Advertisement

CONTROLO 2016 pp 105-115 | Cite as

Wormhole Approach to Control in Distributed Computing Has Direct Relation to Physics

  • Nicolás F. Lori
  • Victor Alves
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 402)

Abstract

The topic of Wormholes in distributed computing is about creating two different realms with different characteristics, the synchronous Wormholes and the asynchronous payload with the goal of using the wormholes to control the synchronism of the payload processes. We describe the characteristics of Wormholes in distributed computing, and relate them to issues in Physics, specifically, wormholes in general relativity and entanglement in quantum mechanics. The entanglement in quantum mechanics is about the existence of fixed relations between different physical systems as if they were still the same system. The entanglement is made evident by the occurrence of decoherence, which transform the multiple outcome possibilities of quantum systems into a single outcome “classical physics”-like objective reality. It is here presented the similarity between the decoherence process in quantum physics and the consensus problem in distributed computing. The approach to quantum mechanics used is quantum Darwinism, a Darwinian approach to decoherence where the environment controls the outcome of a measurement. It is here proposed that wormhole systems can be used to implement environment-based control of distributed computing systems.

Keywords

Wormholes Distributed quantum computing control Decoherence Environment-based invariance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Eduarda Gavino. The work has been supported by COMPETE: POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007043 and FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia) within the Project Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2013.

References

  1. 1.
    Veríssimo, P.E.: Travelling through wormholes: a new look at distributed systems models. ACM SIGACT News Distrib. Comput. Column 21 37(1), 66–81 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sakurai, J.J.: Modern Quantum Mechanics. Addison-Wesley (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zurek, W.H.: Probabilities from entanglement, Born’s rule p k =  k|2 from envariance. Phys. Rev. A 71, 052105 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zurek, W.H. Relative states and the environment: Einselection, envariance, quantum darwinism, and existential interpretation. arXiv: 0707.2832v1. (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zurek, W.H.: Quantum Darwinism. Nat. Phys. 5, 181–188 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wald, R.: General Relativity. Chicago University Press (1984)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sonner, J.: Holographic schwinger effect and the geometry of entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111(21), 211603–211607 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology: You can’t get entangled without a wormhole: Physicist finds entanglement instantly gives rise to a wormhole. ScienceDaily. 5 December. (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Einstein, A., Rosen, N.: The particle problem in the general theory of relativity. Phys. Rev. 48, 73–77 (1935)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fischer, M.J., Lynch, N.A., Paterson, M.S.: Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process. J. ACM 32(2), 374–382 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chandra, T., Toueg, S.: Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems. J. ACM 43(2), 225–267 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ekert, A., Knight, P.L.: Entangled quantum systems and the schmidt decomposition. Am. J. Phys. 65(5), 415–423 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hassan, M. Th., Luu, T.T., Moulet, A., Raskazovskaya, O., Zhokhov, P., Garg, Karpowicz, N., Zheltikov, A.M., Pervak, V., Krausz, F., Goulielmakis, E.: Optical attosecond pulses and tracking the nonlinear response of bound electrons. Nature 530, 66–70 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bourilkov, D.: Hint for axial-vector contact interactions in the data on e+e → e+e(γ) at center-of-mass energies 192–208 GeV. Phys. Rev. D 64, 071701R (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Algoritmi Centre, University of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations