–132Google Scholar
  2. Bahadur Dimal S (2015) Restoring ICH in Nepal since the earthquakes of 2015. Intangible Cult Herit Courier Asia Pacific 25:8–9Google Scholar
  3. Bandarin F, Hosagrahar J, Sailer Albernaz F (2011) Why development needs culture. J Cult Herit Manag Sustain Dev 1(1):15–25. doi: 10.1108/20441261111129906 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bilham R (2015) Seismology: raising Kathmandu. Nat Geosci 8(8):582–584. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blake J (2015) How Nepal’s history may be its greatest strength after the earthquake. CNN. http://edition.cnn.com/2015/04/26/world/nepal-snapshot/index.html. Accessed 28 April 2015
  6. Bogaty T (2015) KMC mulling over urban regeneration targeting core areas of city. The Himalayan TimesGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiaro G, Kiyota T, Pokhrel RM, Goda K, Katagiri T, Sharma K (2015) Reconnaissance report on geotechnical and structural damage caused by the 2015 Gorkha Earthquake, Nepal. Soils Found 55(5):1030–1043. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.09.006
  8. Fahad Hossain ASM, Adhikari TL, Ansary MA, Bari QH (2015) Characteristics and consequence of Nepal earthquake 2015: a review. Geotech Eng J SEAGS AGSSEA 46(4):114–120Google Scholar
  9. Goda K, Kiyota T, Pokhrel RM, Chiaro G, Katagiri T, Sharma K, Wilkinson S (2016) The 2015 Gorkha Nepal earthquake: insights from earthquake damage survey. Front in Built Environ 1(8):1–15. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2015.00008 Google Scholar
  10. Hutt M (2015) Heritage, continuity, and Nostalgia American Anthropological Association. http://www.culanth.org/fieldsights/737-heritage-continuity-and-nostalgia Accessed 24 April 2016
  11. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (2014) World Disasters report 2014—focus on culture and risk. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Geneva. ISBN 978-92-9139-214-8Google Scholar
  12. Maskey PN (2015) Disaster risk of culture heritage sites of the Kathmandu Valley. In: Weise K (ed) Revisiting Kathmandu. Safeguarding Living Urban Heritage. International symposium Kathmandu Valley 25–29 November 2013. UNESCO, UNESCO Office in Kathmandu, Kathmandu, pp 283–290Google Scholar
  13. Muzzini E, Aparicio G (2013) Urban growth and spatial transition in Nepal: an initial assessment. Directions in Development. World Bank, Washington, DC. doi: 10.1596/978-0-8213-9659-9
  14. National Planning Commission (ed) (2015) Nepal earthquake 2015 post disaster needs assessment, vol A: Key Findings. Government of Nepal, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  15. Pavlova I, Makarigakis A, Depret T, Jomelli V (2015) Global overview of the geological hazard exposure and disaster risk awareness at world heritage sites. J Cult Herit. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.11.001
  16. Romão X, Paupério E, Menon A (2015) Traditional construction in high seismic zones: a losing battle? The case of the 2015 Nepal earthquake. In: Correia MR, Lourenco PB, Varum H (eds) Seismic Retrofitting: learning from vernacular architecture. CRC Press, Leiden, pp 93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rutherford N (2015) How to turn awareness into action on disaster preparedness. http://www.euractiv.com/sections/sustainable-dev/how-turn-awareness-action-disaster-preparedness-314413. Accessed 11 May 2015
  18. Shakya M, Varum H, Vicente R, Costa A (2014) Seismic vulnerability and loss assessment of the Nepalese Pagoda temples. Bull Earthq Eng 13(7):2197–2223. doi: 10.1007/s10518-014-9699-5
  19. Un OCHA (2015) Nepal flash appeal revision: Nepal earthquake April–September 2015. UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, UN Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator for Nepal, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  20. Watson I (2016) Resilience and disaster risk reduction: reclassifying diversity and national identity in post-earthquake Nepal. Third World Q 1–22. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2016.1159913

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of GeographyUniversity of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations