Skip to main content

Birds on Urban Wastelands

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments

Abstract

Responses of birds to urbanisation are manifold. Urbanisation directly influences birds by changing ecosystem processes, habitat and food supply; urbanisation indirectly influences birds by affecting their predators, competitors or disease organisms. A special urban habitat is wasteland since it occurs only for short periods in urban agglomerations. Their habitat characteristics could rarely be found in other urban land-use types. In earlier times, large herbivores, fire, floods, windfall, shifting dunes or dynamics of natural river courses removed vegetation and created open landscapes. In human-dominated landscapes, these processes are mostly prevented. In urban settings, building work, demolition and removal of industrial or railroad areas simulate ecological processes that became rare in human-dominated industrial landscapes. Whereas the population dynamics of open-land species in agricultural areas were intensively studied, urban wastelands were rarely examined. These ‘unintentional’ habitats are populated by a number of rare species. Thereby, species differ considerably from each other with regard to their requirements. Some bird species are sensible to human intrusion, some avoid densely built areas, and some are sensitive to the surroundings of habitat patches that are irrelevant for others. Most bird species that prosper in urban habitats are generalists, but also some habitat specialists are under certain conditions able to exploit the resources of an urban environment. The aim of this chapter is to show the state of knowledge on birds on urban wastelands, their value as habitat for endangered bird species and the influence of the urban space that surrounds wastelands on their avifauna.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angold P, Sadler JP, Hill MO et al (2006) Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Sci Total Environ 360:196–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergen F, Abs M (1997) Verhaltensökologische Studie zur Gesangsaktivität von Blaumeise (Parus caeruleus), Kohlmeise (Parus major) und Buchfink (Fringilla coelebs) in einer Großstadt. J Für Ornithol 138:451–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6:506–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Fernández-Juricic E, Zollner PA, Garity SC (2005) Inter-specific variation in avian responses to human disturbance. J Appl Ecol 42:943–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 74:46–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke A (1980) Observations on how close certain passerine species will tolerate an approaching human in rural and suburban areas. Biol Conserv 18:85–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald P, Green R, Heath M (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drinnan IN (2005) The search for fragmentation thresholds in a southern Sydney suburb. Biol Conserv 124:339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyre M, Luff M, Woodward J (2003) Beetles (Coleoptera) on brownfield sites in England: an important conservation resource? J Insect Conserv 7:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E, Jimenez MD, Lucas E (2001) Bird tolerance to human disturbance in urban parks of Madrid (Spain): management implications. In: Marzluff J, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 259–273

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Flemming SP, Chiasson RD, Smith PC et al (1988) Piping Plover Status in Nova Scotia related to its reproductive and behavioral responses to human disturbance. J Field Ornithol 59:321–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores A, Pickett ST, Zipperer WC et al (1998) Adopting a modern ecological view of the metropolitan landscape: the case of a greenspace system for the New York City region. Landsc Urban Plan 39:295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstengarbe F-W, Badeck F, Hattermann F et al (2003) Studie zur klimatischen Entwicklung im Land Brandenburg bis 2055 und deren Auswirkungen auf den Wasserhaushalt, die Forst-und Landwirtschaft sowie die Ableitung erster Perspektiven. PIK Potsdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson C (1998) Brownfield red data: the values artificial habitats have for uncommon invertebrates. English Nature, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Glutz von Blotzheim U, Bauer K, Bezzel E (1985) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Aula-Verlag GmbH, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutzwiller KJ, Marcum HA, Harvey HB et al (1998) Bird tolerance to human intrusion in Wyoming montane forests. Condor 100:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilig GK (2012) World urbanization prospects: the 2011 revision

    Google Scholar 

  • Helzer CJ, Jelinski DE (1999) The relative importance of patch area and perimeter-area ratio to grassland breeding birds. Ecol Appl 9:1448–1458

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbst H, Herbst V (2006) The development of an evaluation method using a geographic information system to determine the importance of wasteland sites as urban wildlife areas. Landsc Urban Plan 77:178–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann A, Gruehn D, Ziegler-Hennings C (2010) Old Brownfields, new parks of tomorrow. Chances to improve the environment of the cities. Real Corp, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DH, Igl LD (2001) Area requirements of grassland birds: a regional perspective. The Auk 118:24–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones ZF, Bock CE (2002) Conservation of grassland birds in an urbanizing landscape: a historical perspective. The Condor 104:643–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kattwinkel M, Strauss B, Biedermann R, Kleyer M (2009) Modelling multi-species response to landscape dynamics: mosaic cycles support urban biodiversity. Landsc Ecol 24:929–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleyer M, Biedermann R, Henle K et al (2007) Mosaic cycles in agricultural landscapes of Northwest Europe. Basic Appl Ecol 8:295–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köstler H, Müller T, Saure C et al (2006) Monitoring im Landschaftspark Berlin-Adlershof

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarik I (2011) Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environ Pollut 159:1974–1983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langner M, Endlicher W (eds) (2007) Shrinking cities: effects on urban ecology and challenges for urban development. Peter Lang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Litteral J, Shochat E (2016) The role of landscape-scale factors in shaping urban bird communities. In: Murgui E, Hedblom M (eds) Ecology and conservation of birds in urban environments. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 135–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathey J, Rink D (2010) Urban wastelands–a chance for biodiversity in cities? Ecological aspects, social perceptions and acceptance of wilderness by residents. Urban Biodivers Des 7:406–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthies S, Rüter S, Prasse R (2013) Urban green spaces—the effects of patch size and distance to the urban edge on vascular plant and bird species diversity. In: IALE 2013 European Congress, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer U, Peschel T, Schmitz S (2000) The flora of selected urban land-use types in Berlin and Potsdam with regard to nature conservation in cities. Landsc Urban Plan 46:209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle MJ, Villard M-A (1999) Patch characteristics and landscape context as predictors of species presence and abundance: a review. Ecoscience 6:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Meffert PJ, Dziock F (2012) What determines occurrence of threatened bird species on urban wastelands? Biol Conserv 153:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffert PJ, Dziock F (2013) The influence of urbanisation on diversity and trait composition of birds. Landsc Ecol 28:943–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffert PJ, Marzluff JM, Dziock F (2012) Unintentional habitats: value of a city for the wheatear (Oenanthe oenanthe). Landsc Urban Plan 108:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol 16:330–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SG, Knight RL, Miller CK (1998) Influence of recreational trails on breeding bird communities. Ecol Appl 8:162–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (2008) Flight distance of urban birds, predation, and selection for urban life. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murgui E (2005) València. In: Kelcey J, Rheinwald G (eds) Birds in European cities. Ginster, St. Katharinen, pp 335–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Öckinger E, Dannestam A, Smith HG (2009) The importance of fragmentation and habitat quality of urban grasslands for butterfly diversity. Landsc Urban Plan 93:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswalt P, Rieniets T, Schirmel H et al (2006) Atlas of shrinking cities. Hatje Cantz, Ostfildern

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett S, Cadenasso M, Grove J et al (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:127–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyle RM (2002) Eden in a vacant lot: special places, species, and kids in the neighborhood of life. In: Kahn P, Kellert S (eds) Children and nature: psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, pp 305–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Schadek U, Strauss B, Biedermann R, Kleyer M (2009) Plant species richness, vegetation structure and soil resources of urban brownfield sites linked to successional age. Urban Ecosyst 12:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger MD, Manley PN, Holyoak M (2008) Distinguishing stressors acting on land bird communities in an urbanizing environment. Ecology 89:2302–2314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sorace A, Gustin M (2010) Bird species of conservation concern along urban gradients in Italy. Biodivers Conserv 19:205–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME (1991) Land use planning and wildlife maintenance: guidelines for conserving wildlife in an urban landscape. J Am Plann Assoc 57:313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss B, Biedermann R (2006) Urban brownfields as temporary habitats: driving forces for the diversity of phytophagous insects. Ecography 29:928–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift N, Amin A (2002) Cities: reimagining the urban. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner WR, Nakamura T, Dinetti M (2004) Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. Bioscience 54:585–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zande A, Vos P (1984) Impact of a semi-experimental increase in recreation intensity on the densities of birds in groves and hedges on a lake shore in The Netherlands. Biol Conserv 30:237–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vessel MF, Wong HH (1987) Natural history of vacant lots. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery PD, Hunter ML, Melvin SM (1994) Effects of habitat area on the distribution of grassland birds in Maine. Conserv Biol 8:1087–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westmoreland D, Best LB (1985) The effect of disturbance on Mourning Dove nesting success. The Auk 102:774–780

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahner RH (1988) Changes in wildlife communities near edges. Conserv Biol 2:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalden D (1992) The influence of recreational disturbance on common sandpipers Actitis hypoleucos breeding by an upland reservoir, in England. Biol Conserv 61:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Meffert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meffert, P.J. (2017). Birds on Urban Wastelands. In: Murgui, E., Hedblom, M. (eds) Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43314-1_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics