Abstract
This chapter explores how universities in Sweden have approached the challenges of inclusive development and social innovation. Whereas the higher education system has been quite successful in providing access to previously excluded groups, the concept of social innovation applied to solving social problems has not yet been integrated into the policies and practices of the university innovation system. The Third Mission of universities is generally interpreted as research and innovation aimed at developing and commercializing technical products rather than supporting more intangible and complex social innovation activities. The universities’ innovation systems for commercial innovations are well developed but organizationally and operationally disconnected from social innovation activities. At the core of this separation of social innovation activities from the work of technology transfer offices at universities is the tendency of regarding commercial innovation as organically separated from social innovation. Instead, a model should be adopted that acknowledges that although much of technological innovation is distinctly different in process, aim, and outcome compared to social innovation, there exists a considerable overlap between the two types of innovation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arocena, R., Göransson, B., & Sutz, J. (2015, May). Knowledge policies and universities in developing countries: Inclusive development and the “Developmental University”. In Technology in society (Vol. 41, pp. 10–20).
Bepa (2011). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union. Bureau of European Policy Advisers, European Commisssion.
Borzaga, C., & Bodini, R. (2012), “What to Make of Social Innovation? Towards a Framework for Policy Development”. European Research Institute on Cooperative & Social Enterprises (EURICSE) Working Paper No. 36/12.
Credit Suisse (2015). ‘Global Wealth Databook 2015’. Total net wealth at constant exchange rate (USD billion). Retrieved from http://publications.credit-suisse.com/tasks/render/file/index.cfm?fileid=C26E3824-E868-56E0-CCA04D4BB9B9ADD5.
De Mello, L., & Dutz, M. A. (Eds.). (2012). Promoting inclusive growth: Challenges and policies. OECD Publishing.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32, 109–121.
Fischer, J. (2015). Knowledge Compromise(d)? Ways and values of coproduction in academia. Doctoral dissertation, Lund University.
Gidlund, J., & Frankelius, P. (2003). Innovativa processer. SOU 2003:90. Stockholm.
Göransson, B., & Brundenius, C. (Eds.). (2011). Universities in transition: The changing role and challenges for academic institutions. New York: Springer.
Göransson, B., Maharajh, R., & Schmoch, U. (2009, March), Special issue on the third mission of universities. Science and Public Policy, 36(2).
Göransson, B., & Renault, T. (2015). Innovation for whom? Universities and social innovation for inclusive development in Sweden and Brazil. In Paper presented at the XIII Globelics Conference in Havana, Cuba, 23–25 September 2015.
Hall, J., Matos, S., Lorn Sheehan, L., & Silvestre, B. (2012, June). Entrepreneurship and innovation at the base of the pyramid: A recipe for inclusive growth or social exclusion? Journal of Management Studies, 49(4).
Hansson, J., Björk, F., Lundborg, D., & Olofsson, L.-E. (2014). An ecosystem for social innovation in Sweden. Lund University, MediaTryck
Heeks, R., Foster, C., & Nugroho, Y. (2014). New models of inclusive development for development. Innovation and Development, 4(2), 175–185.
Heiskala, R. (2007). Social innovations: Structural and power perspectives. In T. Hämäläinen & R. Heiskala (Eds.), Social innovations, institutional change, and economic performance: Making sense of structural adjustment processes in industrial sectors, regions and societies. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Högskolelagen. (1992). (University Law), Svensk författningssamling, 1992, p. 1434.
IDRC—International Development Research Centre. (2011). Innovating for development. International Development Research Centre.
Johnson, B., & Andersen, A. (2012). Learning, innovation and inclusive development: New perspectives on economic development strategy and development aid. Globelics Thematic Report. Retrieved June 10, 2014, from http://www.globelics.org/wpcontent/uploads/2012/11/GLOBELICS2012_1_Indhold_TRYKcopy.
Krücken, G., Meier, F., & Müller, A. (2009). Linkages to the civil society as ‘leisure time activities’? Experiences at a German University. Science and Public Policy, 36, 139–145.
Lindberg, M. (2013). Den nya innovationspolitikens inkluderande ambitioner. In C. Nahnfeldt & M. Lindberg (Eds.), Är det nå’n innovation?! Att nyttiggöra hum/sam-forskning (p. 35). Karlstad University Press.
Ministry of Education. (2009). En akademi i tiden—ökad frihet för universitet och högskolor. Prop. 2009/10:149.
Ministry of Education. (2012). Forskning och innovation. Proposition 2012/13:30.
Nordic Council. (2015). Social entrepreneurship and social innovation in the Nordic countries: Initiatives to promote social entrepreneurship and social innovation. TemaNord 2015:562.
OECD. (2005). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Oslo Manual, Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation data. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2011). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, “Innovation for Inclusive Growth: Conference Discussion Report”. OECD Publishing.
Oxfam. (2016, January). An economy for the 1%. How privilege and power in the economy drive extreme inequality and how this can be stopped. Oxfam briefing paper.
Pålsson, C. M., Göransson, B., & Brundenius, C. (2009). Vitalizing the Swedish University System: Implementation of the ‘Third Mission’. Science and Public Policy, 36(2), 145–150.
Phills, J., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. (2008, Fall). Rediscovering Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, pp. 34–43.
Piketty, T. (2013). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.
Pinchot, G. (1984). Who is the intrapreneur? In Intrapreneuring: Why you don’t have to leave the corporation to become an entrepreneur. New York: Harper & Row.
Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878–885.
Saad-Filho, A. (2010). From Washington consensus to inclusive growth: The continuing relevance of pro-poor policy alternatives. World Economic and Social Survey 2010.
SCB. (2013). Statistics Sweden, “Research and development in Sweden 2011”. UF 16 SM 1301 (in Swedish).
SCB. (2014). Statistics Sweden, “Expenditure for own R&D per sector”. Retrieved March 19, 2015, from http://www.scb.se/sv_/Hitta-statistik/Statistik-efter-amne/Utbildning-och-forskning/Forskning/Forskning-och-utveckling-i-Sverige---oversikt-internationella-jamforelser-mm/8719/8726/207858/.
SCB. (2016). Statistics Sweden, Registrerade studenter efter läsår och kön 1977/78–2014/15. Retrieved April 17, 2016, from http://www.scb.se/sv_/Hitta-statistik/Statistik-efter-amne/Utbildning-och-forskning/Hogskolevasende/Studenter-och-examinerade-i-hogskoleutbildning-pa-grundniva-och-avancerad-niva/74409/74416/Registrerade-studenter/76753/.
Singh, A., Jain-Chandra, S., & Mohommad, A. (2012). Inclusive growth, institutions, and the underground economy. International Monetary Fund Working Paper 12/47.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
UKÄ (2013). Swedish Higher Education Authority, “Allt fler kvinnor bland de anställda”. Statistisk analys, 2013-09-10/7
UKÄ. (2014). Swedish Higher Education Authority, Jämställdhet i högskolan efter autonomireformen. Rapport 2014:9
UKÄ. (2015a). Swedish Higher Education Authority, Higher education in Sweden, 2015 status report. Retrieved from http://www.uka.se/arkiv/rapporter/2015-06-17-higher-education-in-sweden---2015-status-report.html.
UKÄ. (2015b). Swedish Higher Education Authority, Forskande och undervisande personal ofta från hem med hög utbildningsnivå. Statistisk Analys, 2015-01-20/1.
WB, World Bank. (2012). A new local agenda: Democracy, inclusive development and environmental sustainability. The World Bank.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Göransson, B. (2017). Role of Universities for Inclusive Development and Social Innovation: Experiences from Sweden. In: Brundenius, C., Göransson, B., Carvalho de Mello, J. (eds) Universities, Inclusive Development and Social Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43700-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43700-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43698-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43700-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)