Skip to main content

Apocalypse Here and Now

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Queer Apocalypses
  • 555 Accesses

Abstract

The apocalyptic references included in the zombie filmography, and the messianic and Christological references present in LaBruce’s latest films, simultaneously evoke an “end of times” and a new beginning, a fracture in the present that is not a projection of the future but a busting of subjectivity into modernity. Thus they invite a turning toward the past, so as to retrace the origin of those cultural apparatuses that curb the imaginary and render the thought of this temporality exceptional. There are many possible paths that can be taken, but the one that I would particularly like to focus on leads to an investigation into the political ontology upon which the Oedipal “futurist” ideology is founded, the ideology that constitutes the polemic objective of antisocial queer theories. Edelman, as well as Bersani and de Lauretis, contrasts the subject of the drive with a not-well-delineated liberal subject who is devoted to the attainment of social recognition, usefulness and pleasure. Despite the fact that in the United States the adjective “liberal” has an undertone of meaning that distinguishes it from the Italian “liberale,”1 it is undeniable that the subject against whom the three thinkers argue is none other than the current and politically correct version of the individual who is at once a citizen and a subject of the modern state (and of that which is left of it in the postmodern world of globalization). Suspending judgment about what the reality of the human is, I will attempt now to explore that theoretical smithy of the political modern imaginary in which both the individual and the state are shaped: the thought that Thomas Hobbes developed in Elements of Law Natural and Politic (1640),2 in De cive (1642) and above all in Leviathan (1651). I will investigate the temporality in which Hobbes positions individuals, and the one which, instead, he renders inaccessible to them. Finally, I will show how within the temporality of the state, beneath or above it, the opening of another temporal dimension has always been possible. To this end, moving continually in reverse on this journey, I will invite readers to glance at two traditions of thought that historically precede the break enacted by Western modernity in Christianity, but that linger in it like specters: the Hebrew and the classic Greek. After the zombie, before it, we will meet other monstrous figures of the end of times, and other metaphors of the bestiality of the human.

Translation by Julia Heim

Oh God, I could be bounded in a nutshell and count myself a king of infinite space, were it not that I have bad dreams.(William Shakespeare, Hamlet)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bazzicalupo, Laura 2006. Il governo delle vite: Biopolitica ed economia. Roma, Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. L’armonia dell’irregolare. Hobbes e il manierismo politico. In La filosofia politica di Hobbes, ed. Giulio Maria Chiodi, and Roberto Gatti. Milan: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Biopolitica: Una mappa concettuale. Urbino: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernini, Lorenzo. 2008. Le pecore e il pastore: Critica, politica, etica nel pensiero di Michel Foucault. Naples: Liguori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersani, Leo, and Adam Phillips. 2008. Intimacies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bodei, Remo. 2003. Geometria delle passioni. Paura, speranza, felicità: Filosofia e uso politico. Milan: Feltrinelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2004a. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Frames of War: When is Life Grievable? New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnesi Camellone, Mauro. 2009a. La passione rimossa: Nota sulla speranza nel Leviatano. In La filosofia politica di Hobbes, ed. Giulio M. Chiodi, and Roberto Gatti. Milan: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009b. La politica e l’immagine: Saggio su Ernst Bloch. Quodlibet: Macerata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farneti, Roberto. 2007. Hobbes on Salvation. In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Patricia Springborg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forti, Simona. [2012] 2014. New Demons: Rethinking Power and Evil Today. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1982b. Afterword by Michel Foucault: The Subject and Power (Why Study Power: The Question of the Subject and How Power is Exercised?). In Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galli, Carlo. 1996. Genealogia della politica: Carl Schmitt e la crisi del pensiero politico moderno. Bologna: Il Mulino, 20102.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Lo sguardo di Giano: Saggi su Carl Schmitt. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas [1651] 1994. Leviathan. Edited by Edwin Curley. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1889] 2013. Elements of Law Natural and Politic. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Man and Citizen: (De homine and De cive). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, Kinch. 2004. Disarming the Prophets: Thomas Hobbes and Predictive Power. In New Critical Perspectives on Hobbes’s Leviathan upon the 350th Anniversary of its Publication. Milan: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, Noel. 2004. The Title Page of Leviathan, Seen in a Curious Perspective. In Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcucci, Nicola. 2010. Lo specchio del Leviatano: Il potere di riconoscere tra antropologia e rappresentanza. In La sovranità scomposta: Sull’attualità del, eds. Bernini, Lorenzo, Marcucci, Nicola, Farnesi Camellone, Mauro. Milan, Udine: Mimesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, Samuel I. 1962. The Hunting of Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, José Esteban. 2009. Cruising Utopia: The Then and There of Queer Futurity. New York, London: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negri, Antonio, and Michael Hardt. 2004. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandolfi, Alessandro. 1999. Potere pastorale e teologia politica nel pensiero di Michel Foucault. In Il pensiero politico, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plautus. 1630. Macci Plauti Comoediae Superst. XX, Amsterdam: Johannes Janssonium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polin, Raymond. 1981. Hobbes, Dieu et les hommes. Paris: puf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulcini, Elena. [2001] 2012. The Individual Without Passions. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonazzi, Mauro. 2013. Degenerazionismo: Psichiatria, eugenetica e biopolitica. Milan: Bruno Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Leo. 1932. Anerkennungen zu Carl Schmitt, Der Begriff des Politischen. In Ausgabe des Archivs für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1963. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: Its Basis and Its Genesis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1968. What is Political Philosophy? And Other Studies. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarizzo, Davide. 2010. La vita, un’invenzione recente. Rome, Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tralau, Johan. 2007. Leviathan, the Beast of Myth: Medusa, Dionysos, and the Riddle of Hobbes’s Sovereign Monster. In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan, ed. Patricia Springborg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Dominique. 2008. Hobbes et l’histoire du salut: Ce que le Christ fait á Lèviathan. Paris: PUPS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bernini, L. (2017). Apocalypse Here and Now. In: Queer Apocalypses. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43361-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics