Abstract
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) administers numerous programs that contribute toward global soil security, many of which are under the umbrella of the Farm Service Agency (FSA). This chapter explores those programs and ways in which they contribute toward National and International Soil Security. The two primary roles where FSA programs contribute are establishing minimum working land conservation requirements related to program support and conserving environmentally sensitive land. Most farms and ranches in the United States receive payments through at least one of the disaster assistance, safety net, and/or conservation programs administered through FSA, and all farms that participate in FSA farm programs and farm loan programs as well as other conservation and crop insurance programs administered by USDA are subject to conservation compliance provisions. Conservation compliance is focused on both preventing the loss of wetlands and ensuring that soil erosion is minimized through following site-specific conservation plans. Celebrating its 30th anniversary, the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) is by far FSA’s flagship program related to soil conservation with about 24 million acres nationwide. In general, in exchange for a yearly rental payment, farmers voluntarily agree to remove environmentally sensitive land from agricultural production and plant species that improve environmental health and quality for the life of their 10–15-year contract. By targeting fragile cropland and placing these lands into protective conservation covers, CRP conserves wildlife habitat, improves water quality, and has reduced soil erosion by more than 8 billion tons and enhanced soil productivity significantly since 1986. CRP also sequesters more carbon on private lands than any other federally administered program and reduces greenhouse gases equivalent to removing 8.7 million cars from the road annually.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen G, Witter DJ (2008) Recreational use & economics of conservation reserve (CRP) acreage: a national survey of landowners
Burgess C, Howlin S, McDonald L, Nielson R, Sullivan J (2006) Estimating response of ring-necked pheasant (‘Phasianus colchicus’) to the conservation reserve program. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/economic-and-policy-analysis/natural-resources-analysis/wildlife-habitat-studies/index
Cowan T (2010) Conservation reserve program: status and current issues. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC
Drum RG, Loesch CR, Carrlson KM, Doherty KE, Fedy BC (2015) Assessing the biological benefits of the USDA-Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) for waterfowl and grassland passerines in the Prairie Pothole Region of the United States: spatial analyses for targeting CRP to maximize benefits for migratory birds. Final Report for USDA–FSA Agreement: 12-IA-MRE-CRP-TA. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/Assets/USDA-FSA-Public/usdafiles/EPAS/PDF/drumetal2015_crp_prr_final.pdf
Dunn CP, Stearns F, Guntenspergen GR, Sharpe DM (1993) Ecological benefits of the conservation reserve program. Conserv Biol 7(1):132–139
Farm Service Agency (FSA) (2015) Natural resource analysis. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/economic-and-policy-analysis/natural-resources-analysis/index. Accessed 27 July 2015
Iovanna R (2015) Cost-benefit assessment for conservation compliance interim rule. http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=USDA-2015-0001-0002
McSpadden K (2015) You now have a shorter attention span than a goldfish. http://time.com/3858309/attention-spans-goldfish/#3858309/attention-spans-goldfish/. Accessed 27 July 2015
Mulligan KR, Barbato LS, Seshadri S, Rainwater K, Smith L (2013) CRP effects on the Ogallala Aquifer. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/economic-and-policy-analysis/natural-resources-analysis/water-quality-and-quantity-studies/index
Reynolds RE, Loesch CR, Wangler B, Shaffer TL (2007) Waterfowl response to the conservation reserve program and swampbuster provision in the Prairie Pothole Region, 1992–2004. Reimbursable Funds Agreement 05-IA-04000000-N34. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/Assets/USDA-FSA-Public/usdafiles/EPAS/PDF/duck_report.pdf
Schroeder, MA, Vander Haegen WM (2006) Use of conservation reserve program fields by greater sage-grouse and other shrubsteppe associated wildlife in Washington State. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/economic-and-policy-analysis/natural-resources-analysis/wildlife-habitat-studies/index
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (2013) Conservation reserve program flood damage reduction benefits to downstream urban areas. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/economic-and-policy-analysis/natural-resources-analysis/water-quality-and-quantity-studies/index
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2014) 2012 census of agriculture: United States summary and state data. vol 1, Geographic Area Series, Part 51 AC-12-A-5. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland (outside the USA)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hanson, K.D., Schmidt, J.M. (2017). US Farm Programs and the Impacts on National and International Soil Security. In: Field, D.J., Morgan, C.L.S., McBratney, A.B. (eds) Global Soil Security. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43394-3_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43394-3_38
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43393-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43394-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)