Abstract
This chapter explores Dewey’s construct of aesthetic experience and the role that the aesthetic plays in knowing: knowing as a coherence of things to be known, developing one’s sense of identity in relation to that knowing, and the passions that emerge in an “aesthetic experience” that lays the foundation for future knowing, identity, and passions. Drawing on Dewey’s ideas, Girod, Rau, and Schepige developed the construct “aesthetic understanding” to provide a theoretical lens for describing students’ experience of coming to know science content. This chapter develops the aesthetic understanding construct further into a methodological framework, called a knowledge-identity-passion (KIP) analysis, that can be applied to research exploring aesthetic experience in two “research moments”: the immediate effects of an aesthetic experience on knowledge, identity, and passion and the life trajectory that follows an aesthetic experience. A KIP analysis can be applied to research examining the effects and meanings attached to experiences through close analysis of knowledge, identity, and passion, both individually and in relation to each other. To illustrate the power of a KIP analysis, narratives of four science educators are provided. The practical applications and methodological possibilities and limitations of a KIP Analysis are then discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Professional development funded by the Victorian Department of Education and Early Childhood Development. Research funded by the Centre for Research in Educational Futures and Innovation, Deakin University.
- 2.
Research funded by the Australian Office for Learning and Teaching. Project reference ID12-4212.
References
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.
Anderson, M. E., & Risner, D. (2013). “Art life in action”: Case study of a teaching artist in theatre. Teaching Artist Journal, 11(3), 139–146.
Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 1–25.
Australian Academy of Science (AAS). (2014). Primary connections. Canberra: AAS.
Avraamidou, L. (2015). Stories of self and science: Preservice elementary teachers’ identity wok through time and across contexts. Pedagogies: An International Journal. doi:10.1080/1554480X.2015.1047837.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
Bennison, A. (2015). Developing an analytic lens for investigating identity as an embedder-of-numeracy. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27, 1–19.
Black, A. (2002). Making sense of what it means to teach: Artful representations as meaning-making tools. Teacher Development, 6(1), 75–88.
Bredeson, P. V. (2002). The architecture of professional development: Materials, messages and meaning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 661–675.
Burgess, C. M. (2014). Shifting sands: The narrative construction of early career aboriginal teachers’ professional identities at the cultural interface. Unpublished doctoral dissertation thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Campbell, C., & Chittleborough, G. (2014). The “new” science specialists: Promoting and improving the teaching of science in primary schools. Teaching Science, 60(1), 19–29.
Chubb, I. (2014). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Australia’s future. Canberra: Australian Government.
Darby, L. (2005). Science students’ perceptions of engaging pedagogy. Research in Science Education, 35, 425–445.
Darby, L. (2009). Translating a “relevance imperative” into junior secondary mathematics and science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 277–288.
Darby-Hobbs, L. (2013). Responding to a relevance imperative in school science and mathematics: Humanising the curriculum through story. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 77–97.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.
Dewey, J. (1934/1980). Art as experience. New York: Berkley.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.
Eisner, E. W. (1979). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Girod, M. (2001). Nobody likes soap in their eyes: Portraying a more inviting science by teaching for aesthetic understanding. CESI Science, 34(2), 20–24.
Girod, M., & Wong, D. (2002). An aesthetic (Deweyan) perspective on science learning: Case studies of three fourth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 102(3), 199–224.
Girod, M., Rau, C., & Schepige, A. (2003). Appreciating the beauty of science ideas: Teaching for aesthetic understanding. Science Education, 87, 574–587.
Goodson, I. F. (1997). Representing teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(1), 111–117.
Harlen, W., Holroyd, C., & Byrne, M. (1995). Confidence and understanding in teaching science and technology in primary schools (SCRE research report 65). Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
Hobbs, L. (2012). Examining the aesthetic dimensions of teaching: Relationships between teacher knowledge, identity and passion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 718–727.
Hobbs, L. (2013). Boundary crossings of out-of-field teachers: Locating learning possibilities amid disruption. In J. Langan-Fox & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Boundary-spanning in organizations: Network, influence, and conflict (pp. 7–28). New York: Routledge.
Hobbs, L., & Davis, R. (2013). Establishing connection through narrative in Mathematics, Science & Technology. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1289–1305.
Hobbs, L., Jones, M., King, J., Chittleborough, G., Redman, C., Campbell, C., Kenny, J., & Herbert, S. (2013). Science Teacher Educator Partnerships with Schools (STEPS): Developing an Interpretive Framework for Primary Science Teacher Education. Paper presented to the Contemporary Approaches to Research in Mathematics, Science, Health and Environmental Education, Deakin University Melbourne, 28–29 November, 2013. Accessed at http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/src/crefi/events/car-2013.php#papers
Howitt, C. (2007). Pre-service elementary teachers’ perceptions of factors in an holistic methods course influencing their confidence in teaching science. Research in Science Education, 37(1), 41–58.
Hsieh, B. (2015). The importance of orientation: Implications of professional identity on classroom practice and for professional learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 178–190.
Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764–791.
Jakobson, B., & Wickman, P. (2007). The roles of aesthetic experience in elementary school science. Research in Science Education, 38, 45–65.
Kelly, L. (2013). Marine educators: Linking personal commitment, education and public policy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation thesis, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia.
Lloyd, K. L., Braund, M., Crebbi, C., & Phipps, R. (2000). Primary teachers’ confidence about and understanding of process skills. Teacher Development, 4(3), 353–370.
Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons: International comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Final report. Australian Council of Learned Academies, Melbourne, Vic.
McIntyre, J., & Hobson, A. J. (2015). Supporting beginner teacher identity development: External mentors and the third space. Research Papers in Education. doi:10.1080/02671522.2015.1015438.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pugh, K. J., & Girod, M. (2007). Science, art, and experience: Constructing a science pedagogy from Dewey’s aesthetics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 9–27.
Rubin, L. J. (1985). Artistry in teaching. New York: Random House.
Simmons, P., Emory, A., Carter, T., Coker, T., Finnega, B., Crockett, D., et al. (2008). Beginning teachers: Beliefs and classroom actions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 930–954.
Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wickman, P. O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning making as situated talk and action. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Zembylas, M. (2007). Risks and pleasures: A Deleuzo-Guattarian pedagogy of desire in education. British Educational Research Journal, 33(3), 331–347.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hobbs, L., Kelly, L. (2017). The Heart of the Educator: Aesthetic Experience Shaping Knowledge, Identity, and Passion. In: Bellocchi, A., Quigley, C., Otrel-Cass, K. (eds) Exploring Emotions, Aesthetics and Wellbeing in Science Education Research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43353-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43353-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43351-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43353-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)