Abstract
Scientists who do “policy-relevant science” typically are inexperienced and unproductive at communicating to the public and policy makers, the people who ultimately make the decisions that implement or ignore the science. Recent research in the field of cognitive science shows that humans are “motivated reasoners,” who effectively filter out information incompatible with their, and their community’s, value system. Many science education efforts are only partially effective, and some may in fact increase resistance among certain target groups. Science communication is not about improving the message, it is deeply understanding what makes people tick and what doesn’t. A handful of scientists, and a few rock stars like Bono of the band U2, either have deeply considered how to communicate or are inherently endowed with skills that can reach diverse and largely incompatible audiences. “Talking about soil like a rock star” does not imply swagger or unfettered enthusiasm; it implies that the speaker has a deep understanding of ways to connect to both the heart and mind of his or her audience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AGU (2015) Katharine Hayhoe receives 2014 climate communication prize – Eos. Eos 96 doi:10.1029/2015EO022823
Amundson R, Berhe AA, Hopmans JW, Olson C, Sztein AE, Sparks DL (2015) Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science 348(6235):1261071
Brownnell SE, Price JV, Steinman L (2013) Science communication to the general public: why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ 12(1):E6–E10
Busby J (2008) Is there a constituency for global poverty? Jubilee 2000 and the future of development advocacy. In: Brainard L, Chollet D (eds) Global development 2.0: can philanthropists, the public, and the poor make poverty history? The Brookings Institute, Washington, DC
Evangelical Climate Initiative (2006) Climate change: an evangelical call to action. http://www.christiansandclimate.org/statement/
GALLUP Inc. (2016) Most important problem. Gallup.com. http://www.gallup.com/poll/1675/Most-Important-Problem.aspx
Hayhoe K, Farley A (2014) A climate for change: global warming facts for faith-based decisions. FaithWords. http://www.climateforchangethebook.com/
Kahan D (2010) Fixing the communications failure. Nature 463:296–297
Koch AB, McBratney M, Adams DJ, Field R, Hill R, Lal L, Abbott D, Angers J, Baldock E, Barbier M, Bird J, Bouma C, Chenu J, Crawford CB, Flora K, Goulding S, Grunwald J, Jastrow J, Lehmann K, Lorenz B, Minansy C, Morgan A, O’Donnell W, Parton CW, Rice DH, Wall D, Whitehead I, Young MZ (2013) Soil security: solving the global soil crisis. Glob Policy J 4:434–441
McBratney A, Field DJ, Koch A (2014) The dimensions of soil security. Geoderma 213:203–213
Mooney C (2012) Inside the republican brain. The science of why they deny science – and reality. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken
Schuetze CF (2013) Environmental warning fatigue sets in. New York Times. March 2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Amundson, R. (2017). Whose Security is Important? Communicating Environmental Risk About Soil to a Diverse Audience. In: Field, D.J., Morgan, C.L.S., McBratney, A.B. (eds) Global Soil Security. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43394-3_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43394-3_34
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43393-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43394-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)