Abstract
Soil survey organizes the landscape into units with common soil properties, characteristics, and classification. Soil survey units can be used to predict soil behavior and thus are useful for making management decisions and evaluating soil change. Traditionally, in the USA, soil survey mapping concepts have been developed with the dominant use of the landscape in mind. Current enhancement of soil survey includes documenting dynamic soil properties and soil change due to ecosystem management. Ecological sites are a concept used to describe “kinds of land” that have common potential kinds and amounts of vegetation and characteristic response to disturbance. In intensively managed (agronomic) systems, inputs (e.g., energy, fertilizer, irrigation water) can confound and homogenize vegetation indicators. In these situations, ecological site concepts, as constructed through state and transition models, can be differentiated based upon levels of soil function (indicated by dynamic soil properties) that occur as a result of the management (disturbance). Groupings and interpreting soil properties using an ecological site framework can serve as a useful tool for soil resource management and assessment and bring whole ecosystem insight into management decisions. Such organizational frameworks should provide information about both reference conditions and alternative management systems of soil functions or dynamic soil properties within an ecological site. Reference conditions might reflect either native or naturalized vegetation or the highest possible function that an ecological site could support. A framework for assessing soil condition in two ecological sites/soil types is examined. The capacity of each ecological site is different as indicated by soil carbon content and aggregate stability. This information allows for documentation of soil change (from reference to alternative states or management systems); it could also be used as a reference for soil health assessments and could be used to enhance soil survey with land use and management-specific information.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbott LK, Manning DAC (2015) Soil health and related ecosystem services in organic agriculture. Sustain Agric Res 4:p116. doi:10.5539/sar.v4n3p116
Andrews SS, Karlen DL, Cambardella CA (2004) The soil management assessment framework: a quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Sci Am J 68:1945–1962
Anonymous (n.d.) Soil health – wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Accessed 15 July 2015 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil_health
Bailey RG, Zoltai SC, Wiken EB (1985) Ecological regionalization in Canada and the United States. Geoforum 16:265–275. doi:10.1016/0016-7185(85)90034-X
Bardgett RD, Herrick JE, Six J et al (2013) Soil ecology and ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bestelmeyer BT, Brown JR, Havstad KM et al (2003) Development and use of state-and-transition models for rangelands. J Range Manag 56:114–126. doi:10.2307/4003894
Bestelmeyer BT, Moseley K, Shaver PL et al (2010) Practical guidance for developing state-and-transition models. Rangelands 32:23–30. doi:10.2111/RANGELANDS-D-10-00077.1
Bouma J (1994) Sustainable land use as a future focus for pedology. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:645–646
Brevik EC, Calzolari C, Miller BA et al (2016) Soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling: history and future directions. Geoderma 264:256–274. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.05.017
Briske DD, Fuhlendorf SD, Smeins FE (2005) State-and-transition models, thresholds, and rangeland health: a synthesis of ecological concepts and perspectives. Rangel Ecol Manag 58:1–10. doi:10.2111/1551-5028(2005)58<1:SMTARH>2.0.CO;2
Briske DD, Bestelmeyer BT, Stringham TK, Shaver PL (2008) Recommendations for development of resilience-based state-and-transition models. Rangel Ecol Manag 61:359–367
Burt R (ed) (2004) Soil survey methods manual, Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 42 Ver. 4.0. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC
Caudle D, DiBenedetto J, Karl M, Sanchez H, Talbot C (2013) Interagency ecological site handbook for rangelands. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. http://jornada.nmsu.edu/sites/jornada.nmsu.edu/files/InteragencyEcolSiteHandbook.pdf
Conant RT, Paustian K, Elliott ET (2001) Grassland management and conversion into grassland: effects on soil carbon. Ecol Appl 11:343–355. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0343:GMACIG]2.0.CO;2
Damsma KM, Rose MT, Cavagnaro TR (2015) Landscape scale survey of indicators of soil health in grazing systems. Soil Res 53:154–167
De Bakker H (1970) Purposes of soil classification. Geoderma 4:195–208. doi:10.1016/0016-7061(70)90003-0
Doran JW (2002) Soil health and global sustainability: translating science into practice. Agric Ecosyst Environ 88:119–127. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00246-8
Doran JW, Zeiss MR (2000) Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol 15:3–11. doi:10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00067-6
Duniway MC, Bestelmeyer BT, Tugel A (2010) Soil processes and properties that distinguish ecological sites and states. Rangelands 32:9–15. doi:10.2111/RANGELANDS-D-10-00090.1
FSA (n.d.) Farm Service Agency, United States Department of Agriculture. Conservation Programs. In: temp_FSA_02_Landing_InteriorPages. http://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/conservation-programs/index. Accessed 21 July 2015
Gugino BK, Abawi GS, Idowu OJ, Schindelbeck RR, Smith LL, Thies JE, van Es HM (2009) Cornell soil health assessment training manual. Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Geneva
Herrick JE (2000) Soil quality: an indicator of sustainable land management? Appl Soil Ecol 15:75–83. doi:10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00073-1
Huggett RJ (1975) Soil landscape systems: a model of soil genesis. Geoderma 13:1–22. doi:10.1016/0016-7061(75)90035-X
Karlen DL, Andrews SS, Doran JW (2001) Soil quality: current concepts and applications. Adv Agron 7:1–40
Knight A, Cheng Z, Grewal SS et al (2013) Soil health as a predictor of lettuce productivity and quality: a case study of urban vacant lots. Urban Ecosyst 16:637–656. doi:10.1007/s11252-013-0288-1
Lehman RM, Acosta-Martinez V, Buyer JS et al (2015) Soil biology for resilient, healthy soil. J Soil Water Conserv 70:12A–18A. doi:10.2489/jswc.70.1.12A
McBratney A, Minasny B, Wheeler I, Malone BP (2012) Frameworks for digital soil assessment. In: Minasny B, Malone BP, McBratney AB (eds) Digital soil assessment and beyond. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 9–14
McBratney A, Field DJ, Koch A (2014) The dimensions of soil security. Geoderma 213:203–213. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.013
Miller BA, Schaetzl RJ (2014) The historical role of base maps in soil geography. Geoderma 230–231:329–339. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.04.020
National Cooperative Soil Survey (n.d.) National cooperative soil survey characterization database http://ncsslabdatamart.sc.egov.usda.gov/. Accessed Tuesday, 28 July 2015
NRCS (n.d.) United State Department of Agriculture – Natural Resource Conservation Service e directive H_190_NESH – National Ecological Site Handbook. Accessed online http://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/viewerFS.aspx?hid=35306 21 July 2015
NRCS-USDA (2006) Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. US Department of Agriculture Handbook, 296
Omernik JM (1987) Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 77:118–125. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00149.x
Pellant ML, Shaver P, Pyke DA, Herrick JE (2005) Interpreting indicators of rangeland health, version 4, Technical Reference 1734-6. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Science and Technology Center, Denver, BLM/WO/ST-00/001+ 1734/REV05, 2005
Printz JL, Toledo D, Boltz SC (2014) Rangeland health assessment: the key to understanding and assessing rangeland soil health in the Northern Great Plains. J Soil Water Conserv 69:73A–77A. doi:10.2489/jswc.69.3.73A
Schoenenberger P, Wysocki D, Libohova (2014) NSSC Webinar: soil systems – a bridge between soils and the rest of the world. Available online https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gsf3abO1wHU. Accessed 21 July 2015
Soil Survey Division Staff (1993) Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. Available online at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ref/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262. Accessed 21 July 2015
Soil Survey Staff (2015a) Natural resources conservation service, United States Department of Agriculture. Official Soil Series Descriptions. Available online at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detailfull/soils/home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053587. Accessed 21 July 2015
Soil Survey Staff (2015b) Natural resources conservation service, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database. Available online at http://sdmdataaccess.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed 21 July 2015
Sonneveld MPW, Bouma J, Veldkamp A (2002) Refining soil survey information for a Dutch soil series using land use history. Soil Use Manag 18:157–163. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2002.tb00235.x
Stringham TK, Krueger WC, Shaver PL (2003) State and transition modeling: an ecological process approach. J Range Manag 56:106–113
Tisdall JM, Oades JM (1982) Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. J Soil Sci 33:141–163
Tugel AJ, Wills SA, Herrick JE (2008) Soil change guide: procedures for soil survey and resource inventory, version 1.1. USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (2013) Soil health key points. Available at: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1082147.pdf
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (2015a) National Soil Survey Handbook (NSSH), title 430-VI. Available online at http://www.soils.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/ref/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242. Accessed 14 July 2015
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (2015b) Ecological Site Description (ESD) system for rangeland and forestland. Available at: https://esis.sc.egov.usda.gov/Welcome/pgReportLocation.aspx?type=ESD. Accessed 21 July 2015
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (2016) Soil health. Available at: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/soils/health/. Accessed 24 Apr 2016
Wall DH, Bardgett RD, Behan-Pelletier V et al (2012) Soil ecology and ecosystem services. OUP, Oxford
Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York
Wikipedia, Soil health. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil_health. Accessed 21 Jul 2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wills, S. et al. (2017). Using Soil Survey to Assess and Predict Soil Condition and Change. In: Field, D.J., Morgan, C.L.S., McBratney, A.B. (eds) Global Soil Security. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43394-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43394-3_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43393-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43394-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)