Why Are Exotic Birds So Successful in Urbanized Environments?
Many nonindigenous organisms, including birds, are often restricted to human-altered environments within the region of introduction. The classical explanation is that human-related alterations make the environment easier to invade by reducing biotic resistance and offering new niche opportunities. However, the pattern may also reflect that many more species have been introduced in human-altered environments and/or that traits associated with invasion success and the ability to thrive in these environments are related. In this chapter, we argue that if we want to fully understand why exotic organisms are mainly successful in human-altered environments, we need to see the invasion process as a set of stages with different probabilities of being transited. Applied to birds, this framework suggests that there is a high probability that an exotic species ends up associated with human-altered environments if the species: (1) is more abundant (and hence more available for introduction) in urbanized environments; (2) has a higher chance to be successfully transported, as it is already habituated to humans; and (3) has a higher probability to be introduced in an urbanized environment, where most humans live. If these arguments are true, then the exotic species is likely to successfully establish itself in the new region because the species should already have the traits needed to persist in the novel environment. Although more supporting evidence is needed, the proposed framework provides a general solution for the paradox that many invaders are more successful in the new environment than most native species.
KeywordsBiological invasions Invasion success Biotic resistance Novel niches Life history Anthropocene
We are grateful to Enrique Murgui and Marcus Hedblom for inviting us to contribute to the present book, and to Louis Lefebvre, Richard Duncan, Tim Blackburn, Phill Cassey, Joan Maspons, Miquel Vall-llosera, Nacho Bartomeus, Montse Vilà, Joan Pino, Salit Kark, Sven Bacher, Wojciech Solarz, Wolfgang Nentwig, Simon Reader and Diego Vasquez for fruitful discussions over the past years. This work was supported by a Proyecto de Investigación (ref. CGL2013-47448-P) from the Spanish government to DS and is a contribution by MD to the thematic networks GlobiMed and REMEDINAL. CGL is supported by the project PUC1203-MECESUP P. Universidad Católica de Chile and Ministerio de Educación, Chile.
- Batllori X, Nos R (1985) Presencia de la Cotorrita gris (Myiopsitta monachus) y de la Cotorrita de collar (Psittacula krameri) en el área metropolitana de Barcelona. Misc Zool 9:407–411Google Scholar
- Ehrlich P (1989) Attributes of invaders and the invading process: vertebrates. In: Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F et al (eds) Biological invasions, a global perspective. Wiley, Chichester, pp 315–328Google Scholar
- Holt RDR, Barfield M, Gomulkiewicz R (2005) Theories of niche conservatism and evolution: could exotic species be potential tests? In: Sax D, Stachowicz JJ, Gaines S (eds) Species invasions. W. H. Freeman, Gordonsville, VA, pp 259–290Google Scholar
- Janiga M (1991) Interclutch interval and territoriality in the feral pigeon, Columba livia Gm. 1789. Biologia 46:961–966Google Scholar
- Mayr E (1965) The nature of colonising birds. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GL (eds) The genetics of colonizing species. Academic, New York, pp 29–43Google Scholar
- McLain DK, Moulton MP, Sanderson J (1999) Sexual selection and extinction: the fate of plumage-dimorphic and plumage-monomorphic birds introduced onto islands. Evol Ecol Res 1:549–565Google Scholar
- Miranda AC (2016) Mechanisms of behavioural change in urban animals: the role of microevolution and phenotypic plasticity. In: Murgui E, Hedblom M (eds) Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 113–134Google Scholar
- Murgui E (2001) Factors influencing the distribution of exotic bird species in Comunidad Valenciana (Spain). Ardeola 48:149–160Google Scholar
- Murgui E, Valentín A (2003) Relación entre las características del paisaje urbano y la comunidad de aves introducidas en la ciudad de Valencia (España). Ardeola 50:201–214Google Scholar
- Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2012) Cities and biodiversity outlook. Executive SummaryGoogle Scholar
- Shochat E, Ovadia O (2011) Invasion, evenness, and species diversity in human-dominated ecosystems. In: Lopez-Pujol J (ed) The importance of biological interactions in the study of biodiversity. TechOpen Access Publisher, doi: 10.5772/24385
- Simberloff D (1995) Why do introduced species appear to devastate islands more than mainland areas? Pac Sci 49:87–97Google Scholar
- Tomiałojć L (2016) Human initiation of synurbic populations of waterfowl, raptors, pigeons and cage birds. In: Murgui E, Hedblom M (eds) Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 271–286Google Scholar
- Williamson MH (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar