Abstract
One of the most relevant effects of bioethics emergence has been the spread of deliberative bodies on bioethics matters. Their features are very wide, depending upon the entity that creates them, their regional scope, the issues they deal with, the ruling strength of their agreements, etc. Among them, international bioethics committees are particularly relevant due to the huge impact of their work on global public opinion, as well as on the policies approved by governments all around the world. These bodies are presumed to adopt their decisions, as well as the other bioethics committees, after deliberating on facts and values (Gracia 2001).
I want to thank Laurence Lwoff, Head of the Bioethics Unit Secretary of the Committee on Bioethics (DH-BIO), for the information provided about the DH-BIO.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andorno, Roberto. 2007. Global bioethics at UNESCO: In defense of the universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. Journal of Medical Ethics 33(3): 150–154.
Andorno, Roberto. 2009. Human dignity and human rights as a common ground for a global bioethics. Journal of Philosophy and Medicine 34(3): 223–240. doi:10.1093/jmp/jhp023.
Aparisi, Angela. 2005. The globalization of bioethics: The tasks of international commissions. Georgetown Journal of International Law 37(1): 141–151.
Bellver, Vicente. 2006. Por una bioética razonable. Medios de comunicación, comités de ética y Derecho. Comares: Granada.
Christian, Byk, and Gérard Mémeteau. 1996. Le droit des comités d’éthique. Paris: Lacassaigne-ESKA.
CIOMS Executive Resolution. 2013. http://www.cioms.ch/index.php/12-newsflash/232-cioms-working-group-of-the-revision-of-the-2002-cioms-ethical-guidelines-for-biomedical-research. Accessed on 18 May 2014
Commission Decision. 2010. Commission decision of December 23rd, 2009, on the renewal of the mandate of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies (2010/1/EU). Official Journal of the European Union, 5.1.2010, L 1/8–9.
Council of Europe. 1949. Statute of the council of Europe. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/001.htm. Accessed on 22 May 2014.
Council of Europe. 2011. Resolution CM/Res (2011) 24 on intergovernmental committees and subordinate bodies, their terms of reference and working methods (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers, on 9th November 2011, at the 1125th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies).
Decision of the President of the European Commission. 2011. Decision of the President of the European commission of 10th Jan 2011, for the appointment of the European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies members for their fourth mandate (2011/C 12/04). Official Journal of the European Union, 15.1.2011, C 12/9.
DH-BIO. 2013. Terms of reference, committee of bioethics (DH-BIO) of the Council of Europe. DH-BIO/INF (2013) 3.
EGE Rules of Procedure 2011. Rules of Procedure of the European Group on Ethics (EGE) 2011–2016. http://ec.europa.eu/archives/bepa/european-group-ethics/docs/rules_of_procedure_en.pdf. Accessed on 14 May 2014.
Gracia, Diego. 2001. La deliberación moral. BoletÃn de la Academia Chilena de Medicina XXXVIII: 29–45.
IBC. 1998. Statutes of the International Committee on Bioethics of the UNESCO. Adopted by the Executive Board at its 154th Session, on 7th May 1998 (154 EX/Dec. 8.4).
IBC. 2001. Rules of Procedure of the International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO (IBC). SHS-503/01/CIB-8/4. Paris, Nov 23rd, 2001. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/bioethics/international-bioethics-committee/. Accessed on 15 May 2014.
Kutukdjian, G.B. 1994. UNESCO international bioethics committee. The Hastings Center Report 24(2): 3–4.
Landman, Willem A., and Udo Schuklenk. 2005. UNESCO ‘declares’ universals on bioethics and human rights – Many unexpected universal truths unearthed by UN body. Developing World Bioethics 5(2): iii–iv.
Le Bris, Sonia, Maria Bartha Knoppers, and Lori Luther. 1997. International bioethics, human genetics, and normativity. Houston Law Review 33: 1363–1396.
Macklin, Ruth. 2003. Dignity is a useless concept. BMJ 327: 1419–1420. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7429.1419.
Millum, Joseph, David Wendler, and Ezekiel J. Emanuel. 2013. The 50th anniversary of the declaration of Helsinki. Progress, but many remaining challenges. JAMA 310(20): 2143–2144. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281632.
Oviedo Convention. 1997. Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: Convention on human rights and biomedicine, Oviedo 1.4.1997, http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/164.htm. Accessed on 15th May 2014.
Parsa-Parsi, Ramin, Jeff Blackmer, Hans-Jörg Ehni, Torunn Janbu, Otmar Kloiber, and Urban Wiesing. 2013. Reconsidering the declaration of Helsinki. The Lancet 382(9900): 1246–1247. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62094-2.
Romeo Casabona, C. 2002. El Convenio Europeo sobre Derechos Humanos y Biomedicina: sus caracterÃsticas y sus repercusiones en el Derecho español. In El Convenio Europeo sobre Derechos Humanos y Biomedicina. Su entrada en vigor en el ordenamiento jurÃdico español, ed. C. Romeo Casabona, 1–18. Granada: Chair on Law and Human Genome Comares, Bilbao.
Romeo Casabona, C. 2014. La construcción del Derecho aplicable a la genética y a la biotecnologÃa humana a lo largo de las dos últimas décadas. Revista de Derecho y Genoma Humano. Extraordinary edition: 27–52.
Roscam Abbing, H. 1998. The convention on human rights and biomedicine: An appraisal of the council of Europe convention. The European Journal of Health Law 5(4): 377–387.
Salako, Solomon E. 2008. Informed consent under the European convention on biomedicine and the UNESCO declaration on bioethics. Medicine and Law 30(1): 101–113.
WHO. 2010. Global network of WHO collaborating centers for bioethics. Terms of reference. Adopted on Wednesday 26 May 2010, http://www.who.int/ethics/partnerships/global_network/en/. Accessed on 1 June 2014.
WHO. 2011. Standards and operational guidance for ethics review of health-related research with human participants, http://www.who.int/ethics/publications/research_standards_9789241502948/en/. Accessed on 1 June 2014.
Williams, John R. 2004. The promise and limits of international bioethics: Lessons from the recent revision of the declaration of Helsinki. Journal International de Bioéthique 15: 31–42. doi:10.3917/jib.151.0031.
Williams, John R. 2005. The ethics activities of the world medical association. Science and Engineering Ethics 11: 7–12.
Yesley, M. 2005. What’s in a name? The Hastings Center Report 35(2): 8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bellver, V. (2016). International Bioethics Committees: Conditions for a Good Deliberation. In: Serna, P., Seoane, JA. (eds) Bioethical Decision Making and Argumentation. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 70. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43419-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43419-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43417-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43419-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)