Skip to main content

Investigating Elderly Care Contexts According to Stakeholders’ Needs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovating in Practice
  • 1273 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to present an innovative and participatory model for assessment, improvement of quality and innovation in residential facilities for fragile elderly people. Starting from a theoretical and practical reflection on the value of the care relationship in these organisations, this chapter focuses on innovating care practices in these organisations. In this model care is understood not only as a practice but as an attitude of the organisation: an approach to assistance which goes beyond the mere satisfaction of physical needs, looking at the person as a whole and working within a framework of constant promotion of their well-being. The chapter presents a method for innovating elderly care services through evaluation, self-evaluation and participatory planning. This method was developed through two case studies, the research design and tools of which are presented. The research is guided by an approach of Educational Evaluation [Scriven (The methodology of evaluation. Rand McNally, 1967; Evaluation thesaurus. Edge Press, 1981; Evaluation thesaurus. Sage, 1999)] and Action Research: the professionals are actively involved both during the definition of the quality standards and their relative evaluation. Some specific evaluation tools are developed, and the data gathered is constantly fed back to the professionals in order to stimulate their reflexive practice and foster innovation by improving the quality of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrew, R. (2010). Organizational social capital, structure and performance. Human Relations, 63(5), 583–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becchi, E., & Bondioli, A. (1994). La valutazione: Una pratica in via di definizione. In M. Ferrari (Ed.), La valutazione di contesti prescolari. Bergamo: Junior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondioli, A., & Ferrari, M. (a cura di) (2004). Verso un modello di valutazione formativa. Bergamo: Junior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brune, K. B. (1995). Eden Alternative certification, pilot group. New Berlin, NY: Lindengrove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brune, K. B. (2011). Culture change in long term care services: Eden-greenhouse-aging in the community. Educational Gerontology, 37(6), 506–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calkins, M. P. (2002). The nursing home of the future: Are you ready?. Nursing Homes Long-Term Care Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattel, R. B. (1966). Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Chicago: Rand McNall & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons, D., & Mace, N. (1996). Quality of life in long term care. New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. (1969). The mechanism of mind. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston, MA: Heat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., & Gruber, T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: A social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellström, P. E. (2010). Practice-based innovation: A learning perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1/2), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A., & Myles, J. (2002). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuglsang, L., & Sørensen, F. (2011). The balance between bricolage and innovation: Management dilemmas in sustainable public innovation. The Service Industries Journal, 31(4), 581–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HusĂ©n, T., & Postlethwaite, T. N. (1994). International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellaghan, T., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). International handbook of educational evaluation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, P., De Meester, M., Kristensen, T. S., & Braeckman, L. (2014). Relationships of organizational social capital with the presence of “gossip and slander”, “quarrels and conflicts”, sick leave, and poor work ability in nursing homes. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 87(8), 929–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, V. M., & Neal, M. B. (1999). Working and caring for the elderly. International perspectives. Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel, Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J., & Levin, W. C. (1988). The human puzzle: An introduction to social psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., & Ostner, I. (1994). Gender and evolution of European social policies (ZeS-Arbeitpaper. No. 4). Centre for Social Policy Research, University of Bremen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luppi, E. (2009). Education in old age: An exploratory study. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 28, 241–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luppi, E. (2010). Autonomy and citizenship in the late third age. Educational Gerontology, 36, 872–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C. (1982). Burnout: The cost of caring. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, I., & Redfern, S. (1997). Mental health care for elderly people. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, A. N., & Schnelle, J. F. (2008). The nursing home culture change movement: Recent past, present, and future directions for research. The Gerontologist, 48, 142–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1981). Evaluation thesaurus. Inverness, CA: Edge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1999). Evaluation thesaurus. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shura, R., Siders, R. A., & Dannefer, D. (2011). Culture change in long-term care: Participatory action research and the role of the resident. Gerontologist, 51(2), 212–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, F., Sundbo, J., & Mattsson, J. (2013). Organisational conditions for service encounter-based innovation. Research Policy, 42, 1446–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundbo, J., & Toivonen, M. (2011). User-based innovation in services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. H. (2006). In the arms of elders: A parable of wise leadership and community building. Acton, MA: VanderWyk & Burnham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronvoll, B., Brown, S. W., Gremler, D. D., & Edvardsson, B. (2011). Paradigms in service research. Journal of Service Management, 22(5), 560–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26, 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H. J., & Haertel, G. D. (Eds.). (1990). International enciclopedia of educational evaluation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2013). The European health report 2012: Charting the way to well-being. Copenhagen. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/184161/The-European-Health-Report-2012,-FULL-REPORT-w-cover.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Luppi PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Luppi, E. (2017). Investigating Elderly Care Contexts According to Stakeholders’ Needs. In: Russo-Spena, T., Mele, C., Nuutinen, M. (eds) Innovating in Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43380-6_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics