Abstract
The technology acceptance model (TAM) is practically explaining behavioral intention (BI). However, extensions are needed to further examine BI toward mobile commerce (m-commerce) acceptance due to the insufficient power of just two constructs perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) to explain BI. Therefore, limitations of TAM lead this research to extended TAM in two ways. First, facilitating conditions (FC) factor is not considered in TAM. In fact, Davis assumed that everyone is in control of the resources regarding adopting a new system. Second, cost is one of the obstacles in adopting m-commerce. High cost can decrease the acceptance rate of m-commerce. M-commerce services involve fees (connections fees, subscription fees, or roaming fees). TAM does not explain cost factor, because TAM was applied mostly in an organizational context that does not involve cost by the end-users in workplace. This research intends to address the above limitations by augmenting facilitating conditions and cost.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AbuShanab, E., Pearson, J. M., & Setterstrom, A. J. (2010). Internet banking and customers’ acceptance in Jordan: The unified model’s perspective. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 26(1), 23.
Almutairi, H. (2007). Is the “technology acceptance model” universally applicable? The case of the Kuwaiti Ministries. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 10(2), 57–80.
Bandyopadhyay, K., & Fraccastoro, K. A. (2007). The effect of culture on user acceptance of information technology. Communications of AIS, 2007(19), 522–543.
Crabbe, M., Standing, C., Standing, S., & Karjaluoto, H. (2009). An adoption model for mobile banking in Ghana. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 7(5), 515–543.
Dutta, S., & Mia, I. (2009). The Global Information Technology Report 2008–2009, Mobility in a Networked World, Technical report of the World Economic Forum & INSEAD, Published by World Economic Forum under ISBN-13:978-92-95044-19-7.
Gu, J.-C., Lee, S.-C., & Suh, Y.-H. (2009). Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11605–11616.
Kuo, Y.-F., & Yen, S.-N. (2009). Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use 3G mobile value-added services. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 103–110.
Lu, J., Liu, C., Yu, C. S., & Wang, K. (2008). Determinants of accepting wireless mobile data services in China. Information & Management, 45(1), 52–64.
Lu, J., Yu, C. S., Liu, C., & Yao, J. E. (2003). Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet. Internet Research, 13(3), 206–222.
Raleting, T., & Nel, J. (2011). Determinants of low-income non-users’ attitude towards WIG mobile phone banking: Evidence from South Africa. African Journal of Business Management, 5(1), 212–223.
Ramayah, T., Rouibah, K., Gopi, M., & Rangel, G. J. (2009). A decomposed theory of reasoned action to explain intention to use internet stock trading among Malaysian investors. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1222–1230.
Saeed, K. (2011). Understanding the adoption of mobile banking services: An empirical assessment. Paper presented at the AMCIS 2011 Proceedings—All Submissions, Detroit, Michigan.
Shin, D. H. (2011). The influence of perceived characteristics of innovating on 4G mobile adoption. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 9(3), 261–279.
The-Jordan-Times. (2009). Internet users reach 28 per cent in first three quarters. Retrieved February 7, 2010, from http://www.jordantimes.com/?news=21795&searchFor=mobile%20phones
Van Biljon, J., & Kotzé, P. (2008). Cultural factors in a mobile phone adoption and usage model. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 14(16), 2650–2679.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Maruping, L. M., & Bala, H. (2008). Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: The competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 483–502.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Wei, T. T., Marthandan, G., Chong, A. Y. L., Ooi, K. B., & Arumugam, S. (2009). What drives Malaysian m-commerce adoption? An empirical analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(3), 370–388.
Wu, J.-H., & Wang, S.-C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(5), 719–729.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Alnajjar, G. (2017). Facilitating Conditions and Cost in Determining M-Commerce Acceptance in Jordan: Initial Findings. In: Benlamri, R., Sparer, M. (eds) Leadership, Innovation and Entrepreneurship as Driving Forces of the Global Economy. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43434-6_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43434-6_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43433-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43434-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)