Skip to main content

Ethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
From an Association to a Royal College

Abstract

The three decades covered by this history saw profound changes in public and professional attitudes to severe disability and ‘end-of-life’ decisions. The paternalistic attitude of an earlier generation was replaced by a welcome move to a more consensual approach, key to which was open discussion with parents, children and young patients. Neil McIntosh, a distinguished neonatologist and professor of child health and health in Edinburgh, leads much of this change, and the principles established in the report of the College working party he chaired withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment, criticised initially by the medical establishment, have been widely adopted in clinical practice. These form the basis of the present-day guidance, the evolution of which is reviewed by two great Ormond Street paediatricians, Vic Larcher and Joe Brierley.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

The Early Years

  1. Snow H. Opium and cocaine in the treatment of cancerous disease. Br Med J. 1896;ii:718–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McIntosh N, Eldridge C. Neonatal death – the neglected side of neonatal care? Arch Dis Child. 1984;59:585–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mitchell R. The child and experimental medicine. Br Med J. 1964;i:721–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. British Paediatric Association Working Party on Ethics of Research on Children. Guidelines to aid ethical committees considering research involving children. Arch Dis Child. 1980;55:75–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Report of the House of Lords Select Committee on Medical Ethics, House of Lords. 1994;1:47.

    Google Scholar 

  6. RCPCH Ethics Advisory Committee. Withholding and with drawing life-saving medical treatment. A framework for practice. RCPCH, London; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. RCPCH Ethics Advisory Committee. Withholding and withdrawing life sustaining medical treatment. A framework for practice. RCPCH, London;2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anonymous. ‘Points of View’. Non-treatment of defective newborn babies. Lancet. 1979;314:1123–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brereton RJ. Severe handicap in the newborn: treatment, non-treatment or assisted death. Lancet. 1979;314:1372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Silverman WA. Compassion or opportunism. Pediatrics. 2004;113:402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Balfour-Lynn IM, Tasker RC. Futility and death in paediatric medical intensive care. J Med Ethics. 1996;22:279–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. BMA Ethics Committee. Withholding and withdrawing life prolonging medical treatment. Guidance for decision making. BMA publications. RCPCH, London; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

The Post-1997 Era

  1. RCPCH Ethics Advisory Committee. Withholding and withdrawing life-saving medical treatment. A framework for practice. RCPCH, London; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. RCPCH. Ethics advisory committee and professor David Hull guidelines for the ethical conduct of medical research involving children. Arch Dis Child. 2000;82:177–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Commercial sponsorship in the RCPCH, Report of a Working Party 1999 (Chair: Professor David Harvey) (http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/sites/default/files/asset_library/Publications/C/Commercial%20Sponsorship%20in%20the%20Royal%20College%20of%20Paediatrics%20and%20Child%20Health.pdf).

  4. RCPCH sponsorship framework of 2015(ratified by RCPCH Council April 2015). RCPCH/07/15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. RCPCH Ethics Advisory Committee. Advice to paediatricians and other professionals in responses to media requests for contact with and/or enquiries about children; A guidance note RCPCH. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Larcher V, Elias-Jones A, Mepani B, Brierley J. “This House believes that we have gone too far in granting young people the responsibility for making decisions about their own health care”. A record of a debate held in the Ethics and Law session of the RCPCH Annual Meeting York 2009. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96:123–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. RCPCH Responsibilities of doctors in child protection with regard to confidentiality. RCPCH, London; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations. 2004. www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/si/si2004/20041031.htm. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/.

  9. Modi N, Vohra J, Preston J, Elliott C, Van’t Hoff W, Coad J, Gibson F, Partridge L, Brierley J, Larcher V, Greenough A, Working Party of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Guidance on clinical research involving infants, children and young people: an update for researchers and research ethics committees. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99:887–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Children and clinical research: ethical issues Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2015. ISBN 978-1-904384-31-1http://nuffieldbioethics.org/wp-content/uploads/Children-and-clinical-research-full-report.pdf.

  11. Larcher V, Craig F, Bhogal K, Wilkinson D, Brierley J. Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100 Suppl 2:s1–26. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2014-306666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Neil McIntosh or Joe Brierley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McIntosh, N., Larcher, V., Brierley, J. (2017). Ethics. In: Craft, A., Dodd, K. (eds) From an Association to a Royal College. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43582-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43582-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43581-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43582-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics