Values and Bioethics
Human beings are only morally responsible for their planned actions. Deliberation is the process that they have to carry out in order to mature their projects and make sound, reasonable, responsible and prudent decisions. And because all human projects include three aspects, the cognitive, the emotional and the operational or practical, deliberation will also proceed in three steps. First of all we must discuss the facts, reducing uncertainty in this regard, within reasonable limits. We then have to identify the values that are at stake, and the value conflicts that thus arise. And finally, it will be necessary, once a conflict of value has been selected from those that have been identified, to make explicit not only the extreme courses of action but also the intermediate courses, in order to choose from among them the optimal one, which will always be the one that to the greatest extent promotes, or to the least extent harms the values at stake.
KeywordsHuman Mind Human Species Moral Decision Monetary Unit Scientific Fact
- Aristotle. 1831. Aristotelis Opera. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
- Beauchamp, Tom, and James Childress. 1979. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dickens, Charles. 1854. Hard times. The Guttenberg project (http://www.gutenberg.org/files/786/786-h/786-h.htm).
- Gracia, Diego. 2010. Philosophy: Ancient and contemporary approaches. In Methods in medical ethics, 2nd ed, ed. Jeremy Sugarman and Daniel P. Sulmasy, 55–71. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
- Gracia, Diego. 2011a. Deliberation and consensus. In The SAGE handbook of health care ethics, ed. Ruth Chadwick, Henk ten Have, and Eric M. Meslin, 84–89. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Gracia, Diego. 2011b. Teoría y práctica de la deliberación moral. In Bioética: El estado de la cuestión, ed. Lydia Feito, Diego Gracia, and Miguel Sánchez, 101–154. Madrid: Triacastela.Google Scholar
- Jonsen, Albert R., and Stephen E. Toulmin. 1988. The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. San Francisco: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Kant, Immanuel. 1968. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Akademie-Ausgabe Kant Werke IV. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Moore, G.E. 1994. Principia ethica, Revisedth ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Noddings, N. 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Potter, Van Rensselaer. 1971. Bioethics: Bridge to the future. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar