Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility and Farm Animal Welfare: Towards Sustainable Development in the Food Industry?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Stages of Corporate Social Responsibility

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

In recent years, CSR has grown in importance as supermarkets and corporate retailers have responded to consumer concerns over the growing prominence of a range of issues linked to environmental sustainability and farm animal welfare (FAW). Improvements in FAW can be aligned closely with the three pillars of sustainable development—social, economic and environmental sustainability. Animal agriculture has a significant impact on climate change and is in direct competition with humans for water, food, space and other scarce resources. Factory farming also spreads pathogens, with the potential to increase infectious diseases, and also significantly underlines livelihoods in rural communities. Corporate retailers are now seen to be socially and ethically accountable to both their immediate stakeholders and wider society, and it is this situation that has brought about the increased use of CSR as a means of promoting their efforts in this area.

As well as making significant improvements on the social and environmental issues, there is great potential for better FAW to improve business performance by increasing efficiencies of production, sustainable procurement and consumption practices, whilst enhancing food safety. In is in this context that the Business Benchmark for Farm Animal Welfare (BBFAW) has emerged to examine how companies work to improve FAW. The benchmark evaluates the performance of supermarkets and corporate retailers in this area by examining a range of CSR related publicity materials. This chapter draws on research from a number of recent EU projects on FAW to assess how, if and in what ways the BBFAW helps supermarkets and corporate retailers to further sustainable development through CSR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akhtar, A. (2012). Animals and public health: Why treating animals better is critical to human welfare. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amos, N., & Sullivan, R. (2011). Farm animal welfare as an investment issue. Investor Briefing 4, BBFAW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amos, N., & Sullivan, R. (2012). Farm animal welfare as an investment issue, investor briefing No. 4. UK: Business Benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amos, N., & Sullivan, R. (2013). The business benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare 2012 report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amos, N., & Sullivan, R. (2014). The business benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare 2013 report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amos, N., & Sullivan, R. (2015). The business benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare 2014 report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinnes, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2003). What will consumers pay for social product features? Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, B. D. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Definition, core issues, and recent developments. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (1995). The value of farm animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 46, 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (1996). People’s willingness to pay for farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 5, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blokhuis, H. J., Miele, M., Veissier, I., & Jones, B. (Eds.). (2013). Improving farm animal welfare: Science and society working together: The Welfare Quality approach. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnett, M. (2002). Education for sustainability as a frame of mind. Environmental Education Research, 8(1), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brambell, R. (1965, December). Technical committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems (the Brambell report). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. (2001). Eradicating hunger: A growing challenge; State of the World 2001 (pp. 43–62). Washington, DC: The WorldWatch Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, H. (2010). The marketing and communication of animal welfare: A review of existing tools, strategies and practice. The European Animal Welfare Platform (EAWP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, H., & Roe, E. J. (2012). Commodifying animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 21(supplement 1), 131–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L., Thiagarajan, D., Hatanaka, M., Bain, C., Flores, L. G., & Frahm, M. (2005). The relationship of third-party certification (TPC) to sanitary/phytosanitary (SPS) measures and the international agri-food trade (Final report).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business Society, 38, 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. (2011 [1962]). Silent spring. Ringwood: Penguin Modern Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creyer, E. H., & Ross, W. T. (1996). The impact of corporate behavior on perceived product value. Marketing Letters, 7, 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EGfA. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and animal welfare. Brussels: EuroGroup for Animals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, S. D., & Dauvergne, P. (2015). Farming for Walmart: The politics of corporate control and responsibility in the global South. The Journal of Peasant Studies. doi:10.1080/03066150.2015.1043275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emel, J., & Neo, H. (Eds.). (2015). Political ecologies of meat (Routledge studies in political ecology). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2005). Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals (Eurobarometer special report 229). European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2007). Attitudes of EU citizen towards animal welfare: Special Eurobarometer 270. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A., & Miele, M. (2008). Consumers’ views about Farm Animal Welfare; Part II: European comparative report based on focus group research (Welfare Quality report No 5). http://www.welfarequality.net

  • Evans, A. B., & Miele, M. (2012). Between food and flesh: How animals are made to matter (or not to matter) within food consumption practices. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 30(2), 298–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, T., & Vorely, B. (2004). Stakeholder accountability in the UK supermarket sector (Final report of the ‘Race to the Top’ project: Tracking supermarket progress towards a fairer and greener food system). International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare, UFAW Animal Welfare. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidberg, S. (2004). The ethical complex of corporate food power. Environment and Planning D—Society and Space, 22(4), 513–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13, 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frooman, J. (1997). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta-analysis of event studies. Business and Society, 36, 221–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavinelli, A., Rhein, C., & Ferrara, M. (2007). European policies on animal welfare and their effects on global trade. Farm Policy Journal, 4, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouveia, L., & Juska, A. (2002). Taming nature, taming workers: Constructing the separation between meat consumption and meat production in the U.S. Sociologia Ruralis, 42(4), 370–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, R. (2015). Meat and inequality: Environmental health consequences of livestock agribusiness. In J. Emel & H. Neo (Eds.), Political ecologies of meat (Routledge studies in political ecology). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwilliam, N., & Voisine. N. (2012). Towards Sustainable Animal Rearing: The implications for global food companies. Vigeo Rating: Sustainability Focus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, G., & Henson, S. (2001). Consumer concerns about animal welfare and the impact on food choice. EU FAIR CT98-3678, Centre for Food Economics Research, The University of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, G. C., & Makatouni, A. (2002). Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare. British Food Journal, 104(3/4/5), 287–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. (1964). Animal machines. London: Vincent Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in the food sector. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 38(3), 297–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, C. (2015). Farm gone factory: Industrial animal agriculture, animal welfare, and the environment. In L. Kemmerer (Ed.), Animals and the environment: Advocacy, activism, and the quest for common ground. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, L. (2009). Filling the Ark: Animal welfare in disasters. Philadelphia, PA: Templeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2015). The political science of farm animal welfare in the US and EU. In J. Emel & H. Neo (Eds.), Political ecologies of meat (Routledge studies in political ecology). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmerer, L. (2015). Eating ecosystems. In L. Kemmerer (Ed.), Animals and the environment: Advocacy, activism, and the quest for common ground. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjærnes, U., Bock, B., & Miele, M. (2009). Improving farm animal welfare across Europe: Current initiatives and venues for future strategies. In U. Kjarnes, B. Bock, M. Higgin, & J. Roex (Eds.), Farm animal welfare within the supply chain: Regulation, agriculture and geography (Welfare Quality reports series no. 8, pp. 1–69). Cardiff: Cardiff University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjærnes, U., Harvey, M., & Warde, A. (2007). Trust in food: A comparative and institutional analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kjaernes, U., & Lavik, R. (2008). Opinions on animal welfare and food consumption in seven European Countries (Welfare Quality® report series). Cardiff: Cardiff University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopina, H., & Blewitt, J. (2015). Sustainable business: Key issues (Key issues in environment and sustainability). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T. (1997). Going public: Food campaigns during the 1980s and early 1990s. In D. F. Smith (Ed.), Nutrition in Britain: Science, scientists and politics in the twentieth century. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, F. (2012). Workers who collected freedom food chickens ‘were trafficked and beaten’. The Guardian, Monday, October 29: accessed December 2, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. M., Park, S. Y., Rapert, M. I., & Newman, C. L. (2011). Does perceived consumer fit matter in corporate social responsibility issues? Journal of Business Research, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.02.040.

  • Lever, J., & Evans, A. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: Making slaughter visible? Presented at HSA International Symposium, 16–17th July, 2015, Zagreb, Croatia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lever, J., Milbourne, P. (2015). The structural invisibility of outsiders: The role of migrant labour in the meat-processing industry. Sociology. Published on-line first, December 23, 2015, 1–17: DOI: 10.1177/0038038515616354.

  • Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30, 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloni, M. J., & Brown, M. E. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: An application in the food industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? An analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance (Working Paper). Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield, L. E., Bennett, R. M., Tranter, R. B., & Wooldridge, M. J. (2007). Consumption of welfare-friendly food products in Great Britain, Italy and Sweden, and how it may be influenced by consumer attitudes to, and behaviour towards, animal welfare attributes. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 15(3), 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, J. (2007). Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 9(3), 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miele, M. (2011). The taste of happiness: Free-range chicken. Environment and Planning A, 43(9), 2076–2090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miele, M., & Evans, A. (2010). When foods become animals: Ruminations on ethics and responsibility in care-full practices of consumption. Ethics, Place and Environment: A Journal of Philosophy and Geography, 13(2), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miele, M., & Lever, J. (2013). Civilizing the market for welfare friendly products in Europe? The techno-ethics of the Welfare Quality Assessment. Geoforum, 48, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miele, M., & Lever, J. (2014). Improving animal welfare in Europe: Cases of comparative bio-sustainabilities. In T. Marsden & A. Morely (Eds.), Sustainable food systems: Building a new paradigm. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miele, M., Murdoch, J., & Roe, R. (2005). Animals and ambivalence: Governing Farm Animal Welfare in the European food sector. In V. Higgins & G. Lawrence (Eds.), Agricultural governance: Globalization and the new politics of regulation (pp. 169–185). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miele, M., Blokhuis, H., Bennett, R., & Bock, B. (2013). Changes in farming and in stakeholder concern for animal welfare. In H. Blokhuis et al. (Eds.), Improving farm animal welfare: Science and society working together: The welfare quality approach. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K., & Sonnino, R. (2008). The school food revolution: Public food and the challenge of sustainable development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padel, S., & Foster, C. (2005). Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour: Understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food. British Food Journal, 107(8), 606–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D. K. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business and Society, 43, 296–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Commission. (2008). Putting meat on the table: Industrial farm animal production in America (A report of the Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter. M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, E. (2007). The rise of agricultural animal welfare standards as understood through a neo-institutional lens. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 15(3), 26–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, E., & Murdoch, J. (2006). UK market for animal welfare friendly products. Market structure, survey of available products and quality assurance schemes Cardiff, UK (Welfare Quality report).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe, E. J., Murdoch, J., & Marsden, T. (2005). The retail of welfare-friendly products: A comparative assessment of the nature of the market for welfare-friendly products in six European Countries. In Science and society improving animal welfare. Welfare Quality Conference: Science and society improving animal welfare, Welfare Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roex, J., & Miele, M. (2005). Farm animal welfare concerns. Consumers, retailers and producers (Welfare Quality reports No. 1). Cardiff: Cardiff University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow—Environmental issues and options. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swabe, J. (1999). Animals, disease, and human society: Human-animal relations and the rise of veterinary medicine. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Utting, P., & Marques, J. C. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and regulatory governance: Towards inclusive development? New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E., & Tuyttens, F. A. (2007). Segmentation based on consumers’ perceived importance and attitude toward farm animal welfare. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 15(3), 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W. (2011). The age of responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the new DNA of business. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, T. (2013). The Ecological Hoofprint. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK

    John Lever

  2. Coventry University, Coventry, UK

    Adrian Evans

Authors
  1. John Lever
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adrian Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Lever .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. London Guildhall Faculty Business & Law, London Metropolitan University, London, United Kingdom

    Samuel O. Idowu

  2. School of Applied Social Studies, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom

    Stephen Vertigans

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lever, J., Evans, A. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Farm Animal Welfare: Towards Sustainable Development in the Food Industry?. In: Idowu, S., Vertigans, S. (eds) Stages of Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43536-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation