Skip to main content

Simulating Impacts of Bioenergy Sorghum Residue Return on Soil Organic Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Using the DAYCENT Model

  • Chapter
Book cover Global Soil Security

Abstract

Different residue management practices can affect carbon (C) allocation and thus soil C and nitrogen (N) turnover. A biogeochemical model, DAYCENT, was used to simulate the effects of bioenergy Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] residue return on soil temperature and water content, soil organic carbon (SOC), and greenhouse gas (GHG) [carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O)] emissions under bioenergy Sorghum production. Coefficient of determination (r 2) was used to test model performance. Coefficients of determination between the observed and simulated soil temperature, soil water content, SOC, and annual CO2 and N2O emissions were 0.94, 0.81, 0.75, 0.97, and 0.0057, respectively, indicating that the DAYCENT model captured the major patterns of soil environmental factors and C turnover but was less accurate in estimating N2O emissions. Compared with the simulated control (0 % residue return), the simulated 50 % residue return treatment had 7.77 %, 15.12 %, and 1.25 % greater SOC, annual CO2, and N2O emissions, respectively, averaged over 2 years’ data (2010 and 2011). Similar patterns in the simulated outputs were also observed in our field trials, with percentages being 4.52 %, 15.98 %, and 12.89 %, respectively. The model also successfully reflected the daily GHG flux variation affected by treatments, management practices, and seasonal changes except for missing some high growing season fluxes. In addition, annual variations in the simulated outputs were comparable with field observations except the N2O emissions in the 50 % residue return treatment. Our study indicated that DAYCENT reasonably simulated the main effects of residue return on soil C turnover but underestimated N2O emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler PR, Del Grosso SJ, Parton WJ (2007) Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. Ecol Appl 17:675–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker JM, Fassbinder J, Lamb JA (2014) The impact of corn stover removal on N2O emission and soil respiration: an investigation with automated chambers. BioEnergy Res 7:503–508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell EE, Johnson JMF, Jin VL, Lehman RM, Osborne SL, Varvel GE, Paustian K (2014) Assessing the soil carbon, biomass production, and nitrous oxide emission impact of corn stover management for bioenergy feedstock production using DAYCENT. BioEnergy Res 7:491–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain JF, Miller SA, Frederick JR (2011) Using DAYCENT to quantify on-farm GHG emissions and N dynamics of land use conversion to N-managed switchgrass in the Southern U.S. Agr Ecosyst Environ 141:332–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang K, Warland J, Voroney P, Bartlett P, Wagner-Riddle C (2013) Using DayCENT to simulate carbon dynamics in conventional and no-till agriculture. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:941–950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis SC, Parton WJ, Dohleman FG, Smith CM, Del Grosso SJ, Kent AD, Delucia EH (2010) Comparative biogeochemical cycles of bioenergy crops reveal nitrogen-fixation and low greenhouse gas emissions in a miscanthus × giganteus agro-ecosystem. Ecosystems 13:144–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Del Grosso S, Ojima D, Parton W, Mosier A, Peterson G, Schimel D (2002) Simulated effects of dryland cropping intensification on soil organic matter and greenhouse gas exchanges using the DAYCENT ecosystem model. Environ Pollut 116:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Grosso SJ, Halvorson AD, Parton WJ (2008) Testing DAYCENT model simulations of corn yields and nitrous oxide emissions in irrigated tillage systems in Colorado. J Environ Qual 37:1383–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill JR, Burks PS, Staggenborg SA, Odvody GN, Heiniger RW, Macoon B, Moore KJ, Barrett M, Rooney WL (2014) Yield results and stability analysis from the sorghum regional biomass feedstock trial. BioEnergy Res 7:1026–1034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hao B, Xue Q, Bean BW, Rooney WL, Becker JD (2014) Biomass production, water and nitrogen use efficiency in photoperiod-sensitive sorghum in the Texas high plains. Biomass Bioenergy 62:108–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jin VL, Baker JM, Johnson JMF, Karlen DL, Lehman RM, Osborne SL, Sauer TJ, Stott DE, Varvel GE, Venterea RT, Schmer MR, Wienhold BJ (2014) Soil greenhouse gas emissions in response to corn stover removal and tillage management across the US corn belt. BioEnergy Res 7:517–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JMF, Allmaras RR, Reicosky DC (2006) Estimating source carbon from crop residues, roots and rhizodeposits using the national grain-yield database. Agron J 98:622–636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JMF, Novak JM, Varvel GE, Stott DE, Osborne SL, Karlen DL, Lamb JA, Baker J, Adler PR (2014) Crop residue mass needed to maintain soil organic carbon levels: can it be determined? BioEnergy Res 7:481–490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karlen DL, Johnson JMF (2014) Crop residue considerations for sustainable bioenergy feedstock supplies. BioEnergy Res 7:465–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malhi SS, Lemke R (2007) Tillage, crop residue and N fertilizer effects on crop yield, nutrient uptake, soil quality and nitrous oxide gas emissions in a second 4-yr rotation cycle. Soil Tillage Res 96:269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menichetti L, Ekblad A, Kätterer T (2015) Contribution of roots and amendments to soil carbon accumulation within the soil profile in a long-term field experiment in Sweden. Agr Ecosyst Environ 200:79–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (n.d.) Climate data online (CDO). Available at: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/

  • Olson SN, Ritter K, Rooney W, Kemanian A, McCarl BA, Zhang Y, Hall S, Packer D, Mullet J (2012) High biomass yield energy sorghum: developing a genetic model for C4 grass bioenergy crops. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 6:640–655

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olson SN, Ritter K, Medley J, Wilson T, Rooney WL, Mullet JE (2013) Energy sorghum hybrids: functional dynamics of high nitrogen use efficiency. Biomass Bioenergy 56:307–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne SL, Johnson JMF, Jin VL, Hammerbeck AL, Varvel GE, Schumacher TE (2014) The impact of corn residue removal on soil aggregates and particulate organic matter. BioEnergy Res 7:559–567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parton WJ, Hartman M, Ojima D, Schimel D (1998) DAYCENT and its land surface submodel description and testing. Global Planet Change 19:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter KN, Derner JD (2006) Soil carbon pools in central Texas – prairies, restored grasslands, and croplands. J Soil Water Conserv 61:124–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell JM, Hons FM (1991) Sorghum stover removal effects on soil organic matter content, extractable nutrients, and crop yield. J Sustain Agric 2:25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Propheter JL, Staggenborg SA, Wu X, Wang D (2010) Performance of annual and perennial biofuel crops: yield during the first two years. Agron J 102:806–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocateli AC, Raper RL, Balkcom KS, Arriaga FJ, Bransby DI (2012) Biomass sorghum production and components under different irrigation/tillage systems for the southeastern U.S. Ind Crop Prod 36:589–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney WL, Blumenthal J, Bean B, Mullet JE (2007) Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 1:147–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saffigna PG, Powlson DS, Brooks PC, Thomas GA (1989) Influence of sorghum residues and tillage on soil organic matter and soil microbial biomass in an Australian vertisol. Soil Biol Biochem 21:759–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc (2013) SAS/STAT ® 13.1 User’s guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith WN, Grant BB, Campbell CA, McConkey BG, Desjardins RL, Kröbel R, Malhi SS (2012) Crop residue removal effects on soil carbon: measured and inter-model comparisons. Agr Ecosyst Environ 161:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storlien JO, Hons FM, Wight JP, Heilman JL (2014) Carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions impacted by bioenergy sorghum management. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78:1694–1706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (n.d.) Soil survey of burleson county, Texas. Available at: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_MANUSCRIPTS/texas/TX051/0/Burleson.pdf

  • Wight JP, Hons FM, Storlien JO, Provin TL, Shahandeh H, Wiedenfeld RP (2012) Management effects on bioenergy sorghum growth, yield and nutrient uptake. Biomass Bioenergy 46:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Huang G, Ma J, Li Y, Tang L (2014) Decomposition of aboveground and root litter for three desert herbs: mass loss and dynamics of mineral nutrients. Biol Fertil Soils 50:745–753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Cindy Keough, Mark Easter, Melannie Hartman, Steve Williams, and Yao Zhang for their assistance in modeling. This research was funded by the Texas AgriLife Research Cropping Systems Program and USDA/NIFA Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (grant #2011-67009-30050), ConocoPhillips Fellowship, and Dudley Smith Travel Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fugen Dou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, Y. et al. (2017). Simulating Impacts of Bioenergy Sorghum Residue Return on Soil Organic Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Using the DAYCENT Model. In: Field, D.J., Morgan, C.L.S., McBratney, A.B. (eds) Global Soil Security. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43394-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics