Skip to main content

Whose Security is Important? Communicating Environmental Risk About Soil to a Diverse Audience

  • Chapter
Global Soil Security

Part of the book series: Progress in Soil Science ((PROSOIL))

Abstract

Scientists who do “policy-relevant science” typically are inexperienced and unproductive at communicating to the public and policy makers, the people who ultimately make the decisions that implement or ignore the science. Recent research in the field of cognitive science shows that humans are “motivated reasoners,” who effectively filter out information incompatible with their, and their community’s, value system. Many science education efforts are only partially effective, and some may in fact increase resistance among certain target groups. Science communication is not about improving the message, it is deeply understanding what makes people tick and what doesn’t. A handful of scientists, and a few rock stars like Bono of the band U2, either have deeply considered how to communicate or are inherently endowed with skills that can reach diverse and largely incompatible audiences. “Talking about soil like a rock star” does not imply swagger or unfettered enthusiasm; it implies that the speaker has a deep understanding of ways to connect to both the heart and mind of his or her audience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AGU (2015) Katharine Hayhoe receives 2014 climate communication prize – Eos. Eos 96 doi:10.1029/2015EO022823

  • Amundson R, Berhe AA, Hopmans JW, Olson C, Sztein AE, Sparks DL (2015) Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science 348(6235):1261071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownnell SE, Price JV, Steinman L (2013) Science communication to the general public: why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ 12(1):E6–E10

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby J (2008) Is there a constituency for global poverty? Jubilee 2000 and the future of development advocacy. In: Brainard L, Chollet D (eds) Global development 2.0: can philanthropists, the public, and the poor make poverty history? The Brookings Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Evangelical Climate Initiative (2006) Climate change: an evangelical call to action. http://www.christiansandclimate.org/statement/

  • GALLUP Inc. (2016) Most important problem. Gallup.com. http://www.gallup.com/poll/1675/Most-Important-Problem.aspx

  • Hayhoe K, Farley A (2014) A climate for change: global warming facts for faith-based decisions. FaithWords. http://www.climateforchangethebook.com/

  • Kahan D (2010) Fixing the communications failure. Nature 463:296–297

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koch AB, McBratney M, Adams DJ, Field R, Hill R, Lal L, Abbott D, Angers J, Baldock E, Barbier M, Bird J, Bouma C, Chenu J, Crawford CB, Flora K, Goulding S, Grunwald J, Jastrow J, Lehmann K, Lorenz B, Minansy C, Morgan A, O’Donnell W, Parton CW, Rice DH, Wall D, Whitehead I, Young MZ (2013) Soil security: solving the global soil crisis. Glob Policy J 4:434–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBratney A, Field DJ, Koch A (2014) The dimensions of soil security. Geoderma 213:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney C (2012) Inside the republican brain. The science of why they deny science – and reality. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuetze CF (2013) Environmental warning fatigue sets in. New York Times. March 2

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Amundson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amundson, R. (2017). Whose Security is Important? Communicating Environmental Risk About Soil to a Diverse Audience. In: Field, D.J., Morgan, C.L.S., McBratney, A.B. (eds) Global Soil Security. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43394-3_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics