Abstract
To bring drugs formulated in drug delivery systems (DDS) successfully into the clinic, preclinical studies have to be conducted which are aimed at obtaining pharmacological data relevant to the clinical application of such drugs. For such preclinical studies high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is generally used. However, these methods do not generate data about the drug distribution in a specific target area, although obtained data allow optimizing the drug design in order to achieve a more efficient targeted delivery.
Microscopic mass spectrometry (MMS), in which a microscope is coupled to an atmospheric pressure matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) and quadruple ion trap time-of-flight (TOF) analyzer has been developed for the investigation of the distribution of molecules such as small peptide metabolites and low-molecular weight drugs. The matrix-coated drug sample is ionized and then separated based on its mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). Images are acquired from imaging mass spectrometry or tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data, respectively.
Here we introduce a drug imaging system with enhanced resolution and sensitivity which is based on using MMS. In our analysis, MS and MS/MS were used for quantification and validation, respectively. Our short review describes how the use of MMS allows the analysis of the precise distribution of a DDS drug complex including both, active and passive targeting systems. Notably, we successfully visualized and quantified the distribution of a non-radiolabeled and non-chemically modified drug in various frozen tissue slices microscopically.
In conclusion, MMS may provide a new strategy for facilitating the design of DDS with incorporated low-molecular weight drugs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- DDS:
-
Drug delivery system
- MALDI:
-
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization
- MMS:
-
Microscopic mass spectrometry
- EPR:
-
Enhanced permeability and retention
- RES:
-
Reticuloendothelial system
- ADC:
-
Antibody drug conjugate
- ACA:
-
Anticancer agent
- MMAE:
-
Monomethyl auristatin E
- PTX:
-
Paclitaxel
- CHCA:
-
α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid
- DHB:
-
2,5-Dihydroxybenzoic acid
References
Castellino S, Groseclose MR, Wagner D (2011) MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: bridging biology and chemistry in drug development. Bioanalysis 3:2427–2441
Cornett DS, Reyzer ML, Chaurand P et al (2007) MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: molecular snapshots of biochemical systems. Nat Methods 4:828–833
Flossel C, Luther T, Muller M et al (1994) Immunohistochemical detection of tissue factor (TF) on paraffin sections of routinely fixed human tissue. Histochemistry 101:449–453
Fujiwara Y, Furuta M, Manabe S et al (2016) Imaging mass spectrometry for the precise design of antibody-drug conjugates. Sci Rep 6:24954
Garrett MD, Workman P (1999) Discovering novel chemotherapeutic drugs for the third millennium. Eur J Cancer 35:2010–2030
Hamaguchi T, Matsumura Y, Suzuki M et al (2005) NK105, a paclitaxel-incorporating micellar nanoparticle formulation, can extend in vivo antitumour activity and reduce the neurotoxicity of paclitaxel. Br J Cancer 92:1240–1246
Hamaguchi T, Kato K, Yasui H et al (2007) A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of NK105, a paclitaxel-incorporating micellar nanoparticle formulation. Br J Cancer 97:170–176
Hellstrom KE, Hellstrom I, Brown JP (2013) Human tumor-associated antigens identified by monoclonal antibodies. Springer Semin Immunopathol 5:127–146
Junutula JR, Raab H, Clark S et al (2008) Site-specific conjugation of a cytotoxic drug to an antibody improves the therapeutic index. Nat Biotechnol 26:925–932
Kataoka K, Kwon GS, Yokoyama M et al (1993) Block copolymer micelles as vehicles for drug delivery. J Control Release 24:119–132
Kato K, Chin K, Yoshikawa K et al (2012) Phase II study of NK105, a paclitaxel-incorporating micellar nanoparticle, for previously treated advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Investig New Drugs 30:1621–1627
Khorana AA, Ahrendt SA, Ryan CK et al (2007) Tissue factor expression, angiogenesis, and thrombosis in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13:2870–2875
Kim M, Gillies RJ, Rejniak KA (2013) Current advances in mathematical modeling of anti-cancer drug penetration into tumor tissues. Front oncol 3:278
Koga Y, Manabe S, Aihara Y et al (2015) Antitumor effect of anti-tissue factor antibody-MMAE conjugate in human pancreatic tumor xenografts. Int J Cancer 137:1257–1466
Lorenz M, Ovchinnikova OS, Kertesz V et al (2013) Laser microdissection and atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry coupled for multimodal imaging. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 27:1429–1436
Mackman N (2009) The many faces of tissue factor. J Thromb Haemost 7:136–139
Maeda H, Wu J, Sawa T et al (2000) Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. J Control Release 65:271–284
Matsumura Y (2012) Cancer stromal targeting (CAST) therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:710–719
Matsumura Y (2014) The drug discovery by NanoMedicine and its clinical experience. Jpn J Clin Oncol 44:515–525
Matsumura Y, Kataoka K (2009) Preclinical and clinical studies of anticancer agent-incorporating polymer micelles. Cancer Sci 100:572–579
Matsumura Y, Maeda H (1986) A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res 46:6387–6392
Minchinton AI, Tannock IF (2006) Drug penetration in solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer 6:583–592
Nitori N, Ino Y, Nakanishi Y et al (2005) Prognostic significance of tissue factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 11:2531–2539
Römpp A, Spengler B (2013) Mass spectrometry imaging with high resolution in mass and space. Histochem Cell Biol 139:759–783
Rowinsky EK, Chaudhry V, Forastiere AA et al (1993) Phase I and pharmacologic study of paclitaxel and cisplatin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: neuromuscular toxicity is dose-limiting. J Clin Oncol 11:2010–2020
Saito Y, Waki M, Hameed S et al (2011) Development of imaging mass spectrometry. Biol Pharm Bull 35:1417–1424
Sanderson RJ, Hering MA, James SF et al (2005) In vivo drug-linker stability of an anti-CD30 dipeptide-linked auristatin immunoconjugate. Clin Cancer Res 11:843–852
Schwamborn K, Caprioli RM (2010) Molecular imaging by mass spectrometry – looking beyond classical histology. Nat Rev Cancer 10:639–646
Sievers EL, Senter PD (2013) Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy. Annu Rev Med 64:15–29
Solon EG (2012) Use of radioactive compounds and autoradiography to determine drug tissue distribution. Chem Res Toxicol 25:543–555
van den Berg YW, Osanto S, Reitsma PH et al (2012) The relationship between tissue factor and cancer progression: insights from bench and bedside. Blood 119:924–932
Xie H, Audette C, Hoffee M et al (2004) Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of the antitumor immunoconjugate, cantuzumab mertansine (huC242-DM1), and its two components in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 308:1073–1082
Yasunaga M, Furuta M, Ogata K et al (2013) The significance of microscopic mass spectrometry with high resolution in the visualisation of drug distribution. Sci Rep 3:3050
Yokoyama M, Miyauchi M, Yamada N et al (1990) Polymer micelles as novel drug carrier: adriamycin-conjugted poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(aspartic acid) block copolymer. J Control Release 11:269–278
Yokoyama M, Okano T, Sakurai Y et al (1991) Toxicity and antitumor activity against solid tumors of micelle-forming polymeric anticancer drug and its extremely long circulation in blood. Cancer Res 51:3229–3236
Zolot RS, Basu S, Million RP (2013) Antibody-drug conjugates. Nat Rev Drug Discov 12:259–260
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matsumura, Y., Yasunaga, M. (2016). Microscopic Mass Spectrometry for the Precise Design of Drug Delivery Systems. In: Prokop, A., Weissig, V. (eds) Intracellular Delivery III. Fundamental Biomedical Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43525-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43525-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43523-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43525-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)